REVIEW
Ultrasound assessment of carotid arteries: Current concepts, methodologies, diagnostic criteria, and technological advancements
Christopher S. G. Murray MD,
Tamanna Nahar MD,
Hayrapet Kalashyan MD,
Harald Becher MD,
Navin C. Nanda MD,
Christopher S. G. Murray MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Harlem Hospital Center/Columbia University, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorTamanna Nahar MD
Section of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Harlem Hospital Center/Columbia University, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorHayrapet Kalashyan MD
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorHarald Becher MD
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Navin C. Nanda MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
Correspondence
Navin C. Nanda, MD, DSc (Hon), FISCU(D), Heart Station/Echocardiography Laboratories, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorChristopher S. G. Murray MD,
Tamanna Nahar MD,
Hayrapet Kalashyan MD,
Harald Becher MD,
Navin C. Nanda MD,
Christopher S. G. Murray MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Harlem Hospital Center/Columbia University, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorTamanna Nahar MD
Section of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Harlem Hospital Center/Columbia University, New York, New York
Search for more papers by this authorHayrapet Kalashyan MD
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorHarald Becher MD
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Navin C. Nanda MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
Correspondence
Navin C. Nanda, MD, DSc (Hon), FISCU(D), Heart Station/Echocardiography Laboratories, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Following cardiac disease and cancer, stroke continues to be the third leading cause of death and disability due to chronic disease in the developed world. Appropriate screening tools are integral to early detection and prevention of major cardiovascular events. In a carotid artery, the presence of increased intima-media thickness, plaque, or stenosis is associated with increased risk of a transient ischemic attack or a stroke. Carotid artery ultrasound remains a long-standing and reliable tool in the current armamentarium of diagnostic modalities used to assess vascular morbidity at an early stage. The procedure has, over the last two decades, undergone considerable upgrades in technology, approach, and utility. This review examines in detail the current state and usage of this integrally important means of extracranial cerebrovascular assessment.
Supporting Information
| Filename | Description |
|---|---|
| echo14197-sup-0001-MovieS1.avivideo/avi, 3.9 MB | Movie S1. Normal carotid examination |
| echo14197-sup-0002-MovieS2.avivideo/avi, 1.9 MB | Movie S2. Severe internal carotid artery stenosis |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- 1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults-United States, 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001; 50: 120–125.
- 2Adams HP Jr, del Zoppo GJ, Alberts MJ, et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups. Stroke. 2007; 38: 1655–1711.
- 3Sacco RL, Boden-Albala B, Gan R, et al. Stroke incidence among white, black, and Hispanic residents of an urban community: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1998; 147: 259–268.
- 4Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2007; 115: e69–e171.
- 5Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2008; 117: e25–e146.
- 6Muntner P, Garrett E, Klag MJ, et al. Trends in stroke prevalence between 1973 and 1991 in the US population 25 to 74 years of age. Stroke. 2002; 33: 1209–1213.
- 7Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 1415–1425.
- 8Wolf PA, Clagett GP, Easton JD, et al. Preventing ischemic stroke in patients with prior stroke and transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association. Stroke. 1999; 30: 1991–1994.
- 9Taylor TN, Davis PH, Torner JC, et al. Lifetime cost of stroke in the United States. Stroke. 1996; 27: 1459–1466.
- 10Wolf PA, Kannel WB, Sorlie P, et al. Asymptomatic carotid bruit and risk of stroke. The Framingham study. JAMA. 1981; 245: 1442–1445.
- 11Chambless LE, Folsom AR, Clegg LX, et al. Carotid wall thickness is predictive of incident clinical stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 151: 478–487.
- 12Heiss G, Sharrett AR, Barnes R, et al. Carotid atherosclerosis measured by B-mode ultrasound in populations: associations with cardiovascular risk factors in the ARIC study. Am J Epidemiol. 1991; 134: 250–256.
- 13Broderick J, Brott T, Kothari R, et al. The Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study: preliminary first-ever and total incidence rates of stroke among blacks. Stroke. 1998; 29: 415–421.
- 14Fine-Edelstein JS, Wolf PA, O'Leary DH, et al. Precursors of extracranial carotid atherosclerosis in the Framingham Study. Neurology. 1994; 44: 1046–1050.
- 15O'Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, et al. Distribution and correlates of sonographically detected carotid artery disease in the Cardiovascular Health Study: the CHS Collaborative Research Group. Stroke. 1992; 23: 1752–1760.
