Specific consistency score for rational selection of epilepsy resection surgery candidates
Maya Tojima
Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorAkihiro Shimotake
Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorShuichiro Neshige
Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Therapeutics, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorTadashi Okada
Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorKatsuya Kobayashi
Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorKiyohide Usami
Department of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders, and Physiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorMasao Matsuhashi
Department of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders, and Physiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorMasayuki Honda
Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHirofumi Takeyama
Department of Respiratory Care and Sleep Control Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorTakefumi Hitomi
Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorTakeshi Yoshida
Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorAtsushi Yokoyama
Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorYasutaka Fushimi
Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorTsukasa Ueno
Department of Psychiatry, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorYukihiro Yamao
Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorTakayuki Kikuchi
Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorTakao Namiki
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorYoshiki Arakawa
Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorRyosuke Takahashi
Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Akio Ikeda
Department of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders, and Physiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Correspondence
Akio Ikeda, Department of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders, and Physiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54, Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorMaya Tojima
Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorAkihiro Shimotake
Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorShuichiro Neshige
Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Therapeutics, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorTadashi Okada
Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorKatsuya Kobayashi
Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorKiyohide Usami
Department of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders, and Physiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorMasao Matsuhashi
Department of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders, and Physiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorMasayuki Honda
Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHirofumi Takeyama
Department of Respiratory Care and Sleep Control Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorTakefumi Hitomi
Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorTakeshi Yoshida
Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorAtsushi Yokoyama
Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorYasutaka Fushimi
Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorTsukasa Ueno
Department of Psychiatry, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorYukihiro Yamao
Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorTakayuki Kikuchi
Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorTakao Namiki
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorYoshiki Arakawa
Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorRyosuke Takahashi
Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Akio Ikeda
Department of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders, and Physiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Correspondence
Akio Ikeda, Department of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders, and Physiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54, Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Objective
Degree of indication for epilepsy surgery is determined by taking multiple factors into account. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the Specific Consistency Score (SCS), a proposed score for focal epilepsy to rate the indication for epilepsy focal resection.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included patients considered for resective epilepsy surgery in Kyoto University Hospital from 2011 to 2022. Plausible epileptic focus was tentatively defined. Cardinal findings were scored based on specificity and consistency with the estimated laterality and lobe. The total points represented SCS. The association between SCS and the following clinical parameters was assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis: (1) probability of undergoing resective epilepsy surgery, (2) good postoperative seizure outcome (Engel I and II or Engel I only), and (3) lobar concordance between the noninvasively estimated focus and intracranial electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings.
Results
A total of 131 patients were evaluated. Univariate analysis revealed higher SCS in the (1) epilepsy surgery group (8.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 7.8–8.9] vs. 4.9 [95% CI = 4.3–5.5] points; p < .001), (2) good postoperative seizure outcome group (Engel I and II; 8.7 [95% CI = 8.2–9.3] vs. 6.4 [95% CI = 4.5–8.3] points; p = .008), and (3) patients whose focus defined by intracranial EEG matched the noninvasively estimated focus (8.3 [95% CI = 7.3–9.2] vs. 5.4 [95% CI = 3.5–7.3] points; p = .004). Multivariate analysis revealed areas under the curve of .843, .825, and .881 for Parameters 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
Significance
SCS provides a reliable index of good indication for resective epilepsy surgery and can be easily available in many institutions not necessarily specializing in epilepsy.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
K.U., M.M., and A.I. are the currently members of the Department of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders, and Physiology. Since June 2018, this department is the Industry-Academia Collaboration Courses supported by Eisai, Nihon Kohden, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, and UCB Japan. H.T. was previously a member of the Department of Respiratory Care and Sleep Control Medicine. This is the department has received donations from Teijin Pharma, Philips Respironics, Fukuda Denshi, and Fukuda Lifetech Keiji. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
epi17945-sup-0001-AppendixS1.docxWord 2007 document , 208.8 KB |
Appendix S1. |
epi17945-sup-0002-AppendixS2.xlsxapplication/excel, 1.5 MB |
Appendix S2. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1Duchowny M, Harvey S, Sperling M, Williamson A. Indications and criteria for surgical intervention. In: J Engel, TA Pedley, editors. Epilepsy: a comprehensive textbook. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 1751–1759.
- 2Morris H, Najm I, Kahane P. Epilepsy surgery: patient selection. In: HO Lüders, editor. Textbook of epilepsy surgery. Boca Raton: CRC press; 2008. p. 231–237.
