Volume 67, Issue 4 pp. 538-547
Original Article

Phosphohistone H3 outperforms Ki67 as a marker of outcome for breast cancer patients

Zac Gerring

Zac Gerring

Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand

Neurogenetics Laboratory, Genetics and Computational Biology Division, QIMR Berghofer Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Qld, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
John F Pearson

John F Pearson

Biostatistics and Computational Biology Unit, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
Helen R Morrin

Helen R Morrin

Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
Bridget A Robinson

Bridget A Robinson

Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand

Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Service, Christchurch, New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
Gavin C Harris

Gavin C Harris

Department of Anatomical Pathology, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
Logan C Walker

Corresponding Author

Logan C Walker

Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand

Address for correspondence: L Walker. Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Christchurch PO Box 8140, Christchurch, New Zealand. e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 February 2015
Citations: 21

Abstract

Aims

The proliferation marker Ki67 has been extensively investigated as a prognostic factor in breast cancer, but has not gained widespread clinical acceptance. Phosphohistone H3 is a new immunohistochemical marker for quantifying mitoses; however, there is limited information on its prognostic value in breast cancer. In this study, we performed a head-to-head comparison of Ki67 and phosphohistone H3 to establish the marker with the greatest prognostic value.

Methods and results

Tissue microarrays from 108 breast cancer patients were immunohistochemically stained for Ki67 and phosphohistone H3. Our results showed that phosphohistone H3 had a greater prognostic value than Ki67 in a multivariable model that adjusted for traditional prognostic variables in breast cancer. Phosphohistone H3 staining was a stronger predictor of survival at 5 years after diagnosis [hazard ratio (HR) 4.35, P < 10−5] than Ki67 (HR 2.44, P = 0.004), and better separated the risk of death in patients aged >45 years. Importantly, phosphohistone H3 consistently showed strong unequivocal staining, in contrast to the variable staining intensities associated with Ki67.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that phosphohistone H3 staining is a stronger and more robust prognostic indicator than Ki67 staining in breast cancer patients, and has the potential for use in routine diagnostic laboratories.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.