Volume 8, Issue 3 pp. 524-538
Original Research

CO2 uptake is offset by CH4 and N2O emissions in a poplar short-rotation coppice

Terenzio Zenone

Corresponding Author

Terenzio Zenone

Department of Biology, Centre of Excellence PLECO, Plant and Vegetation Ecology, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, B-2610 Belgium

Correspondence: Terenzio Zenone, tel. + 32 3-265 2831,

fax + 32 3-265 2271, e-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Donatella Zona

Donatella Zona

Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Ilya Gelfand

Ilya Gelfand

W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, 3700 Gull lake drive E, Hickory Corners, MI 49060, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Bert Gielen

Bert Gielen

Department of Biology, Centre of Excellence PLECO, Plant and Vegetation Ecology, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, B-2610 Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Marta Camino-Serrano

Marta Camino-Serrano

Department of Biology, Centre of Excellence PLECO, Plant and Vegetation Ecology, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, B-2610 Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Reinhart Ceulemans

Reinhart Ceulemans

Department of Biology, Centre of Excellence PLECO, Plant and Vegetation Ecology, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, B-2610 Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 April 2015
Citations: 21

Abstract

The need for renewable energy sources will lead to a considerable expansion in the planting of dedicated fast-growing biomass crops across Europe. These are commonly cultivated as short-rotation coppice (SRC), and currently poplar (Populus spp.) is the most widely planted. In this study, we report the greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) measured using eddy covariance technique in an SRC plantation for bioenergy production. Measurements were made during the period 2010–2013, that is, during the first two rotations of the SRC. The overall GHG balance of the 4 years of the study was an emission of 1.90 (±1.37) Mg CO2eq ha−1; this indicated that soil trace gas emissions offset the CO2 uptake by the plantation. CH4 and N2O contributed almost equally to offset the CO2 uptake of −5.28 (±0.67) Mg CO2eq ha−1 with an overall emission of 3.56 (±0.35) Mg CO2eq ha−1 of N2O and of 3.53 (±0.85) Mg CO2eq ha−1 of CH4. N2O emissions mostly occurred during one single peak a few months after the site was converted to SRC; this peak comprised 44% of the total N2O loss during the two rotations. Accurately capturing emission events proved to be critical for deriving correct estimates of the GHG balance. The nitrogen (N) content of the soil and the water table depth were the two drivers that best explained the variability in N2O and CH4, respectively. This study underlines the importance of the ‘non-CO2 GHGs’ on the overall balance. Further long-term investigations of soil trace gas emissions should monitor the N content and the mineralization rate of the soil, as well as the microbial community, as drivers of the trace gas emissions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.