Volume 83, Issue 10 pp. 769-773
VASCULAR

Long-term follow-up of last autogenous option arm vein bypass

Domenic R. Robinson

Corresponding Author

Domenic R. Robinson

Department of Surgery, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Correspondence

Dr Domenic R. Robinson, Basil Hetzel Institute, 37 Woodville Road, Woodville South, SA 5011, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Ramon L. Varcoe

Ramon L. Varcoe

Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital and University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Wilson Chee

Wilson Chee

Department of Surgery, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Peter S. Subramaniam

Peter S. Subramaniam

Department of Surgery, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Glen L. Benveniste

Glen L. Benveniste

Department of Surgery, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Robert A. Fitridge

Robert A. Fitridge

Department of Surgery, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 March 2013
Citations: 10
D. R. Robinson MBBS, PDipSurgAnat; R. L. Varcoe MBBS, MS, FRACS; W. Chee MBBS; P. S. Subramaniam MBBS, FRACS; G. L. Benveniste MBBS, FRACS; R. A. Fitridge MBBS, MS, FRACS.

Abstract

Background

The superiority of autogenous conduits in infrainguinal bypass surgery is well established. At our institution, arm vein is utilized as the last autogenous option for infrainguinal bypass surgery. The aim of this study was to review the long-term outcomes of last autogenous option arm vein bypass.

Methods

All infrainguinal arm vein bypasses performed between 1997 and 2005 by The Queen Elizabeth Hospital vascular surgeons were identified. Patency, reintervention, limb salvage and survival were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier survival estimate method.

Results

Thirty-eight arm vein bypasses were performed in 35 patients. Eighty-nine per cent were performed for critical limb ischaemia. Median follow-up was 58 months (range 2–121). Twelve-month primary, assisted primary and secondary patency rates were 52%, 73% and 76%, respectively. Three-year primary, assisted primary and secondary patency rates were 32%, 61% and 63%, respectively. Five-year primary, assisted primary and secondary patency rates were 21%, 47% and 49%, respectively. Patency was superior in single compared with spliced vein grafts (P < 0.05). Limb salvage rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 94%, 87% and 76%, respectively. Patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 92%, 68% and 49%, respectively.

Discussion

Infrainguinal bypass surgery with arm vein can be performed safely with favourable patency and high rates of limb salvage. Secondary interventions to maintain patency are common and we recommend a vigilant surveillance programme to identify the threatened graft.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.