Volume 86, Issue 5 pp. 356-360
GENERAL

Implementation and evaluation of a checklist to improve patient care on surgical ward rounds

Meron Pitcher

Corresponding Author

Meron Pitcher

Sunshine General Surgical Unit, Western Health, Department of Surgery, North West Academic Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence

Ms Meron Pitcher, Sunshine General Surgical Unit, Western Health, Department of Surgery, North West Academic Centre, The University of Melbourne, Gordon Street, Melbourne, Vic. 3011, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Joshua T. W. Lin

Joshua T. W. Lin

Sunshine General Surgical Unit, Western Health, Department of Surgery, North West Academic Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Graeme Thompson

Graeme Thompson

Sunshine General Surgical Unit, Western Health, Department of Surgery, North West Academic Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Ammar Tayaran

Ammar Tayaran

Sunshine General Surgical Unit, Western Health, Department of Surgery, North West Academic Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Steven Chan

Steven Chan

Sunshine General Surgical Unit, Western Health, Department of Surgery, North West Academic Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 May 2015
Citations: 22
This study was presented at the RACS Victorian Annual Scientific and Fellowship Meeting 2012, presented as a poster at the RACS Annual Scientific Congress 2013, and presented as a poster at the International Forum on Quality and Safety in Health Care, London 2013. An update was presented at the RACS Victorian ASM October 2014.
M. Pitcher FRACS; J. T. W. Lin MBBS; G. Thompson FRACS; A. Tayaran MBChB; S. Chan PhD, FRACS.

Abstract

Background

Key aspects of care may be overlooked on a busy surgical ward round. This study assessed the use of a checklist to correct these omissions. Its use as the basis of structured ward round documentation was then measured.

Methods

Using a structured checklist, key aspects of surgical care were observed and recorded during ward rounds. Initially, members of the surgical team were unaware of the checklist. Subsequently, rounds were performed with a designated member of the team acting as ‘prompter’ if aspects of care were not considered per the checklist. A structured ward round progress form was developed and its completion assessed before and after specific education in its use. Changes in the use of checklist and documentation using the structured form were analysed for statistical significance.

Results

Following the use of a checklist and prompting during ward rounds, significant improvement occurred in the consideration of the majority of criteria included in the checklist, all of which reached statistical significance (P < 0.05). Provision of a structured progress form did not initially improve documentation but this was substantially improved with specific education (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The use of a checklist during surgical ward rounds makes significant improvement in the consideration of most key aspects of care and education in the completion of a structured progress form substantially improved documentation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.