Volume 28, Issue 6 pp. 633-640

Noninvasive Assessment of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure with Tissue Doppler Imaging in Patients with Mitral Regurgitation

Osman Yesildag M.D., F.E.S.C.

Osman Yesildag M.D., F.E.S.C.

Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Istanbul, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Diyar Koprulu M.D.

Diyar Koprulu M.D.

Bafra State Hospital Department of Cardiology, Samsun, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Serkan Yuksel M.D.

Serkan Yuksel M.D.

Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Samsun, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Korhan Soylu M.D.

Korhan Soylu M.D.

Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Samsun, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Beste Ozben M.D.

Beste Ozben M.D.

Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Istanbul, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 July 2011
Citations: 10
Beste Ozben, Yildiz Caddesi Konak Apartmani, No: 43/24 Besiktas, Istanbul 34353, Turkey. Fax: 90-212-2589943; E-mail: [email protected]

Funding Status: No grant is received for the study.

Disclosure: There is no conflict of interest.

This work was presented in the 2008 ESC Congress (30 August-3 September 2008, Munich, Germany) as poster presentation.

Abstract

Background: The ratio of early transmitral flow velocity to mitral annulus early diastolic velocity (E/Ea) is a widely used noninvasive tool to estimate left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP). The aim of this study was to explore whether E/Ea ratio was a reliable index for the estimation of LVEDP in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR). Methods: Sixteen patients with nonischemic MR (primary MR group; 6 male, 58 ± 12 years) 51 patients with ischemic MR (secondary MR group; 29 male, 63 ± 9 years) and 29 patients without MR (control group; 19 male, 53 ± 10 years) were consecutively included. The peak transmitral flow and mitral annular velocities during early diastole were measured. LVEDP was determined invasively by left heart catheterization. Results: Primary and secondary MR groups had significantly higher E/Ea ratios and LVEDP than control group. LVEDP significantly correlated with E/Ea ratio in patients with primary MR, but not in patients with secondary MR. Multiple regression analysis revealed that E/Ea ratio was an independent predictor of LVEDP in patients with primary MR. Ten patients with primary MR had LVEDP ≥15 mmHg. ROC analysis demonstrated cutoff values for E/Ea ratios as >10.5 for lateral mitral annulus (sensitivity: 80%, specificity: 66%, PPV: 80%, NPV: 66%) and as >14 for medial mitral annulus (sensitivity: 90%, specificity: 83%, PPV: 90%, NPV: 83%) to predict primary MR patients with LVEDP ≥15 mmHg. Conclusion: E/Ea ratio is still reliable in estimation of LVEDP in primary MR patients while it is not predictive for LVEDP in secondary MR patients. (Echocardiography 2011;28:633-640)

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.