Perceptions towards disability among social work students in Israel: Development and validation of a new scale
Corresponding Author
Roni Holler PhD
Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
Correspondence
Roni Holler, Paul Baerwald School of Social Work & Social Welfare, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorShirli Werner PhD
Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Roni Holler PhD
Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
Correspondence
Roni Holler, Paul Baerwald School of Social Work & Social Welfare, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorShirli Werner PhD
Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Over the last decades, the disability movement has been advocating for a paradigmatic shift in how disability is perceived and managed: from a medical or individual perspective focusing on the person's body and mind to a social perspective emphasizing the context and barriers of disability. However, we still know little about the perceptions of helping professionals, particularly social workers who work closely with disabled people. Thus, the aim of the current study is to develop and validate a scale—Perceptions Toward Disability Scale (PTDS)—to measure how social workers view disability: as an individual or social category. This paper describes the three phases of the scale's construction. First, scale items were formulated and its content validity was examined. Next, a pilot of 30 social workers completed a questionnaire and an initial exploratory factor analysis was conducted. In the third and main phase, the final draft was completed in 2016 by 565 Israeli social work students to assess its psychometric properties. Both exploratory and confirmatory factorial validity and discriminant validity analyses were conducted. The results of a confirmatory factor analysis revealed two distinct factors: an individual perspective of disability comprised of eight items (α = 0.77) and a social perspective of disability comprised of ten (α = 0.66). Subsequent analyses supported the scale's discriminant validity as indicated by the lack of an association between the Attitude Toward Disabled Persons Scale (ATDP) and the social model subscale (r = .13, p = .19) and by the weak negative relation with the individual model subscale (r = −.25, p = .01). These findings show that the PTDS possesses promising construct validity and provide support for its utility. This easy-to-administer instrument offers several practical benefits and can serve as a framework for further empirical research regarding social work practice with disabled people.
REFERENCES
- Anastasiou, D., & Kauffman, J. M. (2013). The social model of disability: Dichotomy between impairment and disability. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 38, 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jht026
10.1093/jmp/jht026 Google Scholar
- Aron, L., & Loprest, P. (2012). Disability and the education system. The Future of Children, 22, 97–122.
- Au, K. W., & Man, D. W. (2006). Attitudes toward people with disabilities: A comparison between health care professionals and students. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 29, 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mrr.0000210048.09668.ab
- Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2006). Independent futures: Creating user-led disability services in a disabling society ( C. J, Ed.). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
10.2307/j.ctt9qgmh3 Google Scholar
- Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2010). Exploring disability. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
- Bean, K. F., & Hedgpeth, J. (2014). The effect of social work education and self-esteem on students’ social discrimination of people with disabilities. Social Work Education, 33, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2012.740454
10.1080/02615479.2012.740454 Google Scholar
- Beresford, P. (2007). User involvement, research and health inequalities: Developing new directions. Health & Social Care in the Community, 15, 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00688.x
- Beresford, P., & Croft, S. (2001). Service users’ knowledges and the social construction of social work. Journal of Social Work, 1, 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/146801730100100304
10.1177/146801730100100304 Google Scholar
- British Association of Social Workers. (2016). Disabled adults and social workers (position statement). Birmingham, UK: British Association of Social Workers.
- Byng, S., & Duchan, J. F. (2005). Social model philosophies and principles: Their applications to therapies for aphasia. Aphasiology, 19, 906–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030544000128
- Chappell, A. L., Goodley, D., & Lawthom, R. (2001). Making connections: The relevance of the social model of disability for people with learning difficulties. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3156.2001.00084.x
10.1046/j.1468-3156.2001.00084.x Google Scholar
- Cheatham, L. P., Abell, N., & Kim, H. (2015). Development and validation of the social worker's attitudes toward disability scale. Journal of Social Work Education, 51, 379–397.
- Child, D. (2006). The essentials of factor analysis. London, UK: A&C Black.
- Coppus, A. M. W. (2013). People with intellectual disability: What do we know about adulthood and life expectancy? Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 18, 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.1123
- Dutta, A., Gervey, R., Chan, F., Chou, C. C., & Ditchman, N. (2008). Vocational rehabilitation services and employment outcomes for people with disabilities: A United States study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18, 326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-008-9154-z
- Emerson, E. (2007). Poverty and people with intellectual disabilities. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20144
- French, S., & Swain, J. (2004). Whose tragedy? Towards a personal non-tragedy view of disability. London, UK: Sage.
- Freund, P. (2001). Bodies, disability and spaces: The social model and disabling spatial organizations. Disability & Society, 16, 689–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590120070079
- Gal, J., & Weiss-Gal, I. (2011). Social policy formulation and the role of professionals: The involvement of social workers in parliamentary committees in Israel. Health & Social Care in the Community, 19, 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00955.x
- Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., De Graaf, M., & Karels, L. (2010). Psychological intervention targets for people with visual impairments: The importance of cognitive coping and goal adjustment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32, 142–147. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638280903071859
- George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update ( 10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Gilson, S. F., & DePoy, E. (2002). Theoretical approaches to disability content in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 153–165.
- Hancock, T. U., Waites, C., & Kledaras, C. G. (2012). Facing structural inequality: Students’ orientation to oppression and practice with oppressed groups. Journal of Social Work Education, 48, 5–25.
