Volume 18, Issue 11 pp. 954-961

Hydrophilic and lipophilic moisturizers have similar penetration profiles but different effects on SC water distribution in vivo

Julia Caussin

Julia Caussin

Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Division of Drug Delivery Technology, Gorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands;

Search for more papers by this author
Evelien Rozema

Evelien Rozema

Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Division of Drug Delivery Technology, Gorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands;

Search for more papers by this author
Gert S. Gooris

Gert S. Gooris

Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Division of Drug Delivery Technology, Gorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands;

Search for more papers by this author
Johann W. Wiechers

Johann W. Wiechers

Uniqema, Gouda, The Netherlands;

Search for more papers by this author
Stan Pavel

Stan Pavel

Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Dermatology, Leiden, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Joke A. Bouwstra

Joke A. Bouwstra

Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Division of Drug Delivery Technology, Gorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands;

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 October 2009
Citations: 30
Joke A. Bouwstra, Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Gorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden University, PO Box 9502, 2300RA Leiden, The Netherlands, Tel.: 00 31 71 5274208, Fax: 00 31 71 5274565, e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Abstract: Dry skin is often treated with hydrophilic and/or lipophilic moisturizers. Hydrophilic moisturizers must penetrate the stratum corneum (SC) deeply to function properly, whereas lipophilic moisturizers should remain in the upper SC layers. In this study, both types of moisturizers were applied on volunteers for 3 h, after which the relative amount of moisturizer and the water distribution in the SC were determined using attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy in combination with tape-stripping. The results show that while hydrophilic moisturizers penetrate much more readily than lipophilic moisturizers, the latter are abundantly present in the upper regions of the SC. It was also observed that a 3-h treatment with lipophilic moisturizer did not result in increased water levels in the SC, whereas hydrophilic moisturizers retained water where they are located. The results suggest that upon prolonged application, adequate amounts of moisturizer can be obtained in those regions where they may cause moisturization in the central part of the SC. However, a single application of 3 h is probably too short to exert increased hydration as measured with ATR-FTIR.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.