Characterizing the spatial distribution of giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) in fragmented forest landscapes
Tiejun Wang
Department of Natural Resources, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), PO Box 6, 7500 AA Enschede, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Xinping Ye
Department of Natural Resources, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), PO Box 6, 7500 AA Enschede, The Netherlands
Foping National Nature Reserve, No. 89 Huangjiawan Road, 723400 Foping, China
Xinping Ye, Foping National Nature Reserve, No. 89 Huangjiawan Road, 723400 Foping, China.E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAndrew K. Skidmore
Department of Natural Resources, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), PO Box 6, 7500 AA Enschede, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorAlbertus G. Toxopeus
Department of Natural Resources, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), PO Box 6, 7500 AA Enschede, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorTiejun Wang
Department of Natural Resources, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), PO Box 6, 7500 AA Enschede, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Xinping Ye
Department of Natural Resources, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), PO Box 6, 7500 AA Enschede, The Netherlands
Foping National Nature Reserve, No. 89 Huangjiawan Road, 723400 Foping, China
Xinping Ye, Foping National Nature Reserve, No. 89 Huangjiawan Road, 723400 Foping, China.E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAndrew K. Skidmore
Department of Natural Resources, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), PO Box 6, 7500 AA Enschede, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorAlbertus G. Toxopeus
Department of Natural Resources, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), PO Box 6, 7500 AA Enschede, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorThe third national giant panda survey was conducted via a dragnet investigation approach. The whole investigation area was plotted out with an average plot size of 2 km2. Each plot was surveyed through-out. In total 11,174 plots were surveyed (http://assets.panda.org/downloads/pandasurveyqa.doc).
Abstract
Aim To examine the effects of forest fragmentation on the distribution of the entire wild giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) population, and to propose a modelling approach for monitoring the spatial distribution and habitat of pandas at the landscape scale using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectro-radiometer (MODIS) enhanced vegetation index (EVI) time-series data.
Location Five mountain ranges in south-western China (Qinling, Minshan, Qionglai, Xiangling and Liangshan).
Methods Giant panda pseudo-absence data were generated from data on panda occurrences obtained from the third national giant panda survey. To quantify the fragmentation of forests, 26 fragmentation metrics were derived from 16-day composite MODIS 250-m EVI multi-temporal data and eight of these metrics were selected following factor analysis. The differences between panda presence and panda absence were examined by applying significance testing. A forward stepwise logistic regression was then applied to explore the relationship between panda distribution and forest fragmentation.
Results Forest patch size, edge density and patch aggregation were found to have significant roles in determining the distribution of pandas. Patches of dense forest occupied by giant pandas were significantly larger, closer together and more contiguous than patches where giant pandas were not recorded. Forest fragmentation is least in the Qinling Mountains, while the Xiangling and Liangshan regions have most fragmentation. Using the selected landscape metrics, the logistic regression model predicted the distribution of giant pandas with an overall accuracy of 72.5% (κ = 0.45). However, when a knowledge-based control for elevation and slope was applied to the regression, the overall accuracy of the model improved to 77.6% (κ = 0.55).
Main conclusions Giant pandas appear sensitive to patch size and isolation effects associated with fragmentation of dense forest, implying that the design of effective conservation areas for wild giant pandas must include large and dense forest patches that are adjacent to other similar patches. The approach developed here is applicable for analysing the spatial distribution of the giant panda from multi-temporal MODIS 250-m EVI data and landscape metrics at the landscape scale.
References
- Anderson, R.P., Gómez-Laverde, M.P. & Peterson, A.T. (2002) Geographical distributions of spiny pocket mice in South America: insights from predictive models. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11, 131–141.
- Bagan, H., Wang, Q.X., Watanabe, M., Yang, Y.H. & Ma, J.W. (2005) Land cover classification from MODIS EVI times-series data using SOM neural network. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26, 4999–5012.
- Barbosa, A.M., Real, R., Olivero, J. & Mario Vargas, J. (2003) Otter (Lutra lutra) distribution modeling at two resolution scales suited to conservation planning in the Iberian Peninsula. Biological Conservation, 114, 377–387.
-
Bissonette, J.A.E. (1997) Wildlife and landscape ecology: effects of pattern and scale. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
10.1007/978-1-4612-1918-7 Google Scholar
- Bonn, A. & Schroder, B. (2001) Habitat models and their transfer for single and multi species groups: a case study of carabids in an alluvial forest. Ecography, 24, 483–496.
