Volume 16, Issue 6 pp. 500-507

An examination of cancer patients’ monthly ‘out-of-pocket’ costs in Ontario, Canada

C.J. LONGO phd

Corresponding Author

C.J. LONGO phd

Assistant Professor, Strategic Market Leadership and Health Services Management, DeGroote School of Business (MGD-210), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,

Assistant Professor Christopher J. Longo, Strategic Market Leadership and Health Services Management, DeGroote School of Business (MGD-210), McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L8 (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
R. DEBER phd

R. DEBER phd

Professor, Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario,

Search for more papers by this author
M. FITCH phd

M. FITCH phd

Associate Professor, Faculty of Nursing, & Professor, Department of Graduate Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; Director of the Psychosocial & Behavioural Research Unit & Head of Oncology Nursing and Supportive Care, Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario,

Search for more papers by this author
A.P. WILLIAMS phd

A.P. WILLIAMS phd

Professor, Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario,

Search for more papers by this author
D. D’SOUZA md , frcpc

D. D’SOUZA md , frcpc

Radiation Oncologist, Victoria Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre; Assistant Professor & Director of Undergraduate Education in Oncology, Department of Oncology & Schulich, School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 September 2007
Citations: 81

Abstract

Ontario cancer patients’ monthly out-of-pocket costs (OOPC) were assessed to determine whether these costs were problematic. A self-administered questionnaire was administered to breast (n = 74), colorectal (n = 70), lung (n = 68) and prostate (n = 70) cancer patients between October 2001 and April 2003. It measured categorical OOPC, which were analysed using linear regression modelling, to determine whether any of a variety of independent variables influenced OOPC. Monthly OOPC (mean, range) were: parking/fares ($47, $0–450), devices ($46, $0–2350), prescription drugs ($45, $0–1400), accommodation ($43, $0–1500), complementary and alternative medicine ($29, $0–5000), vitamins ($25, $0–400), homemaking ($14, $0–1000), family care ($12, $0–1200), homecare ($2, $0–330) and other ($8, $0–250), with the total averaging $213 ($0–5230). Imputed travel mileage costs added $372 ($0–6180). Most patients were well served by the current healthcare programmes. In multivariate analysis, variables influencing several OOPC categories were: tumour site, hospitalization, age, and number of clinic trips. Travel costs proved the most problematic, with patients under 65 years and without insurance more likely to have high OOPC. Education and income were not reliable predictors for high OOPC. Many of these costs were for items not traditionally covered by public healthcare financing systems, raising important issues around defining ‘medically necessary’ care and the role of government.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.