Managing hypogammaglobulinaemia secondary to haematological malignancies in Australia and New Zealand: a clinician survey
Abstract
Background
Acquired hypogammaglobulinaemia secondary to haematological malignancies is associated with increased infection risk. Immunoglobulin (Ig) replacement reduces major infections but not mortality, and is costly. No prospective randomised trials have compared Ig replacement with prophylactic antibiotics.
Aims
To identify variation in current practice regarding management of secondary hypogammaglobulinaemia in Australia and New Zealand, to identify barriers to best practice, and to inform the development of a clinical trial assessing antibiotic prophylaxis in secondary hypogammaglobulinaemia.
Methods
We conducted an online survey of current clinical practice regarding management of secondary hypogammaglobulinaemia among haematologists in Australia and New Zealand.
Results
Seventy-two haematologists responded; 89% of whom reported commencing Ig replacement for secondary hypogammaglobulinaemia in the setting of recurrent or severe infection. Most monitored trough immunoglobulin G levels, most often 3 monthly. Criteria for stopping Ig replacement varied. Most respondents recommended influenza and pneumococcal vaccination, while only 21% reported using antibiotic prophylaxis. Few respondents (3%) reported prescribing prophylactic antibiotics before commencing Ig replacement. Most reported an interest in recruiting patients to a clinical trial comparing Ig replacement with prophylactic antibiotics.
Conclusion
In comparison to limited international data, this survey finds variation in practice, which may be due to differences in local policies governing access to Ig. These findings highlight the need for research into the indications for Ig commencement and cessation, and will inform design of prospective trials of infection prevention in secondary hypogammaglobulinaemia.
