ORIGINAL RESEARCH—COUPLES' SEXUAL DYSFUNCTIONS: Unsuccessful Investigation of Preoperative Sexual Health Issues in the Prostate Cancer “Couple”: Results of a Real-Life Psychometric Survey at a Major Tertiary Academic Center
Andrea Salonia MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorGiuseppe Zanni MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAndrea Gallina MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAlberto Briganti MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAntonino Saccà MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorNazareno Suardi MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorRayan Matloob MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorLuigi F. Da Pozzo MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorRoberto Bertini MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorRenzo Colombo MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorPatrizio Rigatti MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorFrancesco Montorsi MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAndrea Salonia MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorGiuseppe Zanni MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAndrea Gallina MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAlberto Briganti MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAntonino Saccà MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorNazareno Suardi MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorRayan Matloob MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorLuigi F. Da Pozzo MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorRoberto Bertini MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorRenzo Colombo MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorPatrizio Rigatti MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorFrancesco Montorsi MD
University Vita–Salute San Raffaele—Department of Urology, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorABSTRACT
Introduction. Investigating preoperative sexual function of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and their partners is needed for realistic functional outcome analyses after radical prostatectomy (RP).
Aim. To assess pre-RP sexual health issues of PCa patients and their partners in a stable heterosexual relationship.
Methods. Data were analyzed from 3,282 consecutive patients who underwent RP over a three-period survey. During Period 1, on admission to the hospital the day prior to surgery, 1,360 patients were asked to complete the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). During Period 2, 1,171 patients were asked to complete the preoperative IIEF; similarly, patients' partners were invited to complete the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Lastly, during Period 3, only candidates for RP were asked to fill in the IIEF.
Main Outcome Measures. To assess the rate of patients who completed the questionnaire during the three-period survey. To detail the proportion of patients' partners who filled in the questionnaire, along with the partners' reasons for non-adherence to the proposed investigation during Period 2.
Results. A small rate of men completed the IIEF during Period 1 (583 in 1,360 [42.9%]), Period 2 (290 in 1,171 [24.8%]), and Period 3 (261 in 751 [34.8%]) (χ2 trend: 13.06; P = 0.0003). In this context, a significantly lower proportion of patients completed the questionnaire during Period 2, as compared with both Period 1 (χ2: 95.13; P = 0.0001) and Period 3 (χ2: 21.87; P < 0.0001). Only 82 in 1,171 (7.0%) partners completed the FSFI over Period 2. Moreover, only 6 in 82 (7.3%) of women provided complete data.
Conclusions. The investigation of sexual health issues of both partners prior to RP is largely unsuccessful. In this context, the prevalence of incomplete data collection is high, and these results demonstrate that contemporaneously investigating the sexual health issues of both partners significantly increases the prevalence of incomplete data collection. Salonia A, Zanni G, Gallina A, Briganti A, Saccà A, Suardi N, Matloob R, Da Pozzo LF, Bertini R, Colombo R, Rigatti P, and Montorsi F. Unsuccessful investigation of preoperative sexual health issues in the prostate cancer “couple”: results of a real-life psychometric survey at a major tertiary academic center. J Sex Med 2009;6:3347–3355.
References
- 1 Heidenreich A, Aus G, Bolla M, Joniau S, Matveev VB, Schmid HP, ZattoniF. European Association of Urology. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 68–80.
- 2 Stephenson RA, Mori M, Hsieh YC, Beer TM, Stanford JL, Gilliland FD, Hoffman RM, Potosky AL. Treatment of erectile dysfunction following therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: Patient reported use and outcomes from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. J Urol 2005; 174: 646–50.
- 3 Loeb S, Hernandez DJ, Mangold LA, Humphreys EB, Agro M, Walsh PC, Partin AW, Han M. Progression after radical prostatectomy for men in their thirties compared to older men. BJU Int 2008; 101: 1503–6.
- 4 Hoffman RM, Gilliland FD, Penson DF, Stone SN, Hunt WC, Potosky AL. Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of health-related quality of life between patients with prostate carcinoma and matched controls. Cancer 2004; 101: 2011–9.
- 5 Ficarra V, Novara G, Galfano A, Stringari C, Baldassarre R, Cavalleri S, Artibani W. Twelve-month self-reported quality of life after retropubic radical prostatectomy: A prospective study with Rand 36-Item Health Survey (Short Form-36). BJU Int 2006; 97: 274–8.
