ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Positioning push–pull boundary in a hesitant fuzzy environment
Seyedeh Roya Pournamazi,
R. Ghasemy Yaghin,
Fariborz Jolai,
Seyedeh Roya Pournamazi
Textile Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
R. Ghasemy Yaghin
Textile Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Correspondence
R. Ghasemy Yaghin, Textile Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorFariborz Jolai
Industrial Engineering School, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Search for more papers by this authorSeyedeh Roya Pournamazi,
R. Ghasemy Yaghin,
Fariborz Jolai,
Seyedeh Roya Pournamazi
Textile Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
R. Ghasemy Yaghin
Textile Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Correspondence
R. Ghasemy Yaghin, Textile Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorFariborz Jolai
Industrial Engineering School, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Nowadays, fierce competition enforces supply chain planners to develop market-oriented production strategies. Customer order decoupling point (CODP) could increase the supply chain efficiency and responsiveness simultaneously. The right position of CODP in production industries will result in a pattern for trade-off between responsiveness and operational efficiency. The purpose of this paper is to address the positioning problem of a push-pull boundary in a fuzzy hesitant environment. To this end, a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making methodology of analytic network process (ANP) and VIKOR is proposed in a hesitant judgement environment to determine the position of CODP in a supply chain. Finally, CODP positioning in the apparel supply chain, as an industry-based example, is analysed to show the applicability of the proposed method.
REFERENCES
- Aguaron, J., & Moreno-Jiménez, J. M. (2003). The geometric consistency index: Approximated thresholds. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1), 137–145.
- Ahmadi, M., & Teimouri, E. (2008). Determining the order penetration point in auto export supply chain by the use of dynamic programming. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8(18), 3214–3220.
10.3923/jas.2008.3214.3220 Google Scholar
- Aktan, H. E., & Akyuz, G. (2017). Positioning the decoupling point along a supply chain: A case study. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 22(3), 309–339.
10.1504/IJPQM.2017.087302 Google Scholar
- Azimi, R., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Fooladgar, M. M., & Basiri, M. H. (2011). Evaluating the strategies of the Iranian mining sector using an integrated model. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 6(6), 459–466.
10.1080/17509653.2011.10671196 Google Scholar
- Bahraminasab, M., Sahari, B. B., Edwards, K. L., Farahmand, F., Jahan, A., Hong, T. S., & Arumugam, M. (2014). On the influence of shape and material used for the femoral component pegs in knee prostheses for reducing the problem of aseptic loosening. Materials & Design, 55, 416–428.
- Bryson, N. (1995). A goal programming method for generating priority vectors. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46, 641–648.
- Büyüközkan, G., & Görener, A. (2015). Evaluation of product development partners using an integrated AHP-VIKOR model. Kybernetes, 44(2), 220–237.
- Chou, W. C., & Cheng, Y. P. (2012). A hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating website quality of professional accounting firms. DM Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2783–2793.
- Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Sowinski, R. (2013). Multiple criteria hierarchy process with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE. Omega, 41, 820–846.
- Crawford, G., & Williams, C. (1985). A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29, 387–405.
- D'Alessandro, A. J., & Baveja, A. (2000). Divide and conquer: Rohm and Haas' response to a hanging speciality chemicals market. Interfaces, 30(6), 1–16.
- Darvishi, F., Ghasemy Yaghin, R., & Sadeghi, A. (2020). Integrated fabric procurement and multi-site apparel production planning with cross-docking: A hybrid fuzzy-robust stochastic programming approach. Applied Soft Computing, 92, 106267.
- Das, S., & Chakraborty, S. (2011). Selection of non-traditional machining processes using analytic network process. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 30(1), 41–53.
- Dincer, H., & Yuksel, S. (2019). An integrated stochastic fuzzy MCDM approach to the balanced scorecard-based service evaluation. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 166, 93–112.
- Dong, Y., Zhang, G., Hong, W. C., & Xu, Y. (2010). Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method. Decision Support Systems, 49(3), 281–289.
- Ebrahimnejad, S., Mousavi, S. M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Hashemi, H., & Vahdani, B. (2012). A modern two-phase group decision-making approach for construction project selection in a fuzzy environment. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(9), 4197–4217.
- Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J., & Greco, S. (2010). Trends in multiple criteria decision analysis. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
- J. Figueira, S. Greco, & M. Ehrgott (Eds.). (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art survey. Boston, MA: Springer.
10.1007/b100605 Google Scholar
- Fisher, M. (1997). What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Business Review, 75(2), 105–116.
- Ghasemy Yaghin, R., Fatemi Ghomi, S. M. T., & Torabi, S. A. (2015). A hybrid credibility-based fuzzy multiple objective optimization to differential pricing and inventory policies with arbitrage consideration. International Journal of Systems Science, 46(14), 2628–2639.
