Volume 36, Issue 1 pp. 5-16

The Monroe Doctrine: Meanings and Implications

MARK T. GILDERHUS

Corresponding Author

MARK T. GILDERHUS

Texas Christian University

Mark T. Gilderhus holds the Lyndon B. Johnson Chair in the department of history at Texas Christian University. His publications include Diplomacy and Revolution: U.S.-Mexican Relations under Wilson and Carranza; Pan American Visions: Woodrow Wilson in the Western Hemisphere, 1913-1921; History and Historians: A Historiographical Introduction; and The Second Century: U.S.-Latin American Relations since 1889.Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 February 2006
Citations: 40

Abstract

This article presents a brief history of the Monroe Doctrine since its articulation in 1823. First conceived as a statement in opposition to European intrusions in the Americas, it became under President Theodore Roosevelt a justification for U.S. intervention. To cultivate Latin American trade and goodwill during the Great Depression and the Second World War, Franklin Roosevelt's administration accepted the principle of nonintervention. Later with the onset of the Cold War, perceived international imperatives led to a series of new interventions in countries such as Guatemala, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, and Chile. Though typically couched in idealistic rhetoric emphasizing Pan-American commitments to solidarity and democracy, the various versions of the Monroe Doctrine consistently served U.S. policy makers as a means for advancing what they understood as national strategic and economic interests.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.