- 16Sacco RL, Roberts JK, Boden-Albala B, et al. Race-ethnicity and determinants of carotid atherosclerosis in a multiethnic population. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke. 1997; 28: 929–935.
- 17Lisabeth LD, Ireland JK, Risser JM, et al. Stroke risk after transient ischemic attack in a population-based setting. Stroke. 2004; 35: 1842–1846.
- 18White H, Boden-Albala B, Wang C, et al. Ischemic stroke subtype incidence among whites, blacks, and Hispanics: the Northern Manhattan Study. Circulation. 2005; 111: 1327–1331.
- 19Libby P, Theroux P. Pathophysiology of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2005; 111: 3481–3488.
- 20Davies KN, Humphrey PR. Complications of cerebral angiography in patients with symptomatic carotid territory ischaemia screened by carotid ultrasound. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993; 56(9): 967–972.
- 21Elgersma OE, Buijs PC, Wüst AF, van der Graaf Y, Eikelboom BC, Mali WP. Maximum internal carotid arterial stenosis: assessment with rotational angiography versus conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 1999; 213(3): 777–783.
- 22Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Castellano R, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading. Radiology. 2005; 236(1): 204–213.
- 23Wardlaw JM, Chappell FM, Stevenson M, et al. Accurate, practical and cost-effective assessment of carotid stenosis in the UK. Health Technol Assess. 2006; 10(30): pp. iii–iv, ix–x, 1–182.
- 24Weber J, Veith P, Jung B, et al. MR angiography at 3 Tesla to assess proximal internal carotid artery stenoses: contrast-enhanced or 3D time-of-flight MR angiography? Clin Neuroradiol. 2015; 25(1): 41–48.
- 25Polak JF, Shemanski L, O'Leary DH, et al. Hypoechoic plaque at US of the carotid artery: an independent risk factor for incident stroke in adults aged 65 years or older. Cardiovascular Health Study. Radiology. 1998; 208(3): 649–654.
- 26Stein JH, Korcarz CE, Hurst RT, et al. Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: a consensus statement from the American Society of Echocardiography Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Task Force. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008; 21(2): 93–111, quiz 189–190.
- 27Wardlaw JM, Chappell FM, Stevenson M, et al. Accurate, practical and cost-effective assessment of carotid stenosis in the UK. Health Technol Assess. 2006; 10(30): iii–iv, ix–x, 1–182.
- 28Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis—Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference. Ultrasound Q. 2003; 19(4): 190–198.
- 29Comerota AJ, Salles-Cunha SX, Daoud Y, et al. Gender differences in blood velocities across carotid stenoses. J Vasc Surg. 2004; 40: 939–944.
- 30Busuttil SJ, Franklin DP, Youkey JR, et al. Carotid duplex overestimation of stenosis due to severe contralateral disease. Am J Surg. 1996; 172: 144–147.
- 31Chi YW, White CJ, Woods TC, et al. Ultrasound velocity criteria for carotid in-stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007; 69: 349–354.
- 32Howard G, Baker WH, Chambless LE, et al. Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study Investigators. An approach for the use of Doppler ultrasound as a screening tool for hemodynamically significant stenosis (despite heterogeneity of Doppler performance): a multicenter experience. Stroke. 1996; 27: 1951–1957.
- 33Kuntz KM, Polak JF, Whittemore AD, et al. Duplex ultrasound criteria for the identification of carotid stenosis should be laboratory specific. Stroke. 1997; 28: 597–602.
- 34Alexandrov AV. Ultrasound and angiography in the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2003; 5: 141–147.
- 35Paciaroni M, Caso V, Cardaioli G, et al. Is ultrasound examination sufficient in the evaluation of patients with internal carotid artery severe stenosis or occlusion? Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003; 15: 173–176.
- 36Filis KA, Arko FR, Johnson BL, et al. Duplex ultrasound criteria for defining the severity of carotid stenosis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2002; 16: 413–421.
- 37Mattos MA, Hodgson KJ, Faught WE, et al. Carotid endarterectomy without angiography: is color-flow duplex scanning sufficient? Surgery. 1994; 116: 776–782.
- 38 North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325(7): 445–453.
- 39 ECST Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet. 1998; 351(9113): 1379–1387.
