Volume 75, Issue 7 e14184
ORIGINAL PAPER

Efficacy and safety of tamsulosin vs its combination with mirabegron in the management of lower urinary tract non-neurogenic overactive bladder symptoms (OABS) because of Benign Prostatic Enlargement (BPE)-An open label randomised controlled clinical study

Iqbal Singh

Corresponding Author

Iqbal Singh

Department of Surgery (Urology), University College of Medical Sciences (University of Delhi) & GTB Hospital, Delhi, India

Correspondence

Iqbal Singh, Department of Surgery (Urology), University College of Medical Sciences, (University of Delhi), F-14 NDSE-2, New Delhi-110049. India.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Dibya P. Behera

Dibya P. Behera

Department of Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences (University of Delhi) & GTB Hospital, Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Aravind T.K

Aravind T.K

Department of Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences (University of Delhi) & GTB Hospital, Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Sanjay Gupta

Sanjay Gupta

Department of Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences (University of Delhi) & GTB Hospital, Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 March 2021
Citations: 1

Abstract

PURPOSE

The efficacy and safety of βeta-3 agonists (Mirabegron 50 mg) have been sparingly assessed in the published English literature. We aim to do an efficacy-safety analysis of Mirabegron-Tamsulosin combination therapy vs tamsulosin-placebo monotherapy in a select subset of medication virgin Benign Prostatic Enlargement (BPE) patients with coexisting predominant non-neurogenic overactive bladder symptoms (OABS).

METHODS

After prior written informed consent and IEC, 80 patients of uncomplicated BPE with coexisting non-neurogenic OABS and IPSS of >7 without contraindications to drug therapy were computer randomised/allocated to receive either[50 mg Mirabegron plus Tamsulosin 0.4 mg (Intervention arm-I)]or [Tamsulosin 0.4 mg plus capsule lactobacillus (Comparator arm-II)] once daily for 8 weeks. Efficacy was evaluated using the OABS Score (OABSS), mean change in nocturnal frequency (NF), PVR and IPSS, while safety was assessed by recording treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE). Follow-up visits were performed at second, fourth and eighth week.

RESULTS

Patient data in both groups were generally comparable with the exception of NF and IPSS storage sub score (IPSS-ss). Significant improvements were visualised in the eighth week primary endpoint total OABS sub score (OABSS-ss) in the combination group (P < .001).Similar significant improvements were seen with most secondary parameters such as the mean change in NF, IPSS, IPSS-ss, OABS-ss, voided volume, Qmax, and Quality of life index (QOL) (P < .001). No significant increase in PVR was observed in the Mirabegron arm and no patient developed urinary retention. The TEAE were minor, self-limiting and managed symptomatically without drug discontinuity.

CONCLUSION

Mirabegron can be significantly efficacious and safe in ameliorating non-neurogenic OABS induced by BPE vs placebo by initiating combination therapy from the start as opposed to the usual ‘add on therapy’ protocol. This combination appeared to be superior in terms of overall safety, minimal side effects, better compliance and tolerability vs Tamsulosin monotherapy in select BPE patients with predominant non-neurogenic OABS.

DISCLOSURES

The authors further declare that we have nothing to disclose and have no direct or indirect commercial and or financial incentive associated with this research.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.