REGIONAL POPULATION–EMPLOYMENT DYNAMICS ACROSS DIFFERENT SECTORS OF THE ECONOMY*
Thomas de Graaff
Department of Spatial Economics, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, and Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorFrank G. van Oort
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, and Department of Economic Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorRaymond J.G.M. Florax
Department of Spatial Economics, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN; and Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorThomas de Graaff
Department of Spatial Economics, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, and Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorFrank G. van Oort
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, and Department of Economic Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorRaymond J.G.M. Florax
Department of Spatial Economics, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN; and Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorA previous version of this paper was presented at the conference “Urban Development: Patterns, Causes, Foundations and Policy” organized by the Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS), the Erasmus University Rotterdam, and Utrecht University (Department of Economics and Faculty of Geosciences), in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 13–14 December 2010. The authors would like to thank the conference participants, the journal reviewers, and the editors for useful comments and discussion.
Abstract
ABSTRACT An important subset of the literature on agglomeration externalities hypothesizes that intrasectoral and intersectoral relations are endogenously determined in models of local and regional economic growth. Remarkably, structural adjustment models describing the spatio-temporal dynamics of population and employment levels or growth traditionally do not include intersectoral economic dynamics. This paper argues and shows that allowing for economic linkages across sectors in these models adds considerable value, especially in forecasting. An econometric model of population–employment dynamics, in which sectoral variations in economic development are explicitly taken into account, is applied to a large urban planning policy proposal in the Netherlands. The empirical analyses suggest that population dynamics are largely exogenous, population changes drive employment in particular in the industry and retail sectors, and employment in all sectors depends strongly on intersectoral dynamics. Intersectoral dynamics appear as important drivers of regional sectoral employment changes; they are even more important than population changes, and their effect shows up clearly even within the Dutch institutional context where strict regulatory housing and planning restrictions are enforced.
REFERENCES
- Abdelrahman, Hesham M.. 1988. “Product Differentiation, Monopolistic Competition and City Size,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 18, 69–86.
- Almeida, Paul and Bruce Kogut. 1999. “Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks,” Management Science, 45, 905–917.
-
Alonso, William. 1964. Location and Land Use.
Cambridge
,
MA
: Harvard University Press.
10.4159/harvard.9780674730854 Google Scholar
- Amsterdambrief. 2011. “ Economic Development Perspectives for the Northwing of the Randstad,” The Hague, Ministry of Economic Affairs (in Dutch).
-
Baldwin, Richard E.,
Rikard Forslid,
Philippe Martin,
Gianmarco I. P. Ottaviano, and
Frederic Robert-Nicoud. 2003. Economic Geography and Public Policy.
Princeton
,
NJ
: Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400841233 Google Scholar
- Barca, Fabrizio, Philip McCann, and Andres Roderiguez-Pose. 2012. “The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-based versus Place-neutral Approaches,” Journal of Regional Science, 52 (1), 134–152.
- Beaudry, Catherine and Andrea Schiffauerova. 2009. “Who’s Right, Marshall or Jacobs? The Localization versus Urbanization Debate,” Research Policy, 38, 318–337.
- Berg, Jaap J., Simon Franke, and Arnold Reijndorp. 2007. Adolescent Almere. How a City is Made. Rotterdam: NAi-Publishers.
- Boarnet, Marlon C. 1994a. “The Monocentric Model and Employment Location,” Journal of Urban Economics, 36, 79–97.
-
Boarnet, Marlon C. 1994b. “An Empirical Model of Intrametropolitan Population and Employment Growth,”
Papers in Regional Science, 73, 135–152.
10.1111/j.1435-5597.1994.tb00607.x Google Scholar
- Boarnet, Marlon C., Saksith Chalermpong, and Elizabeth Geho. 2005. “Specification Issues in Models of Population and Employment Growth,” Papers in Regional Science, 84, 21–46.
- Bollinger, Christopher R. and Keith R. Ihlanfeldt. 2003. “The Intraurban Spatial Distribution of Employment: Which Government Interventions Make a Difference?,” Journal of Urban Economics, 53, 396–412.
- Bolton, Roger. 1992. “Place Prosperity Vs People Prosperity Revisited - An Old Issue with A New Angle,” Urban Studies, 29, 185–203.
- Briant, Anthony, Pierre-Philippe Combes, and Miren Lafourcade. 2010. “Dots to Boxes: Do the Size and Shape of Spatial Units Jeopardize Economic Geography Estimations?,” Journal of Urban Economics, 67, 287–302.
- Brueckner, Jan K. 1978. “Urban General Equilibrium Models with Non-central production,” Journal of Regional Science, 18, 203–215.