- Brotons, L., Thuiller, W., Araújo, M.B. & Hirzel, A. (2004) Presence-absence versus presence-only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability. Ecography, 27, 437–448.
- Bulmer, M.G. (1967) Principles of statistics. Dover, New York.
- Byrne, G.F., Crapper, P.F. & Mayo, K.K. (1980) Monitoring land-cover change by principal component analysis of multitemporal Landsat data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 10, 175–184.
- Cain, D.H., Riitters, K. & Orvis, K. (1997) A multi-scale analysis of landscape statistics. Landscape Ecology, 12, 199–212.
- China Vegetation Compiling Committee (1980) China vegetation. Science Press, Beijing.
- Congalton, R. & Green, K. (1999) Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. CRC/Lewis Press, Boca Raton.
- Congalton, R.G. (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37, 35–46.
- Corsi, F., de Leeuw, J. & Skidmore, A.K. (2000) Modeling species distribution with GIS. Research techniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences (ed. by L. Boitani and T.K. Fuller), pp. 389–434. Columbia University Press, New York.
- Dufour, A., Gadallah, F., Wagner, H.H., Guisan, A. & Buttler, A. (2006) Plant species richness and environmental heterogeneity in a mountain landscape: effects of variability and spatial configuration. Ecography, 29, 573–584.
- Elton, C.S., Leibold, M.A. & Wootton, J.T. (2001) Animal ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Engler, R., Guisan, A. & Rechsteiner, L. (2004) An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 263–274.
- Field, A. (2005) Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage Publications, London.
- Fielding, A.H. & Bell, J.F. (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation, 24, 38–49.
- Frohn, R.C. (1998) Remote sensing for landscape ecology: new metric indicators for monitoring, modeling, and assessment of ecosystems. Lewis, Boca Raton.
- Games, P.A. & Howell, J.F. (1976) Pairwise multiple comparison procedures with unequal N’s and/or variances: a Monte Carlo study. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 113–125.
- Gao, X., Huete, A.R., Ni, W.G. & Miura, T. (2000) Optical–biophysical relationships of vegetation spectra without background contamination. Remote Sensing of Environment, 74, 609–620.
- Griffith, J.A., Martinko, E.A. & Price, K.P. (2000) Landscape structure analysis of Kansas at three scales. Landscape and Urban Planning, 52, 45–61.
- Groom, G., Mucher, C.A., Ihse, M. & Wrbka, T. (2006) Remote sensing in landscape ecology: experiences and perspectives in a European context. Landscape Ecology, 21, 391–408.
- Guisan, A. & Zimmermann, N.E. (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 135, 147–186.
- Gustafson, E.J. (1998) Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems, 1, 143–156.
- Hamazaki, T. (1996) Effects of patch shape on the number of organisms. Landscape Ecology, 11, 299–306.
- Hirzel, A.H., Helfer, V. & Metral, F. (2001) Assessing habitat-suitability models with a virtual species. Ecological Modelling, 145, 111–121.
-
Hosmer, D.W. &
Lemeshow, S. (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.
10.1002/0471722146 Google Scholar
- Hu, J. (2001) Research on the giant panda. Shanghai Scientific and Technological Education Publishers, Shanghai.
- Hu, J., Schaller, G.B., Pan, W. & Zhu, J. (1985) The giant panda in Wolong. Sichuan Science and Technology Press, Chengdu.
- Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, E.P., Gao, X. & Ferreira, L.G. (2002) Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 195–213.
- Hulshoff, R.M. (1995) Landscape indices describing a Dutch landscape. Landscape Ecology, 10, 101–111.
- ITT Industries Inc. (2006) ENVI (environment for visualizing images), version 4.3. ITT Industries Inc., Boulder, CO.
- Jiménez-Valverde, A. & Lobo, J.M. (2007) Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either–or presence–absence. Acta Oecologica, 31, 361–369.
- Jönsson, P. & Eklundh, L. (2004) TIMESAT – a program for analyzing time-series of satellite sensor data. Computers and Geosciences, 30, 833–845.
- Legendre, P. (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology, 74, 1659–1673.
- Leica Geosystems Geospatial Imaging (2005) ERDAS imagine 9.1. Leica Geosystems Geospatial Imaging, Norcross, GA.
- Lindburg, D.E. & Baragona, K.E. (2004) Giant pandas: biology and conservation. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
- Liu, J., Liu, M., Deng, X., Zhuang, D., Zhang, Z. & Luo, D. (2002) The land-use and land-cover change database and its relative studies in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 12, 275–282.
