Volume 87, Issue 11 pp. 940-944
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY

Metastatic bone disease of the pelvis and extremities: rationalizing orthopaedic treatment

Maria N. Kirkinis

Maria N. Kirkinis

School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Tim Spelman

Tim Spelman

The University of Melbourne Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Deborah May

Deborah May

Department of Orthopaedics, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Peter F. M. Choong

Corresponding Author

Peter F. M. Choong

School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

The University of Melbourne Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Department of Orthopaedics, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence

Professor Peter F. M. Choong, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Level 2, Clinical Sciences Building, 29 Regent Street, Fitzroy, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 April 2016
Citations: 11
M. N. Kirkinis BBiomed; T. Spelman BSc, MBBS; D. May BN, GradCertOrtho; P. F. M. Choong MBBS, MD, FRACS, FAOrthA.

Abstract

Background

Choosing the appropriate treatment for patients presenting with impending or pathological fractures is difficult and understanding the prognosis based on certain characteristics can help inform the decision to treat and construct to use in a palliative setting. We retrospectively analysed patients presenting with metastatic bone disease in the extremities and pelvis.

Methods

Patients presenting with metastatic bone disease to the extremities or pelvis who underwent orthopaedic treatment from 1996 to 2012 were identified. Survival rates were calculated using life table analysis. Univariate and multivariate analysis was achieved with Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results

There were a total of 462 patients. An overall 1-, 2- and 5-year survival rate of 45%, 29% and 13% was identified, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, preoperative haemoglobin was found to be an independent predictor of better survival while lung histotype, age, pathological fracture and previous combined therapy were negative predictors of survival. Patients undergoing prosthetic replacement had a significantly longer period of hospitalization in comparison to those undergoing internal fixation.

Conclusion

This study has contributed to our understanding of the survival rate and survival prognostication for patients presenting for orthopaedic treatment of metastatic bone disease.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.