- 6 Hatzimouratidis K, Burnett AL, Hatzichristou D, McCullough AR, Montorsi F, Mulhall JP. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction: A critical analysis of the basic science rationale and clinical application. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 334–47.
- 7 MulhallJP. Defining and reporting erectile function outcomes after radical prostatectomy: Challenges and misconceptions. J Urol 2009; 181: 462–71.
- 8 Chartier-Kastler E, Amar E, Chevallier D, Montaigne O, Coulange C, Joubert JM, Giuliano F. Does management of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy meet patients' expectations? Results of a national survey (REPAIR) by the French Urological Association. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 693–704.
- 9 Matthew AG, Goldman A, Trachtenberg J, Robinson J, Horsburgh S, Currie K, Ritvo P. Sexual dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: Prevalence, treatments, restricted use of treatments and distress. J Urol 2005; 174: 2105–10.
- 10 Salonia A, Gallina A, Zanni G, Briganti A, Dehò F, Saccà A, Suardi N, Barbieri L, Guazzoni G, Rigatti P, Montorsi F. Acceptance of and discontinuation rate from erectile dysfunction oral treatment in patients following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 564–70.
- 11 Descazeaud A, Debré B, Flam TA. Age difference between patient and partner is a predictive factor of potency rate following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2006; 176: 2594–8.
- 12 Smith DP, Supramaniam R, King MT, Ward J, Berry M, Armstrong BK. Age, health, and education determine supportive care needs of men younger than 70 years with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 2560–6.
- 13 Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): A multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49: 822–30.
- 14 Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D'Agostino R Jr. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26: 191–208.
- 15 Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC, Smith MD, Mishra A, Osterloh IH. Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. Urology 1999; 54: 346–51.
- 16 Overgård M, Angelsen A, Lydersen S, Mørkved S. Does physiotherapist-guided pelvic floor muscle training reduce urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy? A randomised controlled trial. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 438–48.
- 17 Resendes LA, McCorkle R. Spousal responses to prostate cancer: An integrative review. Cancer Invest 2006; 24: 192–8.
- 18 Phillips C, Gray RE, Fitch MI, Labrecque M, Fergus K, Klotz L. Early postsurgery experience of prostate cancer patients and spouses. Cancer Pract 2000; 8: 165–71.
- 19 Salonia A, Zanni G, Gallina A, Saccà A, Sangalli M, Naspro R, Briganti A, Farina E, Roscigno M, DaPozzo LF, Rigatti P, Montorsi F. Baseline potency in patients candidates for bilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 360–5.
- 20 Salonia A, Gallina A, Briganti A, Zanni G, Saccà A, Dehò F, Karakiewicz P, Guazzoni G, Rigatti P, MontorsiF. Remembered international index of erectile function domain scores are not accurate in assessing preoperative potency in candidates for bilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 677–83.
- 21 Salomon G, Isbarn H, Budaeus L, Schlomm T, Briganti A, Steuber T, Heinzer H, Haese A, Graefen M, Karakiewicz PI, Huland H, Chun F. Importance of baseline potency rate assessment of men diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer prior to radical prostatectomy. J Sex Med 2009; 6: 498–504.
- 22 Wille S, Heidenreich A, Hofmann R, Engelmann U. Preoperative erectile function is one predictor for post prostatectomy incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2007; 26: 140–3.
- 23 Davison BJ, Keyes M, Elliott S, Berkowitz J, Goldenberg SL. Preferences for sexual information resources in patients treated for early-stage prostate cancer with either radical prostatectomy or brachytherapy. BJU Int 2004; 93: 965–9.
- 24 Nicolosi A, Buvat J, Glasser DB, Hartmann U, Laumann EO, GingellC, GSSAB Investigators' Group. Sexual behaviour, sexual dysfunctions and related help seeking patterns in middle-aged and elderly Europeans: The global study of sexual attitudes and behaviors. World J Urol 2006; 24: 423–8.
- 25 Shindel A, Quayle S, Yan Y, Husain A, Naughton C. Sexual dysfunction in female partners of men who have undergone radical prostatectomy correlates with sexual dysfunction of the male partner. J Sex Med 2005; 2: 833–41.
