Volume 23, Issue 11 pp. 2948-2954
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Elective minimally invasive surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis: operative outcomes of patients with complicated versus uncomplicated disease

Ido Mizrahi

Ido Mizrahi

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mahmoud Abu-Gazala

Mahmoud Abu-Gazala

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Laura M. Fernandez

Laura M. Fernandez

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Dimitri Krizzuk

Dimitri Krizzuk

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Argyrios Ioannidis

Argyrios Ioannidis

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Steven D. Wexner

Corresponding Author

Steven D. Wexner

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA

Correspondence

Steven D. Wexner, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Department of Colorectal Surgery, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd., Weston, FL 33331, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 July 2021
Citations: 2

Presentation: Poster presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, 19–23 May 2018, Nashville, TN.

Funding information

None.

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this work was to compare the results of elective minimally invasive surgery between patients with complicated sigmoid diverticulitis and those with uncomplicated disease.

Method

An institutional review board-approved database was searched for all consecutive patients who underwent elective minimally invasive surgery, including laparoscopic, hand-assisted and robotic sigmoidectomy, for diverticulitis between 2010 and 2017; they were classified according to the modified Hinchey classification as having complicated (abscess, fistula, stricture, obstruction, bleeding or previous perforation) versus uncomplicated disease. Data recorded included baseline demographics, indications for surgery, operative details and complications.

Results

Three hundred and twenty-five patients underwent elective sigmoidectomy for complicated (n = 105) and uncomplicated (n = 220) diverticulitis. Surgical indications for complicated disease were abscess (n = 74), stricture (n = 14), fistula (n = 28) and bleeding (n = 7). The two groups were statistically comparable for age, gender, body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Patients with complicated disease had higher rates of concomitant loop ileostomy creation (9.5% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.001) and synchronous resections (9.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.01), higher volumes of blood loss (177 ± 140 vs. 125 ± 92 ml, p < 0.001), longer length of stay (5.6 ± 3 vs. 4.8 ± 2 days, p = 0.04) and longer operating time (218.2 ± 59 vs. 185.8 ± 63 min, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in anastomotic leakage (3% vs. 1%, p = 0.3), conversion to laparotomy (4.8% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.3) or overall complications (36% vs. 25.9%, p = 0.06) for complicated versus uncomplicated disease, respectively.

Conclusion

Minimally invasive surgery for complicated diverticulitis resulted in higher rates of construction of proximal ileostomy and synchronous resections and longer operating times and length of hospital stay. Otherwise, it has outcomes that are not significantly different from the results recorded in patients with uncomplicated disease.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.