Volume 46, Issue 2 pp. 491-509

Using Standardized Encounters to Understand Reported Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Patient Experiences with Care

Robin M. Weinick

Robin M. Weinick

The RAND Corporation, 1200 S. Hayes Street, Arlington VA 22202

Address correspondence to Robin M. Weinick, Ph.D., The RAND Corporation, 1200 S. Hayes Street, Arlington VA 22202; e-mail: [email protected]. Marc N. Elliott, Ph.D., and Q Burkhart, M.S., are with the The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. Angelo E. Volandes, M.D., M.P.H., is with the Section of General Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. Lenny Lopez, M.D., M.P.H., is with the Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Boston, MA. Mark Schlesinger, Ph.D., is with the School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

Search for more papers by this author
Marc N. Elliott

Marc N. Elliott

The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA

Search for more papers by this author
Angelo E. Volandes

Angelo E. Volandes

Section of General Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

Search for more papers by this author
Lenny Lopez

Lenny Lopez

Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Boston, MA

Search for more papers by this author
Q Burkhart

Q Burkhart

The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA

Search for more papers by this author
Mark Schlesinger

Mark Schlesinger

School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 December 2010
Citations: 39

Abstract

Objective. To assess the extent to which racial/ethnic differences in ratings of patient experiences with health care represent true differences versus differences in expectations, how scales are used, or how identical physician–patient interactions are perceived by members of different groups.

Study Setting. Primary data collection from a nationally representative online panel (n=567), including white, African American, and Latino respondents.

Study Design. We administered questions on expectations of care, a series of written vignettes, a video-depicted doctor–patient interaction, and modified CAHPS Clinician and Group Doctor Communication items.

Principal Findings. Different groups reported generally similar expectations regarding physicians' behaviors and provided similar mean responses to CAHPS communication items in response to standardized encounters.

Conclusions. Preliminary evidence suggests that unlike more subjective global ratings, reported disparities in more specific and objective CAHPS composites may primarily reflect differences in experiences, rather than differences in expectations and scale use, adding to our confidence in using the latter to assess disparities.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.