- Giesberts, P. M. J., & Van der Tang, L. (1992). Dynamics of the customer order decoupling point: Impact on information systems for production control. Production Planning and Control, 3(3), 300–313.
10.1080/09537289208919402 Google Scholar
- Gómez, J., Iván, D., Henao Arango, R., & Sarache, W. (2017). Multicriteria methodology for decoupling point placement in manufacturing systems. Ingeniería y Desarrollo, 35(1), 102–131.
- Hemmati, S., & Rabbani, M. (2010). Make-to-order/make-to-stock partitioning decision using the analytic network process. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 48(5-8), 801–813.
- Hemmati, S., Rabbani, M., Ebadian, M. (2009, November). Positioning of order penetrating point in hybrid MTS/MTO environments. Paper presented at: Third UKSim European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation, 2009. EMS'09. pp. 263–268. IEEE.
- Hsu, C. W., Kuo, R. J., & Chiou, C. Y. (2014). A multi-criteria decision-making approach for evaluating carbon performance of suppliers in the electronics industry. International journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 11(3), 775–784.
- Hung, Y. H., Chou, S. C. T., & Tzeng, G. H. (2011). Knowledge management adoption and assessment for SMEs by a modern MCDM approach. Decision Support Systems, 51(2), 270–291.
- Ishizaka, A., & Lusti, M. (2004). An expert module to improve the consistency of AHP matrices. International Transactions in Operational Research, 11(1), 97–105.
10.1111/j.1475-3995.2004.00443.x Google Scholar
- Lehtonen, J. M. (1999). Choice of order penetration point in the Nordic paper industry environment. Paperi Ja Puu, 81(3), 169–199.
- Li, H. L., & Ma, L. C. (2007). Detecting and adjusting ordinal and cardinal inconsistencies through a graphical and optimal approach in AHP models. Computers & Operations Research, 34, 780–798.
- Lin, J., Spiegler, V. L., & Naim, M. M. (2018). Dynamic analysis and design of a semiconductor supply chain: A control engineering approach. International Journal of Production Research, 56(13), 4585–4611.
- Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B., & Towill, D. R. (2000). Engineering the leagile supply chain. International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 2(1), 54–61.
10.1108/14654650010312606 Google Scholar
- Miguéis, V. L., Camanho, A. S., & e Cunha, J. F. (2019). Evaluating the short-term effect of cross-market discounts in purchases using neural networks: A case in retail sector. Expert Systems, 36(6), e12452.
- Mikhailov, L. (2000). A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 341–349.
- Naderpour, H., & Mirrashid, M. (2020a). Proposed soft computing models for moment capacity prediction of reinforced concrete columns. Soft Computing, 24, 11715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04634-8
- Naderpour, H., & Mirrashid, M. (2020b). Bio-inspired predictive models for shear strength of reinforced concrete beams having steel stirrups. Soft Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04698-x
- Naderpour, H., Nagai, K., Haji, M., & Mirrashid, M. (2019). Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference modelling and sensitivity analysis for capacity estimation of fiber reinforced polymer-strengthened circular reinforced concrete columns. Expert Systems, 36(4), e12410.
- Olhager, J. (2003). Strategic positioning of the order penetration point. International Journal of Production Economics, 85(3), 319–329.
- Olhager, J. (2010). The role of the CODP in production and supply chain management. Computers in Industry, 61(9), 863–868.
- Olhager, J., & Wikner, J. (1998). A framework for integrated material and capacity based master scheduling. In A. Drexl & A. Kimms (Eds.), Beyond manufacturing resource planning (MRPII)—Advanced models and methods for production planning (pp. 3–20). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
10.1007/978-3-662-03742-3_1 Google Scholar
- Olhager, J., & Wikner, J. (2000). Production planning and control tools. Production Planning and Control, 11(3), 210–222.
- Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455.
- Pagh, J. D., & Cooper, M. C. (1998). Supply chain postponement and speculation strategies: How to choose the right strategy. Journal of Business Logistics, 19(2), 13–33.
- Pekelman, D., & Sen, S. K. (1974). Mathematical programming models for the determination of attribute weights. Management Science, 20(8), 1217–1229.
- Piraisoodi, T., Siluvairaj, W. I. M., & Kappuva, M. A. K. (2019). Multi-objective robust fuzzy fractional order proportional–integral–derivative controller design for nonlinear hydraulic turbine governing system using evolutionary computation techniques. Expert Systems, 36(2), e12366.
- Rabbani, M., & Yusefnejad, H. (2016). A modern DEANP method for CODP positioning in a supply chain. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 22(4), 393–408.
