Volume 33, Issue 2 pp. 126-138
REVIEW

Prevalence of co-occurring psychiatric disorders in adults and adolescents with intellectual disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mario G. Mazza

Corresponding Author

Mario G. Mazza

Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy

Correspondence

Mario G. Mazza, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900 Monza (MB), Italy.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Aurora Rossetti

Aurora Rossetti

Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Giovanna Crespi

Giovanna Crespi

Psychiatric Department-ASST Monza, Monza, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Massimo Clerici

Massimo Clerici

Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 August 2019
Citations: 157

Funding information

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Abstract

Background

Subjects with intellectual disability (ID) are vulnerable to experience psychiatric disorders. The present authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of co-occurring psychiatric disorders, excluding co-occurring autism spectrum disorders, in subjects with intellectual disability.

Method

The present authors performed a random-effects meta-analysis of the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in adults and adolescents with intellectual disability.

Results

Twenty-two studies were included. The pooled prevalence of any co-occurring psychiatric disorders in intellectual disability was 33.6% (95% CI: 25.2%–43.1%) with high heterogeneity but no publication bias. Prevalence was lower in population-based studies, in studies that used ICD criteria for the psychopathology and in studies with low risk of bias. The prevalence was higher in mild, moderate and severe intellectual disability than in profound intellectual disability.

Conclusions

Psychiatric disorders are common in subjects with intellectual disability, and the present authors found that clinical and methodological moderators affect the pooled prevalence.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.