- 40Williams MA, Nicolaides AN. Predicting the normal dimensions of the internal and external carotid arteries from the diameter of the common carotid. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1987; 1(2): 91–96.
- 41Rothwell PM, Gibson RJ, Slattery J, Sellar RJ, Warlow CP. Equivalence of measurements of carotid stenosis. A comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Stroke. 1994; 25(12): 2435–2439.
- 42Saba L, Mallarini G. A comparison between NASCET and ECST methods in the study of carotids Evaluation using Multi-Detector-Row CT angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2010; 76: 42–47.
- 43Klingelhöfer J. Ultrasonography of carotid stenosis. Int J Clin Neurosci Mental Health. 2014; 1(Suppl 1): S04.
- 44Inaba Y, Chen JA, Bergmann S. Carotid plaque, compared with carotid intima-media thickness, more accurately predicts coronary artery disease events: a met-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2012; 220: 128–133.
- 45Aminbakhish A, Mancini GB. Carotid intima-media thickness measurements: what defines an abnormality? A systematic review Clin Invest Med. 1999; 22(4): 149–157.
- 46Smith SC Jr, Greenland P, Grundy SM. AHA Conference Proceedings. Prevention conference V: beyond secondary prevention: identifying the high-risk patient for primary prevention: executive summary. American Heart Association. Circulation. 2000; 101: 111–116.
- 47Lee W. General principles of carotid doppler ultrasonography. Ultrasonography. 2014; 33: 11–17.
- 48 ASUM Ultrasoundpedia website reference. https://www.ultrasoundpaedia.com/normal-carotids/
- 49Kim S, Lee S, Choi HS, Jung SL, Ahn KJ, Kim BS. Pseudostenosis at the origin of the vertebral artery on contrast-enhanced mra: correlation with aortic motion on dynamic 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA. J Korean Soc Magn Reson Med. 2012; 16: 236–242.
10.13104/jksmrm.2012.16.3.236 Google Scholar
- 50Tahmasebpour HR, Buckley A, Cooperberg PL, Fix CL. Sonographic examination of the carotid arteries. Radiographics. 2005; 25: 1561–1575.
- 51Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis—Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference. Radiology. 2003; 229: 340–346.
- 52Zagzebski JA. Doppler instrumentation. In: J Rowland, L Potts, eds. Essentials of Ultrasound Physics. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1996.
- 53Tahmasebpour HR, Cooperberg PL, Segan-Hoffman J, et al. Velocity quantifications in the carotid ultrasound with Doppler angle set at 44 vs 60 degree (abstr). In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook, IL: Radiological Society of North America, 2003; 297.
- 54Park AE, McCarthy WJ, Pearce WH, Matsumura JS, Yao JS. Carotid plaque morphology correlates with presenting symptomatology. J Vasc Surg. 1998; 27: 872–878.
- 55Gasecki AP, Eliasziw M, Barnett HJ. Risk factors for cervical atherosclerosis in patients with transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1994; 25: 226.
- 56Eliasziw M, Streifler JY, Fox AJ, Hachinski VC, Ferguson GG, Barnett HJ. Significance of plaque ulceration in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Stroke. 1994; 25: 304–308.
- 57O'Leary DH, Holen J, Ricotta JJ, Roe S, Schenk EA. Carotid bifurcation disease: prediction of ulceration with B-mode US. Radiology. 1987; 162: 523–525.
- 58O'Donnell TF Jr, Erdoes L, Mackey WC, et al. Correlation of B-mode ultrasound imaging and arteriography with pathologic findings at carotid endarterectomy. Arch Surg. 1985; 120: 443–449.
- 59Comerota AJ, Katz ML, White JV, Grosh JD. The preoperative diagnosis of the ulcerated carotid atheroma. J Vasc Surg. 1990; 11: 505–510.
- 60Widder B, Paulat K, Hackspacher J, et al. Morphological characterization of carotid artery stenoses by ultrasound duplex scanning. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990; 16: 349–354.
- 61Gray-Weale AC, Graham JC, Burnett JR, Byrne K, Lusby RJ. Carotid artery atheroma: comparison of preoperative B-mode ultrasound appearance with carotid endarterectomy specimen pathology. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1988; 29: 676–681.
- 62Biasi GM, Froio A, Diethrich EB, et al. Carotid plaque echolucency increases the risk of stroke in carotid stenting: the Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) study. Circulation. 2004; 110: 756–762.
