Volume 165, Issue 1 pp. 49-56
Research Paper

Bone marrow hypocellularity does not affect tolerance or efficacy of azacitidine in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

John F. Seymour

Corresponding Author

John F. Seymour

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia

Correspondence: John Seymour, MD, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Haematology, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett St., Melbourne, Vic. 8006, Australia.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
John M. Bennett

John M. Bennett

Medical Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Alan F. List

Alan F. List

Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ghulam J. Mufti

Ghulam J. Mufti

King's College Hospital, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Steven D. Gore

Steven D. Gore

The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Pierre Fenaux

Pierre Fenaux

Hospital Avicenne APHP University Paris XIII, Bobigny, France

Search for more papers by this author
Valeria Santini

Valeria Santini

University of Florence, Florence, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Joel Hetzer

Joel Hetzer

Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen Songer

Stephen Songer

Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Barry S. Skikne

Barry S. Skikne

Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Charles L. Beach

Charles L. Beach

Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 January 2014
Citations: 8

Summary

The efficacy and tolerance of azacitidine in higher-risk myelodysplasia with hypocellular bone marrow (BM) are unknown. This post hoc AZA-001 trial analysis assessed whether baseline BM cellularity affected the overall survival (OS) advantage demonstrated with azacitidine versus conventional care regimens (CCR). Baseline BM biopsies of <30% cellularity were considered hypocellular with data evaluable from 299 patients (azacitidine n = 154, CCR n = 145); 13% (n = 39) hypocellular, 87% (n = 260) non-hypocellular. Patient characteristics were balanced between cellularity and treatment groups. Most patients (90–100%) had 2–3 cytopenias at baseline. Median (range) azacitidine treatment cycle lengths were 35·5 (28–54) and 33·0 (15–75) d in hypocellular and non-hypocellular groups, respectively. At 33 months, median OS was not reached (NR) [95% confidence interval (CI): 19·2, NR] in hypocellular patients receiving azacitidine versus 16·9 months (95% CI: 11·1, 19·3) with CCR (P = 0·001); and in non-hypocellular patients, it was 21·1 months (95% CI: 16·2, 34·7) versus 15·3 months (95% CI: 9·3, 17·6) (P = 0·012). Azacitidine tolerance was similar regardless of cellularity. Grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred similarly in hypocellular patients treated with azacitidine versus CCR (80% vs. 92% and 88% vs. 75%). Azacitidine OS results are consistent with those from AZA-001, regardless of cellularity, and demonstrate its safety and efficacy in higher-risk myelodysplasia with hypocellular BM.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.