Volume 15, Issue 6 pp. 1061-1073

Making the AGREE tool more user-friendly: the feasibility of a user guide based on Boolean operators

N. Ann Scott PhD

Corresponding Author

N. Ann Scott PhD

Research Associate,

Dr N. Ann Scott
Institute of Health Economics
#1200, 10405 Jasper Avenue
Edmonton, AB
Canada T5J 3N4
E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Carmen Moga MD

Carmen Moga MD

Research Associate,

Search for more papers by this author
Christa Harstall MHSA

Christa Harstall MHSA

Director, Health Technology Assessment Unit, Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 December 2009
Citations: 12

Abstract

Rationale, aims and objectives The Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument is a generic tool for assessing guideline quality. This feasibility study aimed to reduce the ambiguity and subjectivity associated with AGREE item scoring, and to augment the tool's capacity to differentiate between good- and poor-quality guidelines.

Methods A literature review was conducted to ascertain what AGREE instrument adjustments had been reported to date. The AGREE User Guide was then modified by:

  • 1

    constructing a detailed set of instructions, or dictionary, using Boolean operators, and

  • 2

    overlaying seven criteria to categorize guideline quality.

The feasibility of the Boolean-based dictionary was tested by three appraisers using three randomly selected guidelines on low back pain management. The dictionary was then revised and re-tested.

Results Of the 52 published studies identified, 14% had modified the instrument by adding or deleting items and 35% had adopted strategies, such as using a consensus approach, to overcome inconsistencies and ensure identical item scoring among appraisers. For the feasibility test, Pearson correlation coefficients ranged from 0.27 to 0.81. Revision and re-testing of the dictionary increased the level of agreement (range 0.41 to 0.94). Application of the revised dictionary not only decreased the variability of the domain scores, but also reduced the tool's reliability among inexperienced appraisers.

Conclusion Appraisers found the Boolean-based AGREE User Guide easier to use than the original, which improved their confidence in the tool. Good reliability was achieved in the feasibility test, but the reliability and validity of some of the changes will require further evaluation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.