Volume 17, Issue 6 pp. 633-637

Titanium surface modification and its effect on the adherence of Porphyromonas gingivalis: an in vitro study

Amoroso Pier-Francesco

Amoroso Pier-Francesco

Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine & Pathology, Dental School, Cardiff University Cardiff, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Robert J. Adams

Robert J. Adams

Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine & Pathology, Dental School, Cardiff University Cardiff, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Mark G. J. Waters

Mark G. J. Waters

Department of Matrix Biology and Tissue Repair, Dental School, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

Search for more papers by this author
David W. Williams

David W. Williams

Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine & Pathology, Dental School, Cardiff University Cardiff, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 September 2006
Citations: 139
Correspondence to:
David W. Williams
Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine & Pathology
Dental School
Cardiff University
Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XY
UK
Tel.:/Fax: +44 (0)29 20742442
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Aim: Titanium dental implants are an important treatment option in the replacement of missing teeth. Implant failures can, however, occur and may be promoted by the loss of tissue as a result of local bacterial infection (peri-implantitis).

Objectives: Bacterial adherence to implant surfaces is believed to be influenced by material surface roughness and surface-free energy parameters. Consequently, the aim of this study was to modify these properties of titanium and identify what effect these modifications had on subsequent bacterial adherence.

Materials and methods: In this study, 16 titanium samples of different roughness (Ra 34.57–449.42 nm) were prepared using specific polishing procedures. A further six samples were chemically altered by argon plasma discharge treatment and immersion in silane solutions to produce different surface hydrophobicities. An in vitro adhesion assay using Porphyromonas gingivalis was used to assess the effect of modification on bacterial adherence.

Results: A significant reduction in adhesion to materials categorised as being ‘very smooth’ (Ra 34.57±5.79 nm) was evident. This reduction did not occur with ‘smooth’ (Ra 155.00±33.36 nm), ‘rough’ (Ra 223.24±9.86 nm) or ‘very rough’ (Ra 449.42±32.97 nm) surfaces. Changing material surface hydrophobicity was also not found to effect bacterial adhesion.

Conclusions: Adhesion of P. gingivalis to titanium was inhibited at surface roughness levels below those generally encountered for implant collars/abutments (Ra 350 nm). Considerations of these findings may be beneficial in the production of titanium implants in order to reduce bacterial colonisation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.