Volume 29, Issue 2 pp. 169-174

The Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) and the Vocal Handicap Index (VHI): a comparison of structure and content

J.A. Wilson

J.A. Wilson

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Newcastle,

Search for more papers by this author
A. Webb

A. Webb

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Newcastle,

Search for more papers by this author
P.N. Carding

P.N. Carding

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Newcastle,

Search for more papers by this author
I.N. Steen

I.N. Steen

Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newscastle,

Search for more papers by this author
K. MacKenzie

K. MacKenzie

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, and

Search for more papers by this author
I.J. Deary

I.J. Deary

Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 April 2004
Citations: 107
Janet A. Wilson, Professor of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK (e-mail: [email protected]).

Presented in part at the 4th Congress of the European Laryngological Society, Brussels, September 2002.

Abstract

The Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) and the Vocal Handicap Index (VHI): a comparison of structure and content Self report measures of voice function are in frequent use, but have had inadequate psychometric evaluation. We aimed to perform a substantial factor analysis of two measures of voice impairment, the Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI). Both the 30-item questionnaires were completed by 319 dysphonic voice clinic attenders (99M, 220F). Principal components analysis confirmed that both instruments reflected general voice abnormality. The VoiSS comprised three factors – impairment (15 items), emotional (8 items) and related physical symptoms (7 items) – each with a good internal consistency. Analysis of the VHI suggested that it contains only two subscales. When a three-factor solution was imposed on the data, analysis failed to support the currently advised three 10-item subscale interpretations. Instead, we found a physical (voice impairment) domain (8 items), a psychosocial domain (14 items) and a factor with 8 items related to difficulty in being heard. The VHI requires further statistical refinement to identify its subscale structure. The VoiSS was developed from 800 subjects and is psychometrically the most robust and extensively validated self report voice measure available.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.