Volume 41, Issue 2 pp. 165-172
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

An examination of changes in muscle thickness, isometric strength and body water throughout the menstrual cycle

Tayla E. Kuehne

Tayla E. Kuehne

USF Muscle Lab, Exercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ryo Kataoka

Ryo Kataoka

USF Muscle Lab, Exercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Noam Yitzchaki

Noam Yitzchaki

USF Muscle Lab, Exercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Wenyuan G. Zhu

Wenyuan G. Zhu

USF Muscle Lab, Exercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ecaterina Vasenina

Ecaterina Vasenina

USF Muscle Lab, Exercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Samuel L. Buckner

Corresponding Author

Samuel L. Buckner

USF Muscle Lab, Exercise Science Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

Correspondence

Samuel L. Buckner, 4202 E. Fowler Ave. PED 214, Tampa, FL, 33620-8600.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 November 2020
Citations: 5

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine the changes in muscle size and strength throughout the menstrual cycle in females and to compare these values to a control group of time-matched males.

Methods

12 males and 16 females visited the laboratory on four occasions. Measures of muscle thickness (MTH), isometric strength and body water were taken during the menstrual phase, ovulation phase and luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Males scheduled their visits based on a mock menstrual cycle. In addition, participants were asked to complete 4 sets of biceps curls to volitional failure in one arm to examine swelling during each visit.

Results

For MTH there was no interaction (p = .73); however, there was a main effect for sex with males having higher MTH values compared to females [4.07 (0.67) versus. 2.73 (0.42) cm, (p < .001)] at all time points. For changes in MTH (swelling) there was no interaction (p = .28). However, there was a main effect for sex, with males demonstrating greater changes in MTH compared to females [0.53(0.11) versus. 0.40 (0.10) cm, (p < .001)]. Similarly, for total body water, there was no interaction (p = .66). However, males had greater total body water compared to females [49.6 (6.8) versus. 32.3(3.9) kg, p < .001)] at all time points. Finally, for isometric strength, there was no interaction (p = .23). However, there was a main effect for sex. Males had higher isometric strength values compared to females [285 (42) versus. 156(36) N (p < .001)].

Conclusions

Phase of the menstrual cycle does not appear to influence MTH, isometric strength or total body water.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.