Volume 394, Issue 4 pp. 1925-1935

Supergiant temperatures and linear radii from near-infrared interferometry

G. T. Van Belle

Corresponding Author

G. T. Van Belle

European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str 2., 85478 Garching, Germany

E-mail: [email protected] (GTvB); [email protected] (MJCE); [email protected] (AH)

Contact GvB for reprints.

Search for more papers by this author
M. J. Creech-Eakman

Corresponding Author

M. J. Creech-Eakman

Department of Physics, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801, USA

E-mail: [email protected] (GTvB); [email protected] (MJCE); [email protected] (AH)

Contact GvB for reprints.

Search for more papers by this author
A. Hart

Corresponding Author

A. Hart

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Denver, 2112 E. Wesley Avenue, Denver, CO 80208, USA

E-mail: [email protected] (GTvB); [email protected] (MJCE); [email protected] (AH)

Contact GvB for reprints.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 April 2009
Citations: 1

ABSTRACT

We present angular diameters for 42 Luminosity Class (LC) I stars and 32 LC II stars that have been interferometrically determined with the Palomar Testbed Interferometer. Derived values of radius and effective temperature are established for these objects, and an empirical calibration of these parameters for supergiants will be presented as a function of spectral type and colours. For the effective temperature versus (VK)0 colour, we find an empirical calibration with a median deviation of ΔT= 70 K in the range of 0.7 < (VK)0 < 5.1 for LC I stars; for LC II, the median deviation is ΔT= 120 K from 0.4 < (VK)0 < 4.3. Effective temperature as a function of spectral type is also calibrated from these data, but shows significantly more scatter than the TEFF versus (VK)0 relationship. No deviation of TEFF versus spectral type is seen for these high-luminosity objects relative to LC II giants. Directly determined diameters range up to 400 R, though are limited by poor distance determinations, which dominate the error estimates. These temperature and radii measures reflect a direct calibration of these parameters for supergiants from empirical means.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.