Volume 46, Issue 1 pp. 31-41

Dose-dependent Safety and Efficacy of Zonisamide: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study in Patients with Refractory Partial Seizures

Martin J. Brodie

Martin J. Brodie

Division of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Western Infirmary

Search for more papers by this author
Roderick Duncan

Roderick Duncan

West of Scotland Regional Epilepsy Service, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Herve Vespignani

Herve Vespignani

Universitaire Service de Neurologie, Hopital Central, Nancy Cedex, France

Search for more papers by this author
Andras Solyom

Andras Solyom

National Institute of Neurosurgery, Epilepsy Center, Budapest, Hungary

Search for more papers by this author
Valeriy Bitenskyy

Valeriy Bitenskyy

Department of Psychiatry, Odessa Medical University, Odessa, Ukraine

Search for more papers by this author
Cherry Lucas

Cherry Lucas

Elan Pharma Ltd, Stevenage, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 January 2005
Citations: 75
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. M.J. Brodie at Epilepsy Unit, Division of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, G11 6NT Scotland, U.K. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Summary: Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of zonisamide (ZNS) as adjunctive treatment in patients with refractory localization-related epilepsy.

Methods: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of adjunctive ZNS in 351 patients with refractory partial seizures receiving a stable regimen of one to three antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Patients were randomized to placebo or ZNS, 100 mg, 300 mg, or 500 mg/day (2:1:1:2) after a 12-week baseline. Dose titration was undertaken over a 6-week titration phase, which was followed by an 18-week fixed-dose assessment phase. Primary efficacy parameters were the differences between ZNS, 500 mg/day, and placebo in the change from baseline in frequency of complex partial (CP) seizures during the fixed-dose assessment phase and in the proportion of CP responders (≥50% decrease from baseline in seizure frequency). Safety and tolerability also were assessed.

Results: Compared with placebo, the highest dose of ZNS (500 mg/day) resulted in a significantly greater decrease in CP seizure frequency from baseline (51.2% vs. 16.3%; p < 0.0001) and a significantly higher proportion of CP responders (52.3% vs. 21.3%; p < 0.001). Both ZNS, 500 mg/day, and 300 mg/day were statistically superior to placebo in reducing the frequency of “all seizures” and simple partial (SP) + CP seizures. For all seizures, a significant dose–response relation was observed (p < 0.0001).The most common adverse events were somnolence, headache, dizziness, and nausea during the titration phase and headache and pharyngitis during the fixed-dose assessment phase.

Conclusions: ZNS provides dose-dependent, effective, and generally well-tolerated adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me