Volume 28, Issue 2 pp. 414-422
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Surviving versus living life: Capabilities and service use among adults with mental health problems and histories of homelessness

Nick Kerman PhD Candidate

Corresponding Author

Nick Kerman PhD Candidate

School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Correspondence

Nick Kerman, School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1N 6N5.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
John Sylvestre PhD

John Sylvestre PhD

Centre for Research on Educational and Community Services, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 October 2019
Citations: 23

Funding information

Financial support for this study was provided to the lead author by Mental Health Research Canada (MHRC). The MHRC did not have any role in the development of the study, analysis or interpretation of the data, or in the preparation of the manuscript.

Abstract

The capabilities approach is a framework that can be applied to marginalised populations, including people with mental health problems and histories of homelessness, to measure well-being. Although a range of health and social services exist to address the many challenges associated with mental health problems and homelessness, the extent to which these services impact capabilities is unknown. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of people with mental health problems and histories of homelessness to understand how they perceived their service use as affecting their capabilities. In-depth interviews were conducted over a 1-year period beginning in October 2016 with 52 adults with mental health problems who were currently or formerly homeless and living in Ottawa, Canada. Data were analysed using first and second cycle coding, which involved line-by-line, descriptive coding followed by focused coding to categorise the data within a broadly applied capabilities framework. Findings showed that participants perceived many capability impairments in their lives, including nutritious food scarcities, limited material rights, social role deprivations, social isolation and insufficient income to participate in recreational activities. Services used by participants had mixed, for better and worse, and limited effects on their capabilities (e.g., unable to overcome affordable housing shortages or financial barriers associated with some capability impairments). Furthermore, service use could promote one capability while hindering another, forcing people to choose between competing needs when using services. Overall, the capabilities approach offers a comprehensive, human rights-based framework that is relevant to people with mental health problems and histories of homelessness but the services used by this population primarily help people to survive life but not necessarily live life.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No conflicts of interest have been declared.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.