Volume 59, Issue 3 pp. 243-274
Article

ROSCAS as Insurance: Comparing Formal and Informal Methods of Saving among the Unskilled Workers in the Ethiopian Cut-Flower Industry

Eun Jin Ryu

Corresponding Author

Eun Jin Ryu

KDI School of Public Policy and Management, Sejong, Korea

Corresponding author: Eun Jin Ryu, KDI School of Public Policy and Management, 263 Namsejong-ro, Sejong-si, 30149, Republic of Korea. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Aya Suzuki

Aya Suzuki

Department of International Studies, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 December 2020
Citations: 6

The authors thank Yukichi Mano, Girum Abebe, Kazushi Takahashi, two anonymous referees, and the editor of the journal for their thoughtful comments and insightful suggestions. This paper was financially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP26301018.

Abstract

We explore the factors associated with the savings choice among bank accounts, informal savings groups, and cash savings at home using primary data collected from low-income production workers in cut-flower farms in Ethiopia. A unique contextual feature of our sample is that workers have full access to banks as well as ROSCAs, which allow us to focus on the demand side of saving methods. We find that self-insured workers with greater assets tend to save more in banks. We further find that risk aversion is positively associated with ROSCAs savings but not bank savings, suggesting the workers value the insurance aspect of ROSCAs. We also find that those with greater social connectedness tend to save more with ROSCAs. Overall, we find that informal savings groups work as insurance, complementing formal financial institutions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.