Performance effects and subjective disturbance of speech in acoustically different office types – a laboratory experiment
M. Haka
Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorA. Haapakangas
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Lemminkäisenkatu, Turku, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorJ. Keränen
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Lemminkäisenkatu, Turku, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorJ. Hakala
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Lemminkäisenkatu, Turku, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorE. Keskinen
Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorV. Hongisto
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Lemminkäisenkatu, Turku, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorM. Haka
Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorA. Haapakangas
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Lemminkäisenkatu, Turku, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorJ. Keränen
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Lemminkäisenkatu, Turku, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorJ. Hakala
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Lemminkäisenkatu, Turku, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorE. Keskinen
Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorV. Hongisto
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Lemminkäisenkatu, Turku, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Abstract This study examined how the intelligibility of irrelevant speech, determined with the Speech Transmission Index (STI), affects demanding cognitive task performance. Experiment was carried out in a laboratory that resembled an open-plan office. Three speech conditions were tested corresponding to a private office (STI = 0.10), an acoustically excellent open office (STI = 0.35) and an acoustically poor open office (STI = 0.65). All conditions were presented at equal level, 48 dBA. The STI was adjusted by the relative levels of speech and masking sound. Thirty-seven students participated in the experiment that lasted for 4 h. All participants performed five tasks in each of the three speech conditions. Questionnaires were used to assess subjective perceptions of the speech conditions. Performance in the operation span task, the serial recall and the activation of prior knowledge from long-term memory were deteriorated in the speech condition with the highest speech intelligibility (STI = 0.65) in comparison with the other two conditions (STI = 0.10 and STI = 0.35). Unlike performance measures, questionnaire results showed consistent differences among all three speech conditions, i.e. subjective disturbance increased with ascending speech intelligibility. Thus, subjective comfort was disturbed more easily than performance. The results support the use of STI as an essential room acoustic design measure in open-plan offices.
Practical Implications
Reduction of speech intelligibility in office environments by proper acoustic design would be beneficial in terms of both work performance and subjective comfort. Proper acoustic design requires both the use of high acoustic absorption and an appropriate masking sound.
References
- Baddeley, A.D. (2000) Working memory and language: an overview, J. Commun. Disord., 36, 189–208.
-
Baddeley, A.D. and
Hitch, G.J. (1974) Working memory. In: G. Bower (ed.) Recent Advances in Learning and Motivation, New York, Academic Press, 47–90.
10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1 Google Scholar
- Banbury, S.P. and Berry, D.C. (1998) The disruption of office-related tasks by speech and office noise, Br. J. Psychol., 89, 499–517.
- Banbury, S.P. and Berry, D.C. (2005) Office noise and employee concentration: identifying causes of disruption and potential improvements, Ergonomics, 48, 25–37.
- Banbury, S.P., Tremblay, S., Macken, W.J. and Jones, D.M. (2001) Auditory distraction and short-term memory: phenomena and practical implications, Hum. Factors, 43, 12–29.
- Beaman, C.P. and Jones, D.M. (1997) The role of serial order in the irrelevant speech effect: tests of the changing-state hypothesis, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 23, 459–471.
- Belojevic, G., Slepcevic, V. and Jakovljevic, B. (2001) Mental performance in noise: the role of introversion, J. Environ. Psychol., 21, 209–213.
- Buchner, A. and Erdfelder, E. (2005) Word frequency of irrelevant speech distractors affects serial recall, Mem. Cognit., 33, 86–97.
- Buchner, A., Irmen, L. and Erdfelder, E. (1996) On the irrelevance of semantic information for the ‘irrelevant speech’ effect, Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 49A, 765–779.
- Buchner, A., Steffens, M.C., Irmen, L. and Wender, K.F. (1998) Irrelevant auditory material affects counting, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 24, 48–67.
- Buchner, A., Rothermund, K., Wentura, D. and Mehl, B. (2004) Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall, Mem. Cognit., 32, 722–731.
- Colle, H.A. (1980) Auditory encoding in visual short-term recall: Effects of noise intensity and spatial location, J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav., 19, 722–735.
- Committee Draft ISO/CD 3382-3 (2009) Acoustics – Measurement of Room Acoustic Parameters – Part 3: Open Plan Offices, Unpublished Standard, ISO/TC 43/SC 2 N969, Geneva, Switzerland, International Organization for Standardization.
- Daneman, M. and Carpenter, P.A. (1980) Individual differences in working memory and reading, J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav., 19, 450–466.