- 3Wiebe S, Blume WT, Girvin JP, Eliasziw M. Effectiveness and efficiency of surgery for temporal lobe epilepsy study group. A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345(5): 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200108023450501
- 4Engel J Jr, Wiebe S, French J, Sperling M, Williamson P, Spencer D, et al. Practice parameter: temporal lobe and localized neocortical resections for epilepsy: report of the quality standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of neurology, in association with the American Epilepsy Society and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Neurology. 2003; 60(4): 538–547. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000055086.35806.2d
- 5Schmidt D, Stavem K. Long-term seizure outcome of surgery versus no surgery for drug-resistant partial epilepsy: a review of controlled studies. Epilepsia. 2009; 50(6): 1301–1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01997.x
- 6Schomer DL, Lewis RJ. Stopping seizures early and the surgical epilepsy trial that stopped even earlier. JAMA. 2012; 307(9): 966–968. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.251
- 7Dam M. Epilepsy surgery. Acta Neurol Scand. 1996; 94(2): 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.1996.tb07034.x
- 8Rathore C, Radhakrishnan K. Concept of epilepsy surgery and presurgical evaluation. Epileptic Disord. 2015; 17(1): 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1684/epd.2014.0720
- 9Jobst BC, Cascino GD. Resective epilepsy surgery for drug-resistant focal epilepsy: a review. JAMA. 2015; 313(3): 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.17426
- 10Yasuda CL, Tedeschi H, Oliveira EL, Ribas GC, Costa AL, Cardoso TA, et al. Comparison of short-term outcome between surgical and clinical treatment in temporal lobe epilepsy: a prospective study. Seizure. 2006; 15(1): 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2005.10.005
- 11Tonini C, Beghi E, Berg AT, Bogliun G, Giordano L, Newton RW, et al. Predictors of epilepsy surgery outcome: a meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res. 2004; 62(1): 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2004.08.006
- 12Alim-Marvasti A, Vakharia VN, Duncan JS. Multimodal prognostic features of seizure freedom in epilepsy surgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022; 93(5): 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2021-327119
- 13Téllez-Zenteno JF, Hernández Ronquillo L, Moien-Afshari F, Wiebe S. Surgical outcomes in lesional and non-lesional epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res. 2010; 89(2–3): 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2010.02.007
- 14Fois C, Kovac S, Khalil A, Uzuner GT, Diehl B, Wehner T, et al. Predictors for being offered epilepsy surgery: 5-year experience of a tertiary referral centre. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016; 87(2): 209–211. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2014-310148
- 15Jayakar P, Gotman J, Harvey AS, Palmini A, Tassi L, Schomer D, et al. Diagnostic utility of invasive EEG for epilepsy surgery: indications, modalities, and techniques. Epilepsia. 2016; 57(11): 1735–1747. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13515
- 16Kovac S, Vakharia VN, Scott C, Diehl B. Invasive epilepsy surgery evaluation. Seizure. 2017; 44(1): 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2016.10.016
- 17Garcia Gracia C, Yardi R, Kattan MW, Nair D, Gupta A, Najm I, et al. Seizure freedom score: a new simple method to predict success of epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. 2015; 56(3): 359–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12892
- 18Dugan P, Carlson C, Jetté N, Wiebe S, Bunch M, Kuzniecky R, et al. Derivation and initial validation of a surgical grading scale for the preliminary evaluation of adult patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2017; 58(5): 792–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13730
- 19Conte F, Van Paesschen W, Legros B, Depondt C. The epilepsy surgery grading scale: validation in an independent population with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2019; 60(8): e78–e82. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.16096
- 20Astner-Rohracher A, Zimmermann G, Avigdor T, Abdallah C, Barot N, Brázdil M, et al. Development and validation of the 5-SENSE score to predict Focality of the seizure-onset zone as assessed by Stereoelectroencephalography. JAMA Neurol. 2022; 79(1): 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.4405
- 21Fisher RS, van Emde BW, Blume W, Elger C, Genton P, Lee P, et al. Epileptic seizures and epilepsy: definitions proposed by the international league against epilepsy (ILAE) and the International Bureau for Epilepsy (IBE). Epilepsia. 2005; 46(4): 470–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-9580.2005.66104.x
- 22Fisher RS, Acevedo C, Arzimanoglou A, Bogacz A, Cross JH, Elger CE, et al. ILAE official report: a practical clinical definition of epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2014; 55(4): 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12550
- 23Wechsler D. The Wechsler memory scale–III manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation; 1997.
