Volume 36, Issue 1 pp. 110-114

Experimental Research With Synthetic Copolymer-Coated Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits: Inflammatory and Thrombogenicity Analysis

Edmo Atique Gabriel

Corresponding Author

Edmo Atique Gabriel

Albert Einstein Jewish Hospital, Experimental Surgery Center, São Paulo, Brazil

Dr. Edmo Atique Gabriel, Rua Melo Alves, 685, apt # 171, Cerqueira Cesar—01417010, São Paulo, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Fredy Max Ayala Montevilla

Fredy Max Ayala Montevilla

Albert Einstein Jewish Hospital, Experimental Surgery Center, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Valeria Vieira Chida

Valeria Vieira Chida

Albert Einstein Jewish Hospital, Experimental Surgery Center, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Fabio Nunes Dias

Fabio Nunes Dias

Nipro Medical Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Cynara Viterbo Montoya

Cynara Viterbo Montoya

Nipro Medical Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Hiroaki Otsubo

Hiroaki Otsubo

Nipro Medical Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Zenício Francisco Pires

Zenício Francisco Pires

Nipro Medical Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Sergio Luiz Nogaroto

Sergio Luiz Nogaroto

Nipro Medical Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 August 2011
Citations: 1

Abstract

This study aimed to assess complement system activation and index of thrombogenicity and platelet aggregation between synthetic copolymer-coated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit and conventional CPB circuit. Twenty-six pigs were equally divided into two groups—the conventional group and the coated group. They were placed on CPB for 90 min, and blood samples were collected at three different time points (T0, right before CPB establishment; T1, 45 min after starting CPB; and T2, 90 min after starting CPB) to measure total count of inflammatory cells (leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelets) and serum levels of fraction C3 of complement system. Upon completion of the 90-min CPB, fragments of different compartments of the CPB circuit were taken for assessing index of thrombogenicity and platelet aggregation. There were no differences between both groups regarding total count of leukocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes; however, there was a lower count of platelets at T2 in the coated group (P = 0.020). The serum level of fraction C3 was lower in the coated group at T1 (P = 0.020) and T2 (P = 0.017). Higher index of thrombogenicity and platelet aggregation were detected in the conventional group (77% of the animals within the conventional group) than in the coated group (46% of the animals within the coated group). In conclusion, in heart surgery requiring CPB, the use of synthetic copolymer-coated CPB circuit may be useful to reduce complement system activation, as well as attenuating index of thrombogenicity and platelet aggregation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.