- 26 McCorkle R, Siefert ML, Dowd MF, Robinson JP, Pickett M. Effects of advanced practice nursing on patient and spouse depressive symptoms, sexual function, and marital interaction after radical prostatectomy. Urol Nurs 2007; 27: 65–77.
- 27 Oh S, Meyerowitz BE, Perez MA, Thornton AA. Need for cognition and psychosocial adjustment in prostate cancer patients and partners. J Psychosoc Oncol 2007; 25: 1–19.
- 28 Edwards B, Clarke V. The psychological impact of a cancer diagnosis on families: The influence of family functioning and patients' illness characteristics on depression and anxiety. Psycho-oncology 2004; 13: 562–76.
- 29 Raveis VH, Karus D, Pretter S. Correlates of anxiety among adult daughter caregivers to a parent with cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 1999; 17: 1–7.
- 30 Beck AM, Robinson JW, Carlson LE. Sexual intimacy in heterosexual couples after prostate cancer treatment: What we know and what we still need to learn. Urol Oncol 2009; 27: 137–43.
- 31 Soloway CT, Soloway MS, Kim SS, Kava BR. Sexual, psychological and dyadic qualities of the prostate cancer ‘couple’. BJU Int 2005; 95: 780–5.
- 32 Garos S, Kluck A, Aronoff D. Prostate cancer patients and their partners: Differences in satisfaction indices and psychological variables. J Sex Med 2007; 4: 1394–403.
- 33 Love AW, Scealy M, Bloch S, Duchesne G, Couper J, Macvean M, Costello A, Kissane DW. Psychosocial adjustment in newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2008; 42: 423–9.
- 34 Roth AJ, Weinberger MI, Nelson CJ. Prostate cancer: Psychosocial implications and management. Future Oncol 2008; 4: 561–8.
- 35 McCorkle R, Siefert ML, Dowd MF, Robinson JP, Pickett M. Effects of advanced practice nursing on patient and spouse depressive symptoms, sexual function, and marital interaction after radical prostatectomy. Urol Nurs 2007; 27: 65–77.
- 36
Kornblith AB,
Herr HW,
Ofman US,
Scher HI,
Holland JC.
Quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. The value of a data base in clinical care.
Cancer
1994; 73: 2791–802.
10.1002/1097-0142(19940601)73:11<2791::AID-CNCR2820731123>3.0.CO;2-9 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 37 Srirangam SJ, Pearson E, Grose C, Brown SC, Collins GN, O'Reilly PH. Partner's influence on patient preference for treatment in early prostate cancer. BJU Int 2003; 92: 365–9.
- 38 Feltwell AK, Rees CE. The information-seeking behaviours of partners of men with prostate cancer: A qualitative pilot study. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 54: 179–85.
- 39 Sommers BD, Beard CJ, D'Amico AV, Dahl D, Kaplan I, Richie JP, Zeckhauser RJ. Decision analysis using individual patient preferences to determine optimal treatment for localized prostate cancer. Cancer 2007; 110: 2210–7.
- 40 Gwede CK, Pow-Sang J, Seigne J, Heysek R, Helal M, Shade K, Cantor A, Jacobsen PB. Treatment decision-making strategies and influences in patients with localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2005; 104: 1381–90.
- 41 Steginga SK, Occhipinti S, Gardiner RA, Yaxley J, Heathcote P. Prospective study of men's psychological and decision-related adjustment after treatment for localized prostate cancer. Urology 2004; 63: 751–6.
- 42
Roth AJ,
Kornblith AB,
Batel-Copel L,
Peabody E,
Scher HI,
Holland JC.
Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma: A pilot study.
Cancer
1998; 82: 1904–8.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980515)82:10<1904::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-X CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 43 Cheng JY, Ng EM, Ko JS, Chen RY. Monthly income, standard of living and erectile function in late life. Int J Impot Res 2007; 19: 464–70.
- 44 Gore JL, Krupski T, Kwan L, Maliski S, Litwin MS. Partnership status influences quality of life in low-income, uninsured men with prostate cancer. Cancer 2005; 104: 191–8.
- 45 Namiki S, Kwan L, Kagawa-Singer M, Tochigi T, Ioritani N, Terai A, Arai Y, Litwin MS. Sexual function following radical prostatectomy: A prospective longitudinal study of cultural differences between Japanese and American men. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2008; 11: 298–302.
