Volume 17, Issue 4 pp. 500-510

Involving patients in treatment decisions – a delicate balancing act for Swedish dentists

Marta Röing DDS PhD

Marta Röing DDS PhD

Doctor, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Services Research, Uppsala University, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Inger Knutsson Holmström PhD RN

Inger Knutsson Holmström PhD RN

Professor, School of Health and Medicine, Örebro University, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 April 2012
Citations: 12
Marta Röing DDS, PhD
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences
Health Services Research
Uppsala University
Box 564
SE-751 22 Uppsala
Sweden
E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background This study focuses on patients’ participation in treatment decisions related to the delivery of oral health care in the social welfare state of Sweden. In 1985, the National Dental Service Act gave dental patients the right to take an active role in decisions regarding their treatment and, in doing so, strengthened them as consumers. Little is known how dentists in Sweden have adapted to this change.

Objective This study explores how dentists in Sweden perceive and experience involving patients in dental treatment decisions.

Design Data were collected from open-ended interviews with nineteen dentists, and an inductive qualitative content analysis was chosen to analyse the transcribed interviews.

Findings Involving patients in treatment decisions appeared to be delicate balancing acts between the ideals of patient involvement and the reality of how it is practised in Sweden. These balancing acts in turn revealed obstacles to patient involvement and the role that economy can play on the decisions of some patients regarding their treatment.

Conclusions This study has given insight into a relationship in which some dentists in Sweden find it hard to adapt to and change their professional role with patients who appear to act more as consumers. For these dentists, better practice of patient involvement may require adoption of a more consumerist approach. However, in situations where economy influences patients’ treatment choices, the ideals of patient involvement may remain unattainable.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.