Volume 21, Issue 1 pp. 32-41
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Implant health and factors affecting peri-implant marginal bone alteration for implants placed in staged maxillary sinus augmentation: A 5-year prospective study

Stefan Krennmair

Stefan Krennmair

CM

Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Stefan Hunger MD, DMD

Stefan Hunger MD, DMD

Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas Forstner MSc

Thomas Forstner MSc

Department of Applied Systems Research Statistics, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Malek MD, DMD

Michael Malek MD, DMD

Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Gerald Krennmair MD, DMD, PhD

Corresponding Author

Gerald Krennmair MD, DMD, PhD

Dental School, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Correspondence

Gerald Krennmair, Dental School, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, Vienna, Austria 4600.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Stimmelmayr DMD, PhD

Michael Stimmelmayr DMD, PhD

Prosthodontics, Dental School, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 January 2019
Citations: 23

Abstract

Purpose

Evaluating the extent of and the factors affecting marginal bone level (MBL) alterations and consecutively implant success and implant health for implants placed in staged maxillary sinus floor (SF) augmentation.

Materials and Methods

A 5-year prospective, cohort study was conducted on 85 patients with 124 maxillary sinus augmentation procedure and 295 implants placed. Peri-implant MBL alterations (reductions) were evaluated radiographically at the first year, third year, and fifth year postloading follow-ups and were considered to patient-related risk factors (age, gender, diabetes mellitus, smoking, rheumatic disorders, and history of periodontal disease [PD]), to clinican/surgically related risk factors (membrane perforations, sinus site, and residual ridge height), to implant/prosthesis-related features (implant length, diameter, location, keratinized gingiva, and restoration gap), and to the plaque score. Additionally, implant and prostheses survival/success rate and peri-implant health (mucositis/peri-implantitis) were assessed.

Results

About 267/295 implants (drop-out:n9 pat; 28 implants: 9%) were followed for 5 years (survival/success: 99.3%/96.5%), presenting significant (P < .001) differences of MBL alterations (−1.45 ± 0.38 mm) over time. The univariate analysis demonstrated differences of MBL alterations for smokers versus nonsmokers (P = .005), for patients with versus without history of PD (P = .001), and presence versus absence of plaque (P = .041). In the 5-year multivariate analysis, MBL alteration was influenced by time (P = .001) and was related to risk factors as smoking (P = .001; odds ratio [OR] = 6.563) and history of PD (P = .015; OR = 4.450). Significant ORs for MBL alterations were also found for a restoration gap used for a full-arch dentures (P = .001; OR = 8.275) associated with reduced (≤3 mm) residual ridge height (P = .015; OR = 1.365). The overall 5 year incidence of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis was 25.3% and 3.7% at implant level and 30.3% and 6.6% at patient level, respectively.

Conclusions

Apart from the high success rate and healthy status of implant placed in staged SF seen, MBL alteration increased over time and was negatively affected predominately by patient-specific risk factors such as smoking status and previous history of periodontitis.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.