- Liu, J.Y., Zhuang, D.F., Luo, D. & Xiao, X. (2003) Land-cover classification of China: integrated analysis of AVHRR imagery and geophysical data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24, 2485–2500.
- Liu, X. & Kafatos, M. (2005) Land-cover mixing and spectral vegetation indices. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26, 3321–3327.
- Loucks, C.J. & Wang, H. (2004) Assessing the habitat and distribution of the giant panda: methods and issues. Panda 2000 (ed. by D.G. Lindburg and K. Baragona), pp. 317–321. University of California Press, San Diego, CA.
- McGarigal, K. & Cushman, S.A. (2002) Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecological Applications, 12, 335–345.
- Mladenoff, D.J., Sickley, T.A., Haight, R.G. & Wydeven, A.P. (1995) A regional landscape analysis and prediction of favorable gray wolf habitat in the northern Great Lakes region. Conservation Biology, 9, 279–294.
- Moran, P.A.P. (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37, 17–23.
- Morrison, M.L. (2001) A proposed research emphasis to overcome the limits of wildlife–habitat relationship studies. Journal of Wildlife Management, 65, 613–623.
- Olivier, F. & Wotherspoon, S. (2006) Modelling habitat selection using presence-only data: case study of a colonial hollow nesting bird, the snow petrel. Ecological Modelling, 195, 187–204.
- O’Neill, R.V., Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Sugihara, G., Jackson, B., Deangelis, D.L., Milne, B.T., Turner, M.G., Zygmunt, B., Christensen, S.W., Dale, V.H. & Graham, R.L. (1988) Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 1, 153–162.
- Pan, W. (2001) The opportunity of survival. Beijing University Press, Beijing.
- Pearce, J.L. & Boyce, M.S. (2006) Modelling distribution and abundance with presence-only data. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 405–412.
- Ren, Y. (1998) Vegetation within the giant panda’s habitat in Qinling Mountains. Shaanxi Science and Technology Press, Xi’an.
- Richards, J.A. (1984) Thematic mapping from multitemporal image data using the principal components transformation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 16, 25–46.
- Riitters, K.H., O’Neill, R.V., Hunsaker, C.T., Wickham, J.D., Yankee, D.H., Timmins, S.P., Jones, K.B. & Jackson, B.L. (1995) A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology, 10, 23–39.
- Saura, S. (2004) Effects of remote sensor spatial resolution and data aggregation on selected fragmentation indices. Landscape Ecology, 19, 197–209.
- Schaller, G. (1987) Bamboo shortage not only cause of panda decline. Nature, 327, 562.
- Skidmore, A.K., Watford, F., Luckananurug, P. & Ryan, P.J. (1996) An operational GIS expert system for mapping forest soils. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62, 501–511.
- Skinner, C.N. (1995) Change in spatial characteristics of forest openings in the Klamath Mountains of northwestern California, USA. Landscape Ecology, 10, 219–228.
- Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1994) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman, New York.
- SPSS Inc. (2006) SPSS 15 for Windows. SPSS Inc., Chicago.
- State Forestry Administration of China (2006) The third national survey report on giant panda in China. Science Press, Beijing.
- Story, M. & Congalton, R.G. (1986) Accuracy assessment: a user’s perspective. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 52, 397–399.
- Taylor, P.D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K. & Merriam, G. (1993) Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos, 68, 571–573.
- Turner, M.G., O’Neill, R.V., Gardner, R.H. & Milne, B.T. (1989) Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 3, 153–162.
- Turner, M.G., Gardner, R.H. & O’Neill, R.V. (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice: patterns and process. Springer, Berlin.
- Wardlow, B.D., Egbert, S.L. & Kastens, J.H. (2007) Analysis of time-series MODIS 250 m vegetation index data for crop classification in the U.S. Central Great Plains. Remote Sensing of Environment, 108, 290–310.
- Wu, J., Jelinski, D.E., Luck, M. & Tueller, P.T. (2000) Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: scale variance and pattern metrics. Geographical Information Science, 6, 6–19.
- Xavier, A.C., Rudorff, B.F.T., Berka, L.M.S. & Moreira, M.A. (2006) Multi-temporal analysis of MODIS data to classify sugarcane crop. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27, 755–768.
- Zaniewski, A.E., Lehmann, A. & Overton, J.M. (2002) Predicting species spatial distributions using presence-only data: a case study of native New Zealand ferns. Ecological Modelling, 157, 261–280.
