Volume 18, Issue 2 pp. 113-118

Evaluation of cuffed tracheal tube size predicted using the Khine formula in children

CAROLINE DURACHER MD

CAROLINE DURACHER MD

Département d’Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale et SAMU de Paris, Université Rene Descartes Paris, Paris Cedex, France

Search for more papers by this author
EMMANUELLE SCHMAUTZ MD

EMMANUELLE SCHMAUTZ MD

Département d’Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale et SAMU de Paris, Université Rene Descartes Paris, Paris Cedex, France

Search for more papers by this author
CLAIRE MARTINON MD

CLAIRE MARTINON MD

Département d’Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale et SAMU de Paris, Université Rene Descartes Paris, Paris Cedex, France

Search for more papers by this author
JUDITH FAIVRE MD

JUDITH FAIVRE MD

Département d’Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale et SAMU de Paris, Université Rene Descartes Paris, Paris Cedex, France

Search for more papers by this author
PIERRE CARLI MD

PIERRE CARLI MD

Département d’Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale et SAMU de Paris, Université Rene Descartes Paris, Paris Cedex, France

Search for more papers by this author
GILLES ORLIAGUET MD PhD

GILLES ORLIAGUET MD PhD

Département d’Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale et SAMU de Paris, Université Rene Descartes Paris, Paris Cedex, France

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 November 2007
Citations: 52
Pr Gilles Orliaguet, Département d’Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale et SAMU de Paris, Université Paris Descartes, CHU Necker Enfants Malades, AP-HP, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75743 Paris Cedex 15, France (email: [email protected]).

Summary

Background: The correct size of cuffed endotracheal tube (CET) limits the risk of postintubation tracheal damage. The aim of this study was to compare the size of the CET used in children with the size predicted by the Khine formula [age (years)/4 + 3].

Methods: After ethical committee approval, 204 children aged 1 day–15 years were included prospectively in the study. The choice of the size of the CET was made at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. The main criterion of judgment was the comparison of the leak before and after inflating the cuff at a pressure of 20 cm·H2O. Demographic data, tracheal tube size used and that predicted by Khine’s formulae and side-effects were recorded.

Results: Overall, 21% of the CET were in accordance with the size predicted by the Khine formula. In the remaining patients, 72% were oversized and 7% undersized. In 12 cases, the size of CET chosen initially was modified: for a larger size in eight children and for a smaller size in four others. Six children (2.9%) presented with minor postoperative complications.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that Khine’s formula for predicting the appropriate tracheal tube size underestimates optimal size by 0.5 mm. We therefore recommend the use of the following formula: internal diameter of the CET = [age/4 + 3.5] in children >1 year of age which may be applied without increased risk of complications. The rate of tracheal reintubation as well as the detected leaks supports these recommendations.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.