Reflectance confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of solitary pink skin tumours: review of diagnostic clues
Corresponding Author
C. Longo
Dermatology and Skin Cancer Unit, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, IRCCS, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy
Correspondence
Caterina Longo.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorE. Moscarella
Dermatology and Skin Cancer Unit, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, IRCCS, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorG. Argenziano
Dermatology and Skin Cancer Unit, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, IRCCS, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorA. Lallas
Dermatology and Skin Cancer Unit, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, IRCCS, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorM. Raucci
Dermatology and Skin Cancer Unit, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, IRCCS, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorG. Pellacani
Dermatology Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorA. Scope
Department of Dermatology, Sheba Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
C. Longo
Dermatology and Skin Cancer Unit, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, IRCCS, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy
Correspondence
Caterina Longo.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorE. Moscarella
Dermatology and Skin Cancer Unit, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, IRCCS, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorG. Argenziano
Dermatology and Skin Cancer Unit, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, IRCCS, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorA. Lallas
Dermatology and Skin Cancer Unit, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, IRCCS, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorM. Raucci
Dermatology and Skin Cancer Unit, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, IRCCS, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorG. Pellacani
Dermatology Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorA. Scope
Department of Dermatology, Sheba Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Search for more papers by this authorFunding sources:
This study was supported in part by the Italian Ministry of Health (RF-2010-2316524).
Conflicts of interest:
None declared.
Summary
Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a noninvasive tool that can be helpful in the diagnosis of nonpigmented skin tumours. As RCM enables visualization of architectural and cytological structures at near-histological resolution, it can improve the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopically equivocal solitary pink neoplasms. For management decisions, it is important to identify specific morphological clues that allow bedside classification of nonpigmented skin neoplasms into benign vs. malignant and melanocytic vs. nonmelanocytic. More specifically, the presence of a nested melanocytic proliferation at the dermoepidermal junction or dermis level permits the clinician to ascribe a given lesion as melanocytic; the identification of basaloid bright tumour islands is a key RCM feature for the diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma; and the presence of disarrayed epidermis along with small demarcated papillae is suggestive for the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma. The present review offers a comprehensive description of the main RCM diagnostic clues for solitary pink neoplasms that direct clinicians to the correct diagnosis and that may serve as groundwork for future prospective studies.
References
- 1Zalaudek I, Kreusch J, Giacomel J et al. How to diagnose nonpigmented skin tumors: a review of vascular structures seen with dermoscopy: part II. Nonmelanocytic skin tumors. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63: 377–86.
- 2Zalaudek I, Kreusch J, Giacomel J et al. How to diagnose nonpigmented skin tumors: a review of vascular structures seen with dermoscopy: part I. Melanocytic skin tumors. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63: 361–74.
- 3Thomas NE, Kricker A, Waxweiler WT et al. Comparison of clinicopathologic features and survival of histopathologically amelanotic and pigmented melanomas: a population-based study. JAMA Dermatol 2014; 150: 1306–14.
- 4Menzies SW, Moloney FJ, Byth K et al. Dermoscopic evaluation of nodular melanoma. JAMA Dermatol 2013; 149: 699–709.
- 5Menzies SW, Kreusch J, Byth K et al. Dermoscopic evaluation of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma. Arch Dermatol 2008; 144: 1120–7.
- 6Goldgeier M, Fox CA, Zavislan JM et al. Noninvasive imaging, treatment, and microscopic confirmation of clearance of basal cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg 2003; 29: 205–10.
- 7Longo C, Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Pellacani G. New directions in dermatopathology: in vivo confocal microscopy in clinical practice. Dermatol Clin 2012; 30: 799–814.
- 8Pellacani G, Pepe P, Casari A, Longo C. Reflectance confocal microscopy as a second-level examination in skin oncology improves diagnostic accuracy and saves unnecessary excisions: a longitudinal prospective study. Br J Dermatol 2014; 171: 1044–51.
- 9Guitera P, Menzies SW, Longo C et al. In vivo confocal microscopy for diagnosis of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma using a two-step method: analysis of 710 consecutive clinically equivocal cases. J Invest Dermatol 2012; 132: 2386–94.
- 10Pellacani G, Vinceti M, Bassoli S et al. Reflectance confocal microscopy and features of melanocytic lesions: an internet-based study of the reproducibility of terminology. Arch Dermatol 2009; 145: 1137–43.
- 11Guitera P, Pellacani G, Crotty KA et al. The impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy on the diagnostic accuracy of lentigo maligna and equivocal pigmented and nonpigmented macules of the face. J Invest Dermatol 2010; 130: 2080–91.
- 12Pellacani G, Longo C, Malvehy J et al. In vivo confocal microscopic and histopathologic correlations of dermoscopic features in 202 melanocytic lesions. Arch Dermatol 2008; 144: 1597–608.
- 13Guitera P, Pellacani G, Longo C et al. In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy enhances secondary evaluation of melanocytic lesions. J Invest Dermatol 2009; 129: 131–8.
- 14Pellacani G, Guitera P, Longo C et al. The impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnostic accuracy of melanoma and equivocal melanocytic lesions. J Invest Dermatol 2007; 127: 2759–65.
