Volume 32, Issue 1 e13145
BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Ciprofloxacin vs levofloxacin for prophylaxis during hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation

Vanessa Copeland

Vanessa Copeland

Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Milena McLaughlin

Corresponding Author

Milena McLaughlin

Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University Chicago College of Pharmacy, Downers Grove, IL, USA

Correspondence

Milena McLaughlin, PharmD, MSc, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University Chicago College of Pharmacy, Downers Grove, IL, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Steven Trifilio

Steven Trifilio

Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 October 2017
Citations: 6

Abstract

The objective of the current retrospective study was to compare differences in rate of breakthrough infections for ciprofloxacin vs levofloxacin prophylaxis in autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) patients treated for multiple myeloma. This was a retrospective, cohort study comparing autologous HSCT recipients treated for multiple myeloma who received ciprofloxacin prophylaxis vs levofloxacin prophylaxis. A total of 297 patients, 143 levofloxacin- and 154 ciprofloxacin-treated were included. There was a significantly higher incidence of bloodstream infections in the ciprofloxacin group (24/154) compared to the levofloxacin group (10/143), P = .03, primarily caused by a statistically higher incidence of gram-positive bloodstream infections (ciprofloxacin [21/154] vs levofloxacin [8/143]; P < .01). Clinically relevant differences exist between fluoroquinolone agents used for prophylaxis. Levofloxacin prophylaxis was more effective than ciprofloxacin prophylaxis to reduce the incidence of bloodstream infections in this study.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.