- Carlino, Gerald A. and Edwin S. Mills. 1987. “The Determinants of Country Growth,” Journal of Regional Science, 27, 39–54.
- Carruthers, John I. and Gordon F. Mulligan. 2007. “Land Absorption in US Metropolitan Areas: Estimates and Projections from Regional Adjustment Models,” Geographical Analysis, 39, 78–104.
- Carruthers, John I. and Gordon F. Mulligan. 2008. “A Locational Analysis of Growth and Change in American Metropolitan Areas,” Papers in Regional Science, 87, 155–171.
- Carruthers, John I. and Alexander C. Vias. 2005. “Urban, Suburban, and Exurban Sprawl in the Rocky Mountain West: Evidence from Regional Adjustment Models,” Journal of Regional Science, 45, 21–48.
- CPB. 2009. Cost-benefit Analysis of Urbanisation and Public Transport Alternatives for Almere. Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB; in Dutch), The Hague.
- Groot, Henri de, Gerard Marlet, Coen N. Teulings, and Wouter Vermeulen. 2010. City and countryside. The Hague, Netherland Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (in Dutch).
- de Groot, Henri L. F., Jacques Poot, and Martijn J. Smit. 2009. “ Agglomeration Externalities, Innovation and Regional Growth: Theoretical Perspectives and Meta-analysis,” in P. Nijkamp and R. Capello (eds.), Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories, Chapter 14, pp. 256–281. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
- de Vor, Friso and Henri L. F. de Groot. 2010. “Agglomeration Externalities and Localized Employment Growth: The Performance of Industrial Sites in Amsterdam,” Annals of Regional Science, 44, 409–431.
- Duranton, Gilles and Henri G. Overman. 2005. “Testing for Localization using Micro-geographic Data,” Review of Economic Studies, 72, 1077–1106.
- Duranton, Gilles and Diego Puga. 2000. “Diversity and Specialisation in Cities: Why, Where and When does it Matter?,” Urban Studies, 37, 533–555.
- Duranton, Gilles and Diego Puga. 2004. “ Micro-Foundations of Urban Agglomeration Economies,” in J. V. Henderson and J. F. Thisse (eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Chapter 48, pp. 2063–2117. Amsterdam : Elsevier.
- Frenken, Koen, Frank G. van Oort, and Thijs Verburg. 2007. “Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth,” Regional Studies, 41, 685–697.
-
Fujita, Masahisa. 1989. Urban Economic Theory: Land Use and City Size.
Cambridge
,
MA
: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511625862 Google Scholar
- Fujita, Masahisa, Paul Krugman, and Anthony J. Venables. 1999. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and Economic Trade. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
- Glaeser, Edward L., Hedi D. Kallal, Jose A. Scheinkman, and Andrei Schleifer. 1992. “Growth in Cities,” Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1126–1152.
- Graves, Philip E. 1983. “Migration with a Composite Amenity; the Role of Rents,” Journal of Regional Science, 23, 541–546.
- Haughwout, Andrew F. 2010. “Management of Large City Regions: Designing Efficient Metropolitan Fiscal Policies,” Journal of Regional Science, 50, 401–421.
- Henderson, Vernon. 1997. “Externalities and Industrial Development,” Journal of Urban Economics, 42, 449–470.
- Henderson, Vernon, Ari Kuncoro, and Matthew Turner. 1995. “Industrial-Development in Cities,” Journal of Political Economy, 103, 1067–1090.
- Hoogstra, Gerke J., Raymond J. G. M. Florax, and Jouke van Dijk. 2005. Do ‘Jobs Follow People’ or ‘People Follow Jobs’? A Meta-analysis of Carlino-Mills Studies. Working paper, Universiteit Groningen.
- Hoogstra, Gerke J., Jouke van Dijk, and Raymond J. G. M. Florax. 2011. “Determinants of Variation in Population-Employment Interaction Findings: A Quasi-Experimental Meta-Analysis,” Geographical Analysis, 43, 14–37.
- Irwin, Elena G. 2010. “New Directions for Urban Economic Models of Land Use Change: Incorporating Spatial Dynamics and Heterogeneity,” Journal of Regional Science, 50, 65–91.
- Kelejian, Harry H. and Ingmar R. Prucha. 1998. “A Generalized Spatial Two-Stage Least Squares Procedure for Estimating a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17, 99–121.
- Kelejian, Harry H. and Ingmar R. Prucha. 2004. “Estimation of Simultaneous Systems of Spatially Interrelated Cross Sectional Equations,” Journal of Econometrics, 118, 27–50.
- Klepper, Steven. 2007. “Disagreements, Spinoffs, and the Evolution of Detroit as the Capital of the US Automobile Industry,” Management Science, 53, 616–631.
- LeSage, James P. and R. Kelly Pace. 2009. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
- Lissoni, Francesco. 2001. “Knowledge Codification and the Geography of Innovation: the Case of Brescia Mechanical Cluster,” Research Policy, 30, 1479–1500.
- McCann, Philip and Frank van Oort. 2009. “ Theories of Agglomeration and Regional Economic Growth: A Historical Review,” in Peter Nijkamp and Roberta Capello (eds.), Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories, Chapter 1, pp. 19–32. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
- Melo, Patricia C., Daniel J. Graham, and Robert B. Noland. 2010. “A Meta-analysis of Estimates of Urban Agglomeration Economies,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39, 332–342.
- Muth, Richard F. 1969. Cities and Housing. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press.
- Ponds, Roderik, Frank van Oort, and Koen Frenken. 2010. “Innovation, Spillovers and University-industry Collaboration: An Extended Knowledge Production Function Approach,” Journal of Economic Geography, 10, 231–255.
- Puga, Diego. 2010. “The Magnitude and Causes of Agglomeration Economies,” Journal of Regional Science, 50, 203–219.
- Roback, Jennifer. 1982. “Wages, Rents and the Quality of Life,” Journal of Political Economy, 90, 1257–1278.
- Rosenthal, Stuart S. and William C. Strange. 2001. “The Determinants of Agglomeration,” Journal of Urban Economics, 59, 191–229.
- Rosenthal, Stuart S. and William C. Strange. 2004. “ Evidence on the Nature and Sources of Agglomeration Economies,” in J. Vernon Henderson and Jacques-Francois Thisse (eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Chapter 49, pp. 2119–2171. Amsterdam : Elsevier.
- Sohn, Jungyul and Geoffrey J. D. Hewings. 2000. “ Spatial Evidence of Agglomeration Economies in Chicago.” Working paper.
- Steinnes, Donald N. 1977. “Do People Follow Jobs” or “Do Jobs Follow People”? A Causality Issue in Urban Economics,” Journal of Urban Economics, 4, 69–79.
- Storper, Michael and Anthony J. Venables. 2004. “Buzz: Face-to-face Contact and the Urban Economy,” Journal of Economic Geography, 4, 351–370.
- Structuurvisie. 2008. “ Structuurvisie Randstad 2040.” The Hague, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment.
- Thisse, Jacques-Francois. F. 2010. “Toward a Unified Theory of Economic Geography and Urban Economics,” Journal of Regional Science, 50, 281–296.
- Thissen, Mark. 2005. “ Raem: Regional Applied General Equilibrium Model or the Netherlands,” in Frank van Oort, Mark Thissen, and Leo van Wissen (eds.), A Survey of Spatial Planning Models in the Netherlands: Theory, Application and Evaluation, Chapter 4, pp. 65–86. Rotterdam : NAi Publishers.
- Thissen, Mark, Frank van Oort, and Leo van Wissen. 2005. A Survey of Spatial Planning Models in the Netherlands: Theory, Application and Evaluationy of Spatial economic planning models in the Netherlands. Theory, application and evualation. Rotterdam : NAi Publishers.
- van Oort, Frank G. 2007. “Spatial and Sectoral Decomposition Effects of Agglomeration Economies in the Netherlands,” Papers in Regional Science, 86, 5–30.
- van Oort, Frank G., Martijn Burger, and Otto Raspe. 2010. “On the Economic Foundation of the Urban Network Paradigm: Spatial Integration, Functional Integration and Economic Complementarities within the Dutch Randstad,” Urban Studies, 47, 725–748.
- Venables, Anthony J. 1996. “Equilibrium Locations of Vertically Linked Industries,” International Economic Review, 37, 341–359.
- Vermeulen, Wouter and Jan Rouwendal. 2007. “ Housing Supply and Land Use Regulation in the Netherlands.” Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, TI 2007-058/3, Amsterdam.
- Vermeulen, Wouter and Jos van Ommeren. 2009. “Does Land Use Planning Shape Regional Economies? A Simultaneous Analysis of Housing Supply, Internal Migration and Local Employment Growth in the Netherlands,” Journal of Housing Economics, 18, 294–310.
- Wheaton, William C. 2004. “Commuting, Congestion and Employment Dispersal in Cities with Mixed Land Use,” Journal of Urban Economics, 55, 417–439.