- Daneman, M. and Merikle, P.M. (1996) Working memory and language comprehension: a meta-analysis, Psychon. Bull. Rev., 3, 422–433.
- Danielsson, C. (2005) Office Environment, Health and Job Satisfaction, Licentiate Thesis, Stockholm, Sweden, KTH Technology and Health.
- Ellermeier, W. and Hellbrück, J. (1998) Is level irrelevant in ‘irrelevant speech’? Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio and binaural masking, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit., 24, 1406–1414.
- Evans, G.W. and Johnson, D. (2000) Stress and open-office noise, J. Appl. Psychol., 85, 779–783.
- Gathercole, S. and Baddeley, A. (1993) Working Memory and Language, Hove, UK, Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Haapakangas, A., Helenius, R., Keskinen, E. and Hongisto, V. (2008) Perceived acoustic environment, work performance and well-being – survey results from Finnish offices. In: B. Griefahn (ed.) Proceedings of ICBEN 2008, Connecticut, USA, Mashantucket, The 9th Congress of the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Noise, 434–441.
- Hannon, B. and Daneman, M. (2001) A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension, J. Educ. Psychol., 93, 103–128.
- Hongisto, V. (2005) A model predicting the effect of speech of varying intelligibility on work performance, Indoor Air, 15, 458–468.
- Hongisto, V. (2008) Effects of sound masking on workers – a case study in a landscape office. In: B. Griefahn (ed.) Proceedings of ICBEN 2008, Connecticut, USA, Mashantucket, The 9th Congress of the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Noise, 442–449.
- Hongisto, V., Keränen, J. and Larm, P. (2004) Simple model for the acoustical design of open-plan offices, Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 90, 481–495.
- Hughes, R.W., Vachon, F. and Jones, D.M. (2007) Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit., 33, 1050–1061.
- IEC 60268-16 (1998) “Sound system equipment - Part 16: Objective Rating of Speech Intelligibility by Speech Transmission Index,” Geneva, Switzerland, International Electrotechnical Commission.
- Jones, D.M. and Broadbent, D.E. (1991) Human performance and noise. In: C. Harris (ed.) Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control, 3rd edn, chapter 24, NY, McGraw Hill, 24.1–24.24.
- Jones, D.M., Miles, C. and Page, J. (1990) Disruption of proof-reading by irrelevant speech: effects of attention arousal or memory? Appl. Cognit. Psychol., 4, 89–108.
-
Jones, D.M.,
Madden, C.A. and
Miles, C. (1992) Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: the role of changing state, Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 44A, 645–669.
10.1080/14640749208401304 Google Scholar
- Jones, D., Farrand, P., Stuart, G. and Morris, N. (1995) Functional equivalence of verbal and spatial information in serial short-term memory, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit., 21, 1008–1018.
- Jones, D., Alford, D., Tremblay, S., Macken, B. and Bridges, A. (1999) Organizational factors in selective attention: the interplay of acoustic distinctiveness and auditory streaming, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit., 25, 464–473.
- Jones, D.M., Alford, D., Macken, W.J., Banbury, S. and Tremblay, S. (2000) Interference from auditory degraded stimuli: linear effects of stimulus mismatch in the irrelevant sequence, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 108, 1082–1088.
- Jones, D., Hughes, R., Marsh, J. and Macken, W. (2008) Varieties of auditory distraction. In: B. Griefahn (ed.) Proceedings of ICBEN 2008, Connecticut, USA, Mashantucket, The 9th Congress of the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Noise, 362–368.
- Kaarlela-Tuomaala, A., Helenius, R., Keskinen, E. and Hongisto, V. (2009) Effects of acoustic environment on work in private office rooms and open-plan offices –longitudinal study during relocation, Ergonomics, in press.
- Keränen, J., Virjonen, P. and Hongisto, V. (2007) A New Model for Acoustical Design of Open-Plan Offices, International Congress on Acoustics, 2–7 September 2007, A. Calvo-Manzano, A. Pérez-López and J. Salvador (eds), Madrid, Spain, Spanish Acoustial Society, paper RBA-10-006-IP.
- Laine, M. and Virtanen, P. (1999) Word Mill Lexical Search Program, Turku, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Turku.
- Landström, U., Söderberg, L., Kjellberg, A. and Nordström, B. (2002) Annoyance and performance effects of nearby speech, Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 88, 549–553.
