Volume 16, Issue 1 pp. 28-31

Clinical Implications of Subcategorizing BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions associated with Microcalcification: A Radiology–Pathology Correlation Study

Mary Ann Sanders MD, PhD

Mary Ann Sanders MD, PhD

Departments of Pathology

Search for more papers by this author
Lane Roland MD

Lane Roland MD

Radiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky

Search for more papers by this author
Sunati Sahoo MD

Sunati Sahoo MD

Departments of Pathology

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 January 2010
Citations: 29
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Sunati Sahoo, MD, Department of Pathology, University of Louisville Hospital, 530 S. Jackson Street, Louisville, Kentucky-40202, or e-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

Abstract: Currently radiologists have the option of subcategorizing BI-RADS 4 breast lesions into 4A (low suspicion for malignancy), 4B (intermediate suspicion of malignancy), and 4C (moderate concern, but not classic for malignancy). To determine the clinical significance of BI-RADS 4 subcategories and the common pathologic changes associated with these mammographic lesions, a retrospective review of 239 consecutive stereotactic-needle core biopsies (SNCB) for microcalcifications was performed. All 239 SNCBs were BI-RADS 4 lesions, and of these, 191 were subcategorized to 4A, 4B or 4C. Ninety-four of 191 (49%) were 4A, 73 (38%) were 4B, and 24 (13%) were 4C. Fibrocystic change was the most common finding (66/239; 28%) followed by ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounting for 23% of cases. This was followed by columnar cell alteration with or without atypia (47/239; 19%), and fibroadenoma (45/239; 19%). While 70% (17/24) of BI-RADS 4C category lesions were DCIS, only 21% (15/73) of BI-RADS 4B and 10% (10/94) of BI-RADS 4A were DCIS. Without sub-categorization, carcinoma was diagnosed in 23% (55/239) of all cases with BI-RADS 4. Therefore, subcategorizing BI-RADS 4 lesions is important since it not only benefits the patient and clinician in understanding the level of concern for carcinoma, but will also alert the pathologist.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.