10.1504/IJISE.2016.075202 Google Scholar
- Rafiei, H., & Rabbani, M. (2011). Order partitioning and order penetration point location in hybrid make-to-stock/make-to-order production contexts. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61(3), 550–560.
- Rafiei, H., & Rabbani, M. (2014). Hybrid MTS/MTO order partitioning framework based upon fuzzy analytic network process. Applied Soft Computing, 19, 312–321.
- J. Romme, & S. Hoekstra (Eds.). (1992). Integral logistic structures: Developing customer-oriented goods flow. New York, NY: Industrial Press.
- Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resources allocation (p. 281). New York, NY: McGraw.
- Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback. The analytic network process. Pitsburg, PA: RWS Publications.
- Saaty, T. L. (2001). Fundamentals of the analytic hierarchy process. In The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision-making (pp. 15–35). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
10.1007/978-94-015-9799-9_2 Google Scholar
- Semini, M., Haartveit, D. E. G., Alfnes, E., Arica, E., Brett, P. O., & Strandhagen, J. O. (2014). Strategies for customized shipbuilding with different customer order decoupling points. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 228(4), 362–372.
- Sharman, G. (1984). Rediscovery of logistics. Harvard Business Review, 5, 71–79.
- Shidpour, H., Da Cunha, C., & Bernard, A. (2014). Analyzing single and multiple CODP positioning based on customer value: A multi-objective approach. Procedia CIRP, 17, 669–674.
10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.102 Google Scholar
- Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., Simchi-Levi, E. (2009). Designing and managing the supply chain: Concepts, strategies, and case studies. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
- Torra, V. (2005). Fuzzy c-means for fuzzy hierarchical clustering. Paper presented at: The 14th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 2005. FUZZ'05. pp. 646–651.
- Torra, V., Narukawa, Y. (2009). On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. Paper presented at: The 14th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 2009. FUZZ-IEEE 2009.pp. 1378–1382.
- Tzeng, G.-H., & Huang, J.-J. (2011). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
10.1201/b11032 Google Scholar
- Van der Vlist, P., Hoppenbrouwers, J. E. M., & Hegge, H. M. H. (1997). Extending the enterprise through multi-level supply control. International Journal of Production Economics, 53(1), 35–42.
- Van Donk, D. P. (2001). Make to stock or make to order: The decoupling point in the food processing industries. International Journal of Production Economics, 69(2), 297–306.
- van Donk, D. P., & van Doorne, R. (2016). The impact of the customer order decoupling point on type and level of supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Research, 54(9), 2572–2584.
- Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Yang, W., & Ji, H. (2015). Selection of low-temperature phase-change materials for thermal energy storage based on the VIKOR method. Energy Technology, 3(1), 84–89.
- Xia, M. M., & Xu, Z. S. (2011). Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision-making. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 52, 395–407.
- Xia, M. M., & Xu, Z. S. (2013). Managing hesitant information in GDM problems under fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 21, 865–897.
- Xu, Z. (2014). Hesitant fuzzy sets theory (Vol. 314). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
10.1007/978-3-319-04711-9 Google Scholar
- Xu, Z. S., & Wei, C. P. (1999). A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 116(2), 443–449.
- Yalcin, N., Bayrakdaroglu, A., & Kahraman, C. (2012). Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 350–364.
- Yazici, I., & Kahraman, C. (2015). VIKOR method using interval type two fuzzy sets. Journal of Intelligent Fuzzy Systems, 29(1), 411–421.
- Yeh, J. M., Kreng, B., & Lin, C. (2001). A consensus approach for synthesizing the elements of comparison matrix in the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Systems Science, 32, 1353–1363.
- Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.
- Zaerpour, N., Rabbani, M., Gharehgozli, A. H., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2008). Make-to-order or make-to-stock decision by a modern hybrid approach. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 22(2), 186–201.
- Zavadskas, E. K., Govindan, K., Antucheviciene, J., & Turskis, Z. (2016). Hybrid multiple criteria decision-making methods: A review of applications for sustainability issues. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 29(1), 857–887.
- Zhang, G., Wang, J.-q., & Wang, T.-l. (2019). Multi-criteria group decision-making method based on TODIM with probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information. Expert Systems, 36(4), e12424.
- Zhang, N., & Wei, G. (2013). Extension of VIKOR method for decision-making problem based on hesitant fuzzy set. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(7), 4938–4947.
- Zhu, B., Xu, Z., Zhang, R., & Hong, M. (2015). Generalized analytic network process. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(1), 277–288.
- Zhu, B., Xu, Z., Zhang, R., & Hong, M. (2016). Hesitant analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(2), 602–614.
- Zhu, G. N., Hu, J., Qi, J., Gu, C. C., & Peng, Y. H. (2015). An integrated AHP and VIKOR for design concept evaluation based on rough number. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 29(3), 408–418.
