Volume 11, Issue 4 pp. 366-373

Contributions of the Transplant Registry: The 2006 Annual Report of the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies (NAPRTCS)*

Jodi M. Smith

Jodi M. Smith

Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Donald M. Stablein

Donald M. Stablein

The EMMES Corporation, Potomac, MD, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ricardo Munoz

Ricardo Munoz

Hospital Infantil de México, Mexico City, Mexico

Search for more papers by this author
Diane Hebert

Diane Hebert

Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Ruth A. McDonald

Ruth A. McDonald

Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 March 2007
Citations: 221
Jodi M. Smith, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Tel.: +206-987-2524
Fax: +206-987-2636
E-mail: [email protected]
*

The North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Cooperative Studies (NAPRTCS) is supported by unrestricted educational grants from Novartis, AMGEN, and Genentech. The NAPRTCS is a voluntary collaborative effort comprising 150 pediatric renal disease treatment centers in the USA, Canada, Mexico, and Costa Rica.

Abstract

Abstract: This summary of the NAPRTCS 2006 Annual Report of the Transplant Registry highlights the significant impact the registry has had in advancing knowledge in pediatric renal transplantation worldwide. This cooperative group has collected clinical information on children undergoing a renal transplantation since 1987 and now includes over 150 participating medical centers in the USA, Canada, Mexico, and Costa Rica. Currently, the NAPRTCS transplant registry includes information on 9837 renal transplants in 8990 patients (NAPRTCS 2006 Annual Report). Since the first data analysis in 1989, NAPRTCS reports have documented marked improvements in outcome after renal transplantation in addition to identifying factors associated with both favorable and poor outcomes. The registry has served to document and influence practice patterns, clinical outcomes, and changing trends in renal transplantation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.