- 15Longo C, Farnetani F, Ciardo S et al. Is confocal microscopy a valuable tool in diagnosing nodular lesions? A study of 140 cases. Br J Dermatol 2013; 169: 58–67.
- 16Longo C, Farnetani F, Moscarella E et al. Can noninvasive imaging tools potentially predict the risk of ulceration in invasive melanomas showing blue and black colors? Melanoma Res 2013; 23: 125–31.
- 17Pupelli G, Longo C, Veneziano L et al. Small-diameter melanocytic lesions: morphological analysis by means of in vivo confocal microscopy. Br J Dermatol 2013; 168: 1027–33.
- 18Rajadhyaksha M, González S, Zavislan JM et al. In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin II: advances in instrumentation and comparison with histology. J Invest Dermatol 1999; 113: 293–303.
- 19Gareau DS, Patel YG, Rajadhyaksha M. Basic principles of reflectance confocal microscopy. In: Reflectance Confocal Microscopy of Cutaneous Tumors ( S Gonzalez, M Gill, AC Halpern, eds). London: Informa Healthcare, 2008, 1–6.
10.3109/9780203091562-2 Google Scholar
- 20Wasmeier C, Hume AN, Bolasco G, Seabra MC. Melanosomes at a glance. J Cell Sci 2008; 121: 3995–9.
- 21Ahlgrimm-Siess V, Massone C, Koller S et al. In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of common naevi with globular, homogeneous and reticular pattern in dermoscopy. Br J Dermatol 2008; 158: 1000–7.
- 22Pellacani G, Longo C, Ferrara G et al. Spitz nevi: in vivo confocal microscopic features, dermatoscopic aspects, histopathologic correlates, and diagnostic significance. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 60: 236–47.
- 23Losi A, Longo C, Cesinaro AM et al. Hyporeflective pagetoid cells: a new clue for amelanotic melanoma diagnosis by reflectance confocal microscopy. Br J Dermatol 2014; 171: 48–54.
- 24Hashemi P, Pulitzer MP, Scope A et al. Langerhans cells and melanocytes share similar morphologic features under in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy: a challenge for melanoma diagnosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 66: 452–62.
- 25Braga JC, Scope A, Klaz I et al. The significance of reflectance confocal microscopy in the assessment of solitary pink skin lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 61: 230–41.
- 26Maier T, Sattler EC, Braun-Falco M et al. Reflectance confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of partially and completely amelanotic melanoma: report on seven cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013; 27: e42–52.
- 27Fraga-Braghiroli NA, Stephens A, Grossman D et al. Use of handheld reflectance confocal microscopy for in vivo diagnosis of solitary facial papules: a case series. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014; 28: 933–42.
- 28Pellacani G, De Pace B, Reggiani C et al. Distinct melanoma types based on reflectance confocal microscopy. Exp Dermatol 2014; 23: 414–18.
- 29Curchin C, Wurm E, Jagirdar K et al. Dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy and histopathology of an amelanotic melanoma from an individual heterozygous for MC1R and tyrosinase variant alleles. Australas J Dermatol 2012; 53: 291–4.
- 30Busam KJ, Hester K, Charles C et al. Detection of clinically amelanotic malignant melanoma and assessment of its margins by in vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137: 923–9.
- 31Hantschke M, Bastian BC, LeBoit PE. Consumption of the epidermis: a diagnostic criterion for the differential diagnosis of melanoma and Spitz nevus. Am J Surg Pathol 2004; 28: 1621–5.
- 32Segura S, Pellacani G, Puig S et al. In vivo microscopic features of nodular melanomas: dermoscopy, confocal microscopy, and histopathologic correlates. Arch Dermatol 2008; 144: 1311–20.
- 33Pellacani G, Cesinaro AM, Seidenari S. In vivo assessment of melanocytic nests in nevi and melanomas by reflectance confocal microscopy. Mod Pathol 2005; 18: 469–74.
- 34Ulrich M, Maltusch A, Rius-Diaz F et al. Clinical applicability of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of actinic keratoses. Dermatol Surg 2008; 34: 610–19.
- 35Ulrich M, Maltusch A, Röwert-Huber J et al. Actinic keratoses: non-invasive diagnosis for field cancerisation. Br J Dermatol 2007; 156(Suppl. 3): 13–17.
- 36Longo C, Lallas A, Kyrgidis A et al. Classifying distinct basal cell carcinoma subtype by means of dermatoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014; 71: 716–24.e1
- 37Ahlgrimm-Siess V, Cao T, Oliviero M et al. Seborrheic keratosis: reflectance confocal microscopy features and correlation with dermoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2013; 69: 120–6.
- 38Ahlgrimm-Siess V, Cao T, Oliviero M et al. The vasculature of nonmelanocytic skin tumors in reflectance confocal microscopy, II: vascular features of seborrheic keratosis. Arch Dermatol 2010; 146: 694–5.
- 39Moscarella E, Zalaudek I, Agozzino M et al. Reflectance confocal microscopy for the evaluation of solitary red nodules. Dermatology 2012; 224: 295–300.
- 40Propperova I, Langley RG. Reflectance-mode confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of sebaceous hyperplasia in vivo. Arch Dermatol 2007; 143: 134.