Volume 65, Issue 4 pp. 473-482
Original Article

Evaluation of fluorescence in-situ hybridization in monomorphic endometrial stromal neoplasms and their histological mimics: a review of 49 cases

Colin J R Stewart

Corresponding Author

Colin J R Stewart

Department of Histopathology, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia

School of Women's and Infants Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia

Address for correspondence: Dr C J R Stewart, Department of Histopathology, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Bagot Road, Perth, WA 6008, Australia. e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Yee C Leung

Yee C Leung

School of Women's and Infants Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Ashleigh Murch

Ashleigh Murch

Department of Diagnostic Genomics, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Perth, WA, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Joanne Peverall

Joanne Peverall

Department of Diagnostic Genomics, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Perth, WA, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 March 2014
Citations: 44

Abstract

Aims

To perform a population-based review of monomorphic endometrial stromal tumours and their histological mimics presenting over a 20-year period, including an evaluation of fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) for the JAZF1 and YWHAE breakaparts.

Methods and results

Forty-nine tumours were examined, comprising 13 histological mimics and 36 endometrial stromal tumours [six stromal nodules (ESNs), 25 low-grade stromal sarcomas (ESSs), and five monomorphic undifferentiated sarcomas (mUESs)]. Nine ESSs showed variant histological patterns, including smooth muscle, sex cord-like/glandular, fibrous or rhabdoid differentiation. Three ESSs were initially misclassified as benign uterine lesions, and, conversely, three benign mimics were originally reported as ESSs. One mUES showed a prominent pseudopapillary pattern. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization demonstrated JAZF1 breakaparts in five of six ESNs and 16 of 25 ESSs; however, only three of nine ESS variants were positive. YWHAE breakaparts were present in four of five mUESs. Analysis of a subsequent metastasis in the YWHAE breakapart-negative mUES demonstrated a YWHAE deletion. None of the histological mimics was positive in FISH analysis. Diffuse cyclin D1 expression was restricted to mUESs in this series.

Conclusions

Endometrial stromal neoplasms continue to present diagnostic difficulty. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis is helpful in distinguishing stromal tumours from their histological mimics and in distinguishing ESS from mUES.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.