- Haskell, R. A. (2010). Evaluating social work students’ attitudes toward physical disability. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/1655
- Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial scale development: Sample size for pilot studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 394–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355692
- Jones, M. K. (2008). Disability and the labour market: A review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Studies, 35, 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443580810903554
10.1108/01443580810903554 Google Scholar
- Kanter, A. S. (2014). The development of disability rights under international law: From charity to human rights. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
10.4324/9780203711712 Google Scholar
- Krumer-Nevo, M., & Weiss, I. (2006). Factors affecting the interest of Israeli social work students in working with different client groups. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 443–464.
- Loehlin, J. C. (1998). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Meekosha, H. (2004). Drifting down the Gulf Stream: Navigating the cultures of disability studies. Disability & Society, 19, 721–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759042000284204
- Meekosha, H., & Dowse, L. (2007). Integrating critical disability studies into social work education and practice: An Australian perspective. Practice, 19, 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503150701574267
10.1080/09503150701574267 Google Scholar
- Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practicing within the disciplines. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
- Morgan, H. (2012). The social model of disability as a threshold concept: Troublesome knowledge and liminal spaces in social work education. Social Work Education, 31, 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2012.644964
10.1080/02615479.2012.644964 Google Scholar
- OECD (2010). Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers: A synthesis of findings across OECD countries. Paris: Author.
10.1787/9789264088856-en Google Scholar
- Oliver, M., & Barnes, C. (2012). The new politics of disablement. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.1007/978-0-230-39244-1 Google Scholar
- Oliver, M., Sapey, B., & Thomas, P. (2012). Social work with disabled people. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.1007/978-1-137-02427-5 Google Scholar
- Ostapczuk, M., & Musch, J. (2011). Estimating the prevalence of negative attitudes towards people with disability: A comparison of direct questioning, projective questioning and randomised response. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33, 399–411. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.492067
- Phelan, S. K. (2011). Constructions of disability: A call for critical reflexivity in occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 78, 164–172. https://doi.org/10.2182/cjot.2011.78.3.4
- Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29, 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
- Rimmerman, A. (2013). Social inclusion of people with disabilities: National and international perspectives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Roulstone, A. (2012). ‘Stuck in the middle with you’: Towards enabling social work with disabled people. Social Work Education, 31, 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2012.644942
10.1080/02615479.2012.644942 Google Scholar
- Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research, 27, 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/27.2.94
- Rummery, K. (2006). Disabled citizens and social exclusion: The role of direct payments. Policy & Politics, 34, 633–650. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557306778553132
- Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Schur, L., & Adya, M. (2013). Sidelined or mainstreamed? Political participation and attitudes of people with disabilities in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 94, 811–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2012.00885.x
- Shakespeare, T. (2008). Disability: Suffering, social oppression, or complex predicament? predicament? In D. Marcus, C. Rehmann-Sutter, & D. Mieth (Eds.), The contingent nature of life: Bioethics and limits of human existence (pp. 235–246). Houten, Holland: Springer.
10.1007/978-1-4020-6764-8_20 Google Scholar
- Shakespeare, T. (2013). Disability rights and wrongs revisited. New York: Routledge.
10.4324/9781315887456 Google Scholar
- She, P., & Livermore, G. A. (2009). Long-term poverty and disability among working-age adults. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 19, 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207308314954
10.1177/1044207308314954 Google Scholar
- Sims, D., & Cabrita Gulyurtlu, S. S. (2014). A scoping review of personalisation in the UK: Approaches to social work and people with learning disabilities. Health & Social Care in the Community, 22, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12048
- Sun, A. P. (2001). Perceptions among social work and non-social work students concerning causes of poverty. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 161–173.
- Swain, J., & French, S. (2000). Towards an affirmation model of disability. Disability & Society, 15, 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590050058189
- Vanhala, L. (2006). Fighting discrimination through litigation in the UK: The social model of disability and the EU anti-discrimination directive. Disability & Society, 21, 551–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590600786801
- Vehmas, S., & Watson, N. (2014). Moral wrongs, disadvantages, and disability: A critique of critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 29, 638–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.831751
- Vilchinsky, N., & Findler, L. (2004). Attitudes toward Israel's Equal Rights for People with Disabilities Law: A multiperspective approach. Rehabilitation Psychology, 49, 309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.831751
- Weiss, I., & Gal, J. (2006). Poverty in the eyes of the beholder: Social workers compared to other middle-class professionals. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl340
- Weiss-Gal, I. (2008). The person-in-environment approach: Professional ideology and practice of social workers in Israel. Social Work, 53, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/53.1.65
- Werner, S. (2011). Assessing female students’ attitudes in various health and social professions toward working with people with autism: A preliminary study. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25, 131–137. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2010.515043
- Werner, S. (2012). Intention to work with individuals with dual diagnosis: Testing the theory of planned behavior among students from various professions. Health & Social Work, 37, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hls010
- Werner, S., & Grayzman, A. (2011). Factors influencing the intention of students to work with individuals with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2502–2510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.010
- Werner, S., & Scior, K. (2016). Interventions aimed at tackling intellectual disability stigma: What works and what still needs to be done. In K. Scior, & S. Werner (Eds.), Intellectual disability and stigma (pp. 129–147). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.1057/978-1-137-52499-7_9 Google Scholar
- Yuker, H., Block, J., & Young, H. (1966). The measurement of attitudes toward people with disabilities. Albertson, NY: Human Resources Center.
- Zaidi, A., & Burchardt, T. (2005). Comparing incomes when needs differ: Equivalization for the extra costs of disability in the UK. Review of Income and Wealth, 51, 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2005.00146.x
10.1111/j.1475-4991.2005.00146.x Google Scholar
- Zaviršek, D. (2008). Social work with adults with disabilities: An international perspective. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 1393–1405. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp083