Volume 18, Issue s11 pp. 29-33

Comparison of histopathological characteristics of allograft biopsy between responder and non-responder to antiproteinuric effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)

Y Namba

Y Namba

 Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine

Search for more papers by this author
T Moriyama

T Moriyama

 School of Health and Sport Sciences, Osaka University

Search for more papers by this author
M Kyo

M Kyo

 Sakurabashi Circulate Organ Clinic

Search for more papers by this author
K Oka

K Oka

 Department of Pathology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Y Kokado

Y Kokado

 Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine

Search for more papers by this author
Y Shi

Y Shi

 Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine

Search for more papers by this author
R Imamura

R Imamura

 Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine

Search for more papers by this author
N Ichimaru

N Ichimaru

 Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine

Search for more papers by this author
A Okuyama

A Okuyama

 Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine

Search for more papers by this author
S Takahara

S Takahara

 Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 June 2004
Citations: 1
Dr Toshiki Moriyama, Department of Medical Science II, School of Health and Sport Sciences, Osaka University, 1-17 Machikaneyama-cho, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan.
Tel.: +81 6 6850 6011;
Fax: +81 6850 6040;
E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Abstract: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) has become recognized as agents that have renoprotective effects in the treatment of progressive renal diseases including post-transplant kidneys. Previously we demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of ACEI treatment on the hypertensive proteinuric post-transplant patients (N = 10) who had been followed up for 12 months. However, not all patients show good response in urinary protein reduction. We aimed to analyse the histopathological factor(s) affecting the responsiveness of proteinuria to ACEI treatment. Fourteen post-transplant patients with proteinuria who were treated with ACEI and underwent allograft biopsy were analysed. Eight patients showed 50% or more reduction in proteinuria (responder). The other 6 patients showed less (< 50%) reduction in proteinuria (non-responder). There was no difference in clinical characteristics (BP, renal function, donor age, recipient body mass index), dietary sodium or protein intake, and diuretic use between the two groups. As a histopathological characteristic, glomerular size in responder group was significantly larger than that in non-responder group. This suggests that the large glomerular size at least partly contributes to the responsiveness in urinary protein reduction to ACEI treatment in kidney allograft recipients with proteinuria.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.