Volume 76, Issue 2 pp. 67-73
Original Article

Can contact allergy to p-phenylenediamine explain the high rates of terpene hydroperoxide allergy? – An epidemiological study based on consecutive patch test results

Niels Højsager Bennike

Corresponding Author

Niels Højsager Bennike

Department of Dermato-Allergology, National Allergy Research Centre, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark

Correspondence: Niels Højsager Bennike, Department of Dermato-Allergology, National Allergy Research Centre, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Section 20A, Kildegaardsvej 28, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark. Tel: +45 3867 4157. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin

Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin

Dermatochemistry Laboratory, Institut de Chimie de Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, 67081 Strasbourg cedex, France

Search for more papers by this author
Jeanne D. Johansen

Jeanne D. Johansen

Department of Dermato-Allergology, National Allergy Research Centre, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 June 2016
Citations: 5
Conflicts of interest: The authors have no funding or competing interests to declare.

Summary

Background

Contact allergy to linalool hydroperoxides (Lin-OOHs) and limonene hydroperoxides (Lim-OOHs) is common. Similarly to what occurs with the terpene hydroperoxides, reactive intermediates formed from p-phenylenediamine (PPD) can cause oxidative modifications of tryptophan residues on proteins in mechanistic studies.

Objectives

To test the hypothesis that patients sensitized to PPD are at increased risk of concomitant reactivity to either of the terpene hydroperoxides, owing to a ‘common pathway’ of skin protein oxidation.

Methods

A database study of consecutively patch tested eczema patients (n = 3843) from 2012 to 2015, tested concomitantly with PPD, Lim-OOHs and Lin-OOHs, was performed. Associations were examined by level of concordance and odds ratios (ORs) adjusted for age, sex, and contact allergy to fragrance mix I and fragrance mix II.

Results

Concomitant reactions to PPD were seen in 2.2% of Lim-OOH-positive patients and in 4.9% of Lin-OOH-positive patients. Neither proportion was higher than expected by chance. No association existed between PPD and Lim-OOH patch test reactivity. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, PPD allergy was associated with an insignificantly increased risk (OR 2.11, 95%CI:0.92–4.80) of a positive patch test reaction to Lin-OOHs.

Conclusions

PPD sensitization cannot explain the high rates of sensitization to Lin-OOHs and/or Lim-OOHs. Contact allergy to oxidized linalool is more strongly associated with fragrance allergy than with PPD allergy.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.