The aim of this study was to explore the efficiency of a preconditioning programme composed of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in the protection against muscle damage induced by a subsequent bout of NMES.

Methods

Sixteen male volunteers were split up into a control group (CG; n = 8) and a preconditioned group (PCG; n = 8). Both groups attended two NMES bouts (test 1 and test 2) spaced 5 weeks apart. Each one consisted in 100 quadriceps contractions and 100 hamstrings contractions. PCG attended five additional progressive NMES sessions between test 1 and test 2. The outcome measures were the changes in muscle soreness [0–10 pain score on visual analogue pain scale (VAS)], muscle flexibility and serum creatine kinase (CK) activity; they were assessed before (pre-T1) and after (post-T1) test 1 and before (pre-T2) and after (post-T2) test 2.

Results

Damage markers increased similarly in both groups after test 1 (at post-T1, VAS scores = 4·18 ± 2 and 4·43 ± 1·56 cm in CG and PCG, respectively; CK activity = 2307 ± 3774 and 1671 ± 1790 IU l⁻¹ in CG and PCG, respectively). Compared with test 1, these damage markers were reduced after test 2 in CG (at post-T2, VAS score = 2·68 ± 1·27 cm and CK activity = 218 ± 72 IU l⁻¹). Muscle soreness was further reduced after test 2 in PCG (VAS score = 0·37 ± 0·74 cm).

Conclusions

A protective effect against muscle damage can be obtained after only one NMES bout, and an additional protective effect can be induced by a preconditioning programme.