- 24Wechsler D. Manual for the Wechsler memory scale-revised. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation; 1987.
- 25Tassi L, Meroni A, Deleo F, Villani F, Mai R, Russo GL, et al. Temporal lobe epilepsy: neuropathological and clinical correlations in 243 surgically treated patients. Epileptic Disord. 2009; 11(4): 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1684/epd.2009.0279
- 26Loring DW, Meador KJ, Lee GP, Murro AM, Smith JR, Flanigin HF, et al. Cerebral language lateralization: evidence from intracarotid amobarbital testing. Neuropsychologia. 1990; 28(8): 831–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(90)90007-b
- 27Springer JA, Binder JR, Hammeke TA, Swanson SJ, Frost JA, Bellgowan PSF, et al. Language dominance in neurologically normal and epilepsy subjects: a functional MRI study. Brain. 1999; 122(Pt 11): 2033–2046. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/122.11.2033
- 28Engel J Jr, Van Ness P, Rasmussen TB, Ojemann LM. Outcome with respect to epileptic seizures. In: J Engel, editor. Surgical treatment of the epilepsies. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press; 1993. p. 609–621.
- 29Culler GW 4th, Jobst BC. Surgical treatments for epilepsy. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2022; 28(2): 536–558. https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000001106
- 30Schneider F, Irene Wang Z, Alexopoulos AV, Almubarak S, Kakisaka Y, Jin K, et al. Magnetic source imaging and ictal SPECT in MRI-negative neocortical epilepsies: additional value and comparison with intracranial EEG. Epilepsia. 2013; 54(2): 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12004
- 31El Tahry R, Wang ZI, Thandar A, Podkorytova I, Krishnan B, Tousseyn S, et al. Magnetoencephalography and ictal SPECT in patients with failed epilepsy surgery. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018; 129(8): 1651–1657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2018.05.010
- 32Knowlton RC, Elgavish R, Howell J, Blount J, Burneo JG, Faught E, et al. Magnetic source imaging versus intracranial electroencephalogram in epilepsy surgery: a prospective study. Ann Neurol. 2006; 59(5): 835–842. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20857
- 33Kaiboriboon K, Lowe VJ, Chantarujikapong SI, Hogan RE. The usefulness of subtraction ictal SPECT coregistered to MRI in single- and dual-headed SPECT cameras in partial epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2002; 43(4): 408–414. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.21201.x
- 34Yun CH, Lee SK, Lee SY, Kim KK, Jeong SW, Chung CK. Prognostic factors in neocortical epilepsy surgery: multivariate analysis. Epilepsia. 2006; 47(3): 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00470.x
- 35Jones AL, Cascino GD. Evidence on use of neuroimaging for surgical treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy: a systematic review. JAMA Neurol. 2016; 73(4): 464–470. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.4996
- 36Sivaraju A, Hirsch L, Gaspard N, Farooque P, Gerrard J, Xu Y, et al. Factors predicting outcome after intracranial EEG evaluation in patients with medically refractory epilepsy. Neurology. 2022; 99(1): e1–e10. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000200569
- 37Englot DJ, Wang DD, Rolston JD, Shih TT, Chang EF. Rates and predictors of long-term seizure freedom after frontal lobe epilepsy surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg. 2012; 116(5): 1042–1048. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.1.JNS111620
- 38Duncan JS. Imaging and epilepsy. Brain. 1997; 120(Pt 2): 339–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/120.2.339
- 39Courtney MR, Antonic-Baker A, Sinclair B, Nicolo JP, Neal A, Law M, et al. 18F-FDG-PET hypometabolism as a predictor of favourable outcome in epilepsy surgery: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2022; 12(10):e065440. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065440
- 40Steinbrenner M, Duncan JS, Dickson J, Rathore C, Wächter B, Aygun N, et al. Utility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy: a multicenter study. Epilepsia. 2022; 63(5): 1238–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.17194
- 41Muhlhofer W, Tan YL, Mueller SG, Knowlton R. MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy-what do we know? Epilepsia. 2017; 58(5): 727–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13699