Volume 14, Issue 1 pp. 70-76
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Robotic diaphragmatic plication for eventration: A retrospective analysis of efficacy, safety, and feasibility

Belal Bin Asaf

Belal Bin Asaf

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Srinivas Kodaganur Gopinath

Corresponding Author

Srinivas Kodaganur Gopinath

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India

Correspondence

Srinivas Kodaganur Gopinath, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Old Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, 110060 India.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Arvind Kumar

Arvind Kumar

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Harsh Vardhan Puri

Harsh Vardhan Puri

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Mohan V. Pulle

Mohan V. Pulle

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Sukhram Bishnoi

Sukhram Bishnoi

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 July 2020
Citations: 23

Abbreviations: FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity; PFT, pulmonary function test; RALDP, robot-assisted laparoscopic diaphragmatic plication; RATDP, robot-assisted thoracoscopic diaphragmatic plication.

Abstract

Introduction

Eventration of the diaphragm results in impaired respiratory mechanics, which leads to symptoms of dyspnea. Robotic diaphragmatic plication is a recently reported technique that has had good immediate outcomes. The aim of this study was to describe our transthoracic and transabdominal plication techniques and to analyze the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of robotic diaphragmatic plication in an Indian setting.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at a large tertiary care center in a dedicated thoracic surgery unit. To measure the efficacy of plication, we administered a pulmonary function test to each patient at baseline and 6 months postoperatively and then compared the results.

Results

Eighteen patients underwent robotic diaphragmatic plication during the study period. Of these 18 patients, 12 underwent surgery via a transabdominal approach, and 6 underwent surgery via a transthoracic approach. Surgery was completed robotically in 17 patients. The comparison of the preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function test results showed that the mean ± SD increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 19.9 ± 22.0% (P = .002) and the mean increase in FEV1/forced vital capacity was 5.7 ± 2.5 % (P = .225), indicating a significant improvement in FEV1 after surgery.

Conclusion

Robotic diaphragmatic plication can be performed transthoracically or transabdominally with good surgical outcomes. It is safe, effective, and feasible.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.