References

Aldayel A, Jubeau M, McGuigan M, Nosaka K. Less indication of muscle damage in the second than initial electrical muscle stimulation bout consisting of isometric contractions of the knee extensors. Eur J Appl Physiol (2010a); 108: 709–717.
10.1007/s00421-009-1278-0
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Aldayel A, Jubeau M, McGuigan M, Nosaka K. Comparison between alternating and pulsed current electrical muscle stimulation for muscle and systemic acute responses. J Appl Physiol (2010b); 109: 735–744.
10.1152/japplphysiol.00189.2010
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Bergquist AJ, Clair JM, Lagerquist O, Mang CS, Okuma Y, Collins DF. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley. Eur J Appl Physiol (2011); 111: 2409–2426.
10.1007/s00421-011-2087-9
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Black CD, McCully KK. Muscle injury after repeated bouts of voluntary and electrically stimulated exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc (2008); 40: 1605–1615.
10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181788dbe
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Clarkson PM, Nosaka K, Braun B. Muscle function after exercise-induced muscle damage and rapid adaptation. Med Sci Sports Exerc (1992); 24: 512–520.
10.1249/00005768-199205000-00004
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Crameri RM, Aagaard P, Qvortrup K, Langberg H, Olesen J, Kjaer M. Myofibre damage in human skeletal muscle: effects of electrical stimulation versus voluntary contraction. J Physiol (2007); 583: 365–380.
10.1113/jphysiol.2007.128827
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Croisier JL, Camus G, Crielaard JM. Interest of a specific training to reduce DOMS. Isokinet Exerc Sci (2000); 8: 40.
Google Scholar
Croisier JL, Camus G, Forthomme B, Maquet D, Vanderthommen M, Crielaard JM. Delayed onset muscle soreness induced by eccentric isokinetic exercise. Isokinet Exerc Sci (2003); 11: 21–29.
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Hody S, Leprince P, Sergeant K, Renaut J, Croisier JL, Wang FC, Rogister B. Human muscle proteome modifications following acute or repeated eccentric exercises. Med Sci Sports Exerc (2011); 43: 2281–2296.
10.1249/MSS.0b013e318222edf3
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Hortobagyi T, Maffiuletti NA. Neural adaptations to electrical stimulation strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol (2011); 111: 2439–2449.
10.1007/s00421-011-2012-2
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Jubeau M, Sartorio A, Marinone PG, Agosti F, Van Hoecke J, Nosaka K, Maffiuletti NA. Comparison between voluntary and stimulated contractions of the quadriceps femoris for growth hormone response and muscle damage. J Appl Physiol (2008); 104: 75–81.
10.1152/japplphysiol.00335.2007
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Jubeau M, Muthalib M, Millet GY, Maffiuletti NA, Nosaka K. Comparison in muscle damage between maximal voluntary and electrically evoked isometric contractions of the elbow flexors. Eur J Appl Physiol (2012); 112: 429–438.
10.1007/s00421-011-1991-3
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Lavender AP, Nosaka K. A light load eccentric exercise confers protection against a subsequent bout of more demanding eccentric exercise. J Sci Med Sport (2008); 11: 291–298.
10.1016/j.jsams.2007.03.005
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Mackey AL, Bojsen-Moller J, Qvortrup K, Langberg H, Suetta C, Kalliokoski KK, Kjaer M, Magnusson SP. Evidence of skeletal muscle damage following electrically stimulated isometric muscle contractions in humans. J Appl Physiol (2008); 105: 1620–1627.
10.1152/japplphysiol.90952.2008
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Maffiuletti NA. Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Eur J Appl Physiol (2010); 110: 223–234.
10.1007/s00421-010-1502-y
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Maffiuletti NA, Minetto MA, Farina D, Bottinelli R. Electrical stimulation for neuromuscular testing and training: state-of-the art and unresolved issues. Eur J Appl Physiol (2011); 111: 2391–2397.
10.1007/s00421-011-2133-7
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
McHugh MP. Recent advances in the understanding of the repeated bout effect: the protective effect against muscle damage from a single bout of eccentric exercise. Scand J Med Sci Sports (2003); 13: 88–97.
10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.02477.x
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Miles MP, Naukam RJ, Hackney AC, Clarkson PM. Blood leukocyte and glutamine fluctuations after eccentric exercise. Int J Sports Med (1999); 20: 322–327.
10.1055/s-2007-971138
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Nosaka K, Clarkson PM. Variability in serum creatine kinase response after eccentric exercise of the elbow flexors. Int J Sports Med (1996); 17: 120–127.
10.1055/s-2007-972819
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Nosaka K, Newton M, Sacco P. Delayed-onset muscle soreness does not reflect the magnitude of eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage. Scand J Med Sci Sports (2002); 12: 337–346.
10.1034/j.1600-0838.2002.10178.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Nosaka K, Aldayel A, Jubeau M, Chen CC. Muscle damage induced by electrical stimulation. Eur J Appl Physiol (2011); 111: 2427–2437.
10.1007/s00421-011-2086-x
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Paillard T, Noe F, Passelergue P, Dupui P. Electrical stimulation superimposed onto voluntary muscular contraction. Sports Med (2005); 35: 951–966.
10.2165/00007256-200535110-00003
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Proske U, Allen T. Damage to skeletal muscle from eccentric exercise. Exerc Sport Sci Rev (2005); 33: 98–104.
10.1097/00003677-200504000-00007
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Sillen MJ, Speksnijder CM, Eterman RM, Janssen PP, Wagers SS, Wouters EF, Uszko-Lencer NH, Spruit MA. Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation of muscles of ambulation in patients with chronic heart failure or COPD: a systematic review of the English-Language literature. Chest (2009); 136: 44–61.
10.1378/chest.08-2481
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Snyder-Mackler L, Ladin Z, Schepsis AA, Young JC. Electrical stimulation of thigh muscles after reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am (1991); 73: 1025–1036.
10.2106/00004623-199173070-00010
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Szasz G, Gruber W, Bernt E. Creatine in serum: 1. Determination of optimum reaction conditions. Clin Chem (1976); 22: 650–656.
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Vanderthommen M, Duchateau J. Electrical stimulation as a modality to improve performance of the neuromuscular system. Exerc Sport Sci Rev (2007); 35: 180–185.
10.1097/jes.0b013e318156e785
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Vanderthommen M, Triffaux M, Demoulin C, Crielaard JM, Croisier JL. Alteration of muscle function after electrical stimulation bout of knee extensors and flexors. J Sports Sci Med (2012); 11: 592–599.
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Witvrouw E, Danneels L, Asselman P, D'Have T, Cambier D. Muscle flexibility as a risk factor for developing muscle injuries in male professional soccer players. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med (2003); 31: 41–46.
10.1177/03635465030310011801
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume35, Issue4

July 2015

Pages 267-274

Protection against muscle damage induced by electrical stimulation: efficiency of a preconditioning programme

Summary

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

References

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Protection against muscle damage induced by electrical stimulation: efficiency of a preconditioning programme

Summary

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

References

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information