Volume 15, Issue 6 pp. 952-960
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Diagnostic accuracy of a questionnaire and simple home monitoring device in detecting obstructive sleep apnoea in a Chinese population at high cardiovascular risk

Dashiell GANTNER

Dashiell GANTNER

The George Institute for International Health, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney,

Search for more papers by this author
Ji-Yong GE

Ji-Yong GE

Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,

Search for more papers by this author
Li-Hua LI

Li-Hua LI

Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,

Search for more papers by this author
Nick ANTIC

Nick ANTIC

Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Repatriation General Hospital and Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, and

Search for more papers by this author
Sam WINDLER

Sam WINDLER

Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Repatriation General Hospital and Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, and

Search for more papers by this author
Keith WONG

Keith WONG

Woolcock Institute of Medical Research and NHMRC Centre for Clinical Research Excellence in Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales,

Search for more papers by this author
Emma HEELEY

Emma HEELEY

The George Institute for International Health, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney,

Search for more papers by this author
Shao-Guang HUANG

Shao-Guang HUANG

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and

Search for more papers by this author
Ping CUI

Ping CUI

Ruijin 2nd Road Community Health Center, Luwan District, Shanghai, China

Search for more papers by this author
Craig ANDERSON

Craig ANDERSON

The George Institute for International Health, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney,

Search for more papers by this author
Ji-Guang WANG

Ji-Guang WANG

Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,

Search for more papers by this author
Doug MCEVOY

Corresponding Author

Doug MCEVOY

Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Repatriation General Hospital and Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, and

Doug McEvoy, Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, SA 5041, Australia. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 July 2010
Citations: 44

Conflict of interest statement: There were no conflicts of interest on the part of any authors or researchers involved in this study. D. McEvoy received funding from Respironics and equipment donations from ResMed and Compumedics for the research reported in this manuscript. The study sponsors had no role in study design, analysis, interpretation or manuscript writing.

ABSTRACT

Background and objective:  OSA is a common condition associated with cardiovascular (CV) morbidity. It remains underdiagnosed globally in part due to the limited availability and technical requirements of polysomnography (PSG). The aim of this study was to test the accuracy of two simple methods for diagnosing OSA.

Methods:  Consecutive subjects identified from a community register with high CV risk were invited to complete the Berlin Sleep Questionnaire and undergo simultaneous, home, overnight PSG and ApneaLink device oximetry and nasal pressure recordings. The relative accuracies of the Berlin Questionnaire, oximetry and nasal pressure results in diagnosing PSG-defined moderate-severe OSA were assessed.

Results:  Of 257 eligible high CV risk subjects enrolled, 190 completed sleep studies and 143 subjects' studies were of sufficient quality to include in final analyses. Moderate-severe OSA was confirmed in 43% of subjects. The Berlin Questionnaire had low overall diagnostic accuracy in this population. However, ApneaLink recordings of oximetry and nasal pressure areas had high diagnostic utility with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.933 and 0.933, respectively. At optimal diagnostic thresholds, oximetry and nasal pressure measurements had similar sensitivity (84% vs 86%) and specificity (84% vs 85%). Technical failure was lower for oximetry than nasal pressure (5.8% vs 18.9% of tests).

Conclusions:  In patients with high CV risk overnight single-channel oximetry and nasal pressure measurements may provide high diagnostic accuracy and offer an accessible alternative to full PSG.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.