Volume 53, Issue 3 pp. 345-349

Evaluation of growth and neurodevelopment in children with congenital heart disease

Selda Polat

Corresponding Author

Selda Polat

Department of Pediatrics

Selda Polat, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Mersin University Faculty of Medicine, 33079 Zeytinlibahce/Mersin, Turkey. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Cetin Okuyaz

Cetin Okuyaz

Department of Pediatric Neurology

Search for more papers by this author
Olgu Hallıoğlu

Olgu Hallıoğlu

Department of Pediatric Cardiology

Search for more papers by this author
Ertan Mert

Ertan Mert

Department of Family Medicine

Search for more papers by this author
Khatuna Makharoblidze

Khatuna Makharoblidze

Department of Pediatrics, Mersin University Faculty of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 August 2010
Citations: 16

Abstract

Background: Children with congenital heart disease are under risk of delayed growth and development. We evaluated physical growth parameters and neurodevelopment in these patients in comparison with normal children and examined the effect of hemodynamic status.

Methods: Patients with congenital heart disease (n= 76) and healthy children (n= 51) aged 1–72 months applied to Mersin University Hospital, Mersin, Turkey were included. Patients with heart failure and those requiring intervention or surgery were classified as hemodynamically impaired (HI group, n= 30), and the others, hemodynamically normal (HN group, n= 46). Growth parameters including weight, height, body mass index (BMI), mid-arm circumference (MAC), and triceps skin fold thickness (TSF) were measured and standard deviations (SD) were determined. Functional development was assessed by Denver Developmental Screening Test-II (DDST II).

Results: MAC and BMI values of the group with impaired hemodynamic status were significantly lower than the hemodynamically normal and control groups (MAC P < 0.05 and BMI P < 0.01). In the DDST II, the group with hemodynamic abnormality had more failures in gross motor and fine motor skills than HN group and controls (gross motor P= 0.011, P < 0.001 and fine motor P= 0.028, P= 0.001, respectively) and more failures in language development than the control group (P= 0.001).

Conclusion: The results showed the importance of hemodynamic status in growth and neurodevelopment of children with congenital heart disease. Besides routine growth parameters, more detailed examinations such as BMI, MAC, TSF, and developmental screening tests appear useful in identifying children with cardiac disease who are under risk for delayed growth and development.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.