- 63Delcker A, Diener HC. Quantification of atherosclerotic plaques in carotid arteries by three-dimensional ultrasound. Br J Radiol. 1994; 67: 672–678.
- 64Griewing B, Schminke U, Morgenstern C, Walker ML, Kessler C. Three-dimensional ultrasound angiography (power mode) for the quantification of carotid artery atherosclerosis. J Neuroimaging. 1997; 7: 40–45.
- 65Landry A, Spence JD, Fenster A. Measurement of carotid plaque volume by 3-dimensional ultrasound. Stroke. 2004; 35: 864–869.
- 66Pollex RL, Spence JD, House AA, et al. A comparison of ultrasound measurements to assess carotid atherosclerosis development in subjects with and without type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2005; 3: 15.
- 67Heliopoulos J, Vadikolias K, Mitsias P, et al. A three-dimensional ultrasonographic quantitative analysis of non-ulcerated carotid plaque morphology in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Atherosclerosis. 2008; 198: 129–135.
- 68Agrawal G, LaMotte LC, Nanda NC. Identification of the aortic arch branches using transesophageal echocardiography. Echocardiography. 1997; 14: 461–466.
- 69Katz ES, Koneckey E, Tunick PA, et al. Visualization and identification of the left common carotid and left subclavian arteries: a transesophageal echocardiographic approach. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1996; 9: 58–61.
- 70Nanda NC, Thakur AC, Thakur D, et al. Transesophageal echocardiographic examination of left subclavian artery branches. Echocardiography. 1999; 16: 271–277.
- 71Nanda NC, Biederman RW, Thakur AC, et al. Examination of left external and internal carotid arteries during transesophageal echocardiography. Echocardiography. 1998; 15: 755–758.
- 72Nanda NC, Gomez CR, Narayan VK, et al. Transpharyngeal echocardiographic diagnosis of carotid bulb and left internal carotid artery stenosis. Echocardiography. 1999; 16: 671–674.
- 73Weyman AE, Feigenbaum H, Dillon JC, et al. Noninvasive visualization of the left main coronary artery by cross sectional echocardiography. Circulation. 1976; 54: 169–174.
- 74Samdarshi TE, Nanda NC, Gatewood RP, et al. Usefulness and limitations of transesophageal echocardiography in the assessment of proximal coronary artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 19: 572–580.
- 75LaMotte LC, Nanda NC, Thakur AC, et al. Transesophageal echocardiographic identification of neck veins: value of contrast echocardiography. Echocardiography. 1998; 15: 259–268.
- 76Voros S, Nanda NC, Thakur AC, et al. Transesophageal echocardiography performed in stroke patients to exclude cardiac sources of embolism accurately detects significant coronary artery stenosis often resulting in changes of management (abstract). Circulation. 1999; lOO: I-677.
- 77Mukhtar OM, Miller AP, Nanda NC, et al. Transesophageal echocardiographic identification of left subclavian artery stenosis with steal phenomenon. Echocardiography. 2000; 17: 197–200.
- 78Nanda NC, Miller AP, Nekkanti R, et al. Transpharyngeal echocardiographic imaging of the right and left carotid arteries. Echocardiography. 2001; 18: 711–716.
- 79Miller AP, Nanda NC, Mukhtar O, et al. Transpharyngeal echocardiographic detection of a left internal carotid artery stent. Echocardiography. 2000; 17: 739–741.
- 80El-Hajj S, Nanda NC, Bhagatwala K, Karia NM, Hage FG. Upper transesophageal and transpharyngeal examination, Chp 25. In: C Nanda, ed. Comprehensive Textbook of Echocardiography. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd; 2014: 487–506. ISBN 978-93-5090-634-7.
- 81Howard JH, Dod HS, Nanda NC, Orr S, Rao GL. Transpharyngeal ultrasound evaluation of internal carotid artery stent in an octogenarian. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 2003; 12: 375–376.
- 82Khanna D, Cheng PH, Nanda NC, et al. Transpharyngeal ultrasound detection of carotid body paraganglioma. Echocardiography. 2004; 21: 299–301.
- 83Kalashyan H, Saqqur M, Shuaib A, Romanchuk H, Nanda NC, Becher H. Comprehensive and rapid assessment of carotid plaques in acute stroke using a new single sweep method for three-dimensional carotid ultrasound. Echocardiography. 2013; 30: 414–418.
Citing Literature
