Response to Editorial Comments to Reporting trends and prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma: A population-based study
David M Berman M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Division of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorAtsunari Kawashima M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Division of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorYingwei Peng Ph.D.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorWilliam J Mackillop M.D.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorD Robert Siemens M.D.
Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorChristopher M Booth M.D.
Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorDavid M Berman M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Division of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorAtsunari Kawashima M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Division of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorYingwei Peng Ph.D.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorWilliam J Mackillop M.D.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorD Robert Siemens M.D.
Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorChristopher M Booth M.D.
Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this author
References
- 1 Tsuzuki T. Editorial Comment from Dr Tsuzuki to Reporting trends and prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma: a population-based study. Int. J. Urol. 2015; 22: 170–1.
- 2 Gondo T. Editorial Comment from Dr Gondo to Reporting trends and prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma: a population-based study. Int. J. Urol. 2015; 22: 171.
- 3 Lotan Y, Gupta A, Shariat SF et al. Lymphovascular invasion is independently associated with overall survival, cause-specific survival, and local and distant recurrence in patients with negative lymph nodes at radical cystectomy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005; 23: 6533–6539.
- 4 Amin MB, Trpkov K, Lopez-Beltran A et al. Immunohistochemistry in Diagnostic Urologic Pathology Group. Best practices recommendations in the application of immunohistochemistry in the bladder lesions: report from the International Society of Urologic Pathology consensus conference. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2014; 38: e20–34.
- 5 Berney DM, Wheeler TM, Grignon DJ et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 4: seminal vesicles and lymph nodes. Mod. Pathol. 2011; 24: 39–47.
- 6 Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, ISUP Grading Committee. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2005; 29: 1228–1242.
- 7 Magi-Galluzzi C, Evans AJ, Delahunt B et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease. Mod. Pathol. 2011; 24: 26–38.
- 8 Tan PH, Cheng L, Srigley JR et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins. Mod. Pathol. 2011; 24: 48–57.
