Volume 17, Issue 4 pp. 444-449

Does nasal decongestion improve obstructive sleep apnea?

CHRISTIAN F. CLARENBACH

CHRISTIAN F. CLARENBACH

Pulmonary Division, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich and Center for Integrative Human Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
MALCOLM KOHLER

MALCOLM KOHLER

Pulmonary Division, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich and Center for Integrative Human Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
OLIVER SENN

OLIVER SENN

Pulmonary Division, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich and Center for Integrative Human Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
ROBERT THURNHEER

ROBERT THURNHEER

Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital Munsterlingen, Munsterlingen, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
KONRAD E. BLOCH

KONRAD E. BLOCH

Pulmonary Division, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich and Center for Integrative Human Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 November 2008
Citations: 53
Konrad E. Bloch, MD, Pulmonary Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland. Tel.: +41-1-255 38 28; fax: +41-1-255 44 51; e-mail: [email protected]

Summary

Whether nasal congestion promotes obstructive sleep apnea is controversial. Therefore, we performed a randomized placebo-controlled cross-over trial on the effects of topical nasal decongestion in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) and nasal congestion. Twelve OSA patients with chronic nasal congestion (mean ± SD age 49.1 ± 11.1 years, apnea/hypopnea index 32.6 ± 24.5/h) were treated with nasal xylometazoline or placebo for 1 week each. At the end of treatment periods, polysomnography including monitoring of nasal conductance by an unobtrusive technique, vigilance by the OSLER test, and symptom scores were assessed. Data from xylometazoline and placebo treatments were compared. Mean nocturnal nasal conductance on xylometazoline was significantly higher than on placebo (8.6 ± 5.3 versus 6.3 ± 5.8 mL s−1Pa−1, P < 0.05) but the apnea/hypopnea index was similar (29.3 ± 32.5/h versus 33.2 ± 32.8/h, P = NS). However, 30–210 min after application of xylometazoline, at the time of the maximal pharmacologic effect, the apnea/hypopnea index was slightly reduced (27.3 ± 30.5/h versus 33.2 ± 33.9/h, P < 0.05). Xylometazoline did not alter sleep quality, sleep resistance time (33.6 ± 8.8 versus 33.4 ± 10.1 min, P = NS) and subjective sleepiness (Epworth score 10.5 ± 3.8 versus 11.8 ± 4.4, P = NS). The reduced apnea/hypopnea index during maximal nasal decongestion by xylometazoline suggests a pathophysiologic link but the efficacy of nasal decongestion was not sufficient to provide a clinically substantial improvement of OSA. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier is NTC006030474.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.