- Larm, P. and Hongisto, V. (2006) Experimental comparison between speech transmission index, rapid speech transmission index, and speech intelligibility index, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 119, 1106–1117.
- LeCompte, D.C., Neely, C.B. and Wilson, J.R. (1997) Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones: the relative importance of speech to the irrelevant speech effect, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit., 23, 472–483.
- Loewen, L.J. and Suedfeld, P. (1992) Cognitive arousal effects of masking office noise, Environ. Behav., 24, 381–395.
- Macken, W.J., Tremblay, S., Alford, D. and Jones, D.M. (1999) Attentional selectivity in short-term memory: similarity of process, not similarity of content, determines disruption, Int. J. Psychol., 34, 322–327.
- Marsh, J.E., Hughes, R.W. and Jones, D.M. (2008) Auditory distraction in semantic memory: a process-based approach, J. Mem. Lang., 58, 682–700.
- Martin, R.C., Wolgalter, M.S. and Forlano, J.G. (1988) Reading comprehension in the presence of unattended speech and music, J. Mem. Lang., 27, 382–398.
- Miles, C., Madden, C. and Jones, D.M. (1988) Levels of interference by irrelevant speech: one, some or many? In: A.M. Colley and J.R. Beech (eds) Cognition and Action in Skilled Behaviour, Oxford, England, North-Holland, 349–359.
- Navai, M. and Veitch, J. (2003) Acoustic Satisfaction in Open-Plan Offices: Review and Recommendations, Ottawa, Canada, Institute for Research in Construction, Research Report IRC-RR-151, 2003.
- Oswald, C.J.P., Tremblay, S. and Jones, D.M. (2000) Disruption of comprehension by meaning of irrelevant sound, Memory, 8, 345–350.
- Parmentier, F.B., Elford, G. and Mayberry, M. (2005) Transitional information in spatial serial memory: path characteristics affect recall performance, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit., 31, 412–427.
- Pejtersen, J., Allermann, L., Kristensen, T.S. and Poulsen, O.M. (2006) Indoor climate, psychosocial work environment and symptoms in open-plan offices, Indoor Air, 16, 392–401.
- Sailer, U. and Hassenzahl, M. (2000) Assessing noise nuisance: an improvement-oriented approach, Ergonomics, 43, 1920–1938.
-
Salamé, P. and
Baddeley, A.D. (1989) Effects of background music on phonological short-term memory, Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 41A, 107–122.
10.1080/14640748908402355 Google Scholar
-
Schlittmeier, S.J. and
Hellbrück, J. (2008) Background music as noise abatement in open-plan offices: a laboratory study on performance effects and subjective preferences, Appl. Cognit. Psychol.
DOI
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1498. Available at: http://www.interscience.wiley.com.
10.1002/acp.1498 Google Scholar
- Schlittmeier, S.J., Hellbrück, J., Thaden, R. and Vorländer, M. (2008) The impact of background speech varying in intelligibility: effects on cognitive performance and perceived disturbance, Ergonomics, 51, 719–736.
- Sundstrom, E., Town, J.P., Rice, R.W., Osborn, D.P. and Brill, M. (1994) Office noise, satisfaction, and performance, Environ. Behav., 26, 195–222.
- Tremblay, S. and Jones, D.M. (1999) Change of intensity fails to produce irrelevant sound effect: implications for the representation of unattended sound, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 25, 1005–1015.
- Turner, M.L. and Engle, R.W. (1989) Is working memory capacity task dependent? J. Mem. Lang., 28, 127– 154.
- Veitch, J.A., Bradley, J.S., Legault, L.M., Norcross, S. and Svec, J.M. (2002). Masking Speech in Open-Plan Offices with Simulated Ventilation Noise: Noise Level and Spectral Composition Effects on Acoustic Satisfaction, Ottawa, Canada, Institute for Research in Construction, Internal Report IRC-846, 2002.
- Venetjoki, N., Kaarlela-Tuomaala, A., Keskinen, E. and Hongisto, V. (2006) The effect of speech and speech intelligibility on task performance, Ergonomics, 49, 1068–1091.
- Virjonen, P., Keränen, J., Helenius, R., Hakala, J. and Hongisto, V. (2007) Speech privacy between neighbouring workstations in an open office – a laboratory study, Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 93, 771–782.
- Virjonen, P., Keränen, J. and Hongisto, V. (2009) Determination of acoustical conditions in open-plan offices – proposal for new measurement method and target values, Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 95, 279–290.