Volume 20, Issue 8 pp. 727-733

Efficacy of palatal block for analgesia following palatoplasty in children with cleft palate

NIRMALA JONNAVITHULA MD

NIRMALA JONNAVITHULA MD

Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical care and Plastic and Reconstructive surgery, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India-500082

Section Editor: Prof Adrian Bosenberg

Search for more papers by this author
PADMAJA DURGA MD, DNB

PADMAJA DURGA MD, DNB

Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical care and Plastic and Reconstructive surgery, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India-500082

Section Editor: Prof Adrian Bosenberg

Search for more papers by this author
VAMSIKRISHNA MADDURI MD

VAMSIKRISHNA MADDURI MD

Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical care and Plastic and Reconstructive surgery, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India-500082

Section Editor: Prof Adrian Bosenberg

Search for more papers by this author
GOPINATH RAMACHANDRAN MD, FFARCS I

GOPINATH RAMACHANDRAN MD, FFARCS I

Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical care and Plastic and Reconstructive surgery, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India-500082

Section Editor: Prof Adrian Bosenberg

Search for more papers by this author
RAMBABU NUVVULA MS, M.Ch

RAMBABU NUVVULA MS, M.Ch

Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical care and Plastic and Reconstructive surgery, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India-500082

Section Editor: Prof Adrian Bosenberg

Search for more papers by this author
R. SRIKANTH MS, M.Ch

R. SRIKANTH MS, M.Ch

Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical care and Plastic and Reconstructive surgery, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India-500082

Section Editor: Prof Adrian Bosenberg

Search for more papers by this author
MUKUNDA R. DAMALCHERUVU MS, M.Ch

MUKUNDA R. DAMALCHERUVU MS, M.Ch

Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical care and Plastic and Reconstructive surgery, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India-500082

Section Editor: Prof Adrian Bosenberg

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 July 2010
Citations: 39
Nirmala Jonnavithula, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and critical Care, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, India-500082 (email: [email protected]; [email protected])

Summary

Background: This prospective randomized controlled study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of palatal block i.e. blocking of naso palatine, greater and also lesser palatine nerves in children with cleft palate undergoing palatoplasty by evaluating its effects on intraoperative anesthetic requirement, postoperative analgesia and parental satisfaction.

Methods: Forty-five pediatric patients aged below five undergoing cleft palate repair were randomly allocated to three groups of 15 each. After tracheal intubation, Group NB received no block for control, group S received 0.5 ml of normal saline and group B received 0.5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine for palatal block. Postoperative pain score, the time to first demand of analgesia and number of rescue analgesic demands were noted. Finally, the parental satisfaction was graded.

Results: The block had no anesthetic sparing effect. The mean pain scores were significantly lower in patients who received block than in the group NB. The mean area under curve for FLACC score in group NB was 29 with 95% CI of 25–32, group S was 15 with 95% CI of 8.9–22.3 and in group B, it was 10 with 95% CI of 6–14. The time to first demand of analgesia was 6 [4.5–6] h in group NB, 18 [6–18] h in group S and 18 [18–18] h in group B (P-0.000). The number of demands of rescue analgesia was significantly less in group B 0 [0–0.25], 0 [0–2] in S group compared to group NB 3 [3–3] (P-0.000). The parental satisfaction was good in patients who received block and poor in group NB.

Conclusion: Palatal block is technically simple, safe and effectively provides postoperative analgesia with good parental satisfaction. Injection of saline also produced palatal nerve block; however, the effect was not consistent.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.