Volume 15, Issue 6 pp. 747-754
Original Article

Options and outcome for reconstruction after extended left hemicolectomy

F. Dumont

Corresponding Author

F. Dumont

Department of Digestive Oncological Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

Correspondence to: Frédéric Dumont, MD, Department of Oncological Surgery, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
C. Da Re

C. Da Re

Department of Digestive Oncological Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

Search for more papers by this author
D. Goéré

D. Goéré

Department of Digestive Oncological Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

Search for more papers by this author
C. Honoré

C. Honoré

Department of Digestive Oncological Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

Search for more papers by this author
D. Elias

D. Elias

Department of Digestive Oncological Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 February 2013
Citations: 20

Abstract

Aim

A tension-free anastomosis is required to minimize anastomotic leakage after an extended left colectomy when the residual transverse colon is too short to spontaneously reach the pelvis. To resolve this problem, colonic rotation with a right colonic transposition (RCT) or even with a complete intestinal derotation (CID) is mandatory. This study compared these two techniques.

Method

Between January 2001 and December 2011, 39 patients had undergone right colonic transposition (= 29) or complete intestinal derotation (= 10) after an extended left colectomy. All anastomotic complications had been recorded during the follow up.

Results

No differences were found between right colonic transposition and complete intestinal derotation in terms of patient characteristics, surgical indications, therapeutic features and risk factors for anastomotic leakage (sex, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, diabetes, bevacizumab use, colorectal anastomotic level or protective stoma use). Ligature of the middle colic artery was significantly more frequent with right colonic transposition than with complete intestinal derotation (82.7% vs 50%; P = 0.04). An additional colonic resection tended to be required more often in the right colonic transposition group than in the complete intestinal derotation group (55.1% vs 20%; P = 0.054). The anastomotic complication rate was 10.2% and was not significantly different between right colonic transposition and complete intestinal derotation (6.9% vs 20%, P = 0.24).

Conclusion

Both colonic rotation techniques are feasible and safe. The right colonic transposition and complete intestinal derotation techniques yielded similar results in terms of colorectal anastomotic complications, but right colonic transposition required ligature of the middle colic artery and additional colonic